Backup · head to head
Bacula vs Trilio

Trilio
Backup
Backup and recovery for OpenStack, Kubernetes and Red Hat Virtualization
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Bacula the community edition has no vendor support contract; bacula.org directs support and paid deployments toward the separate commercial Bacula Enterprise product instead.; Trilio coverage is deliberately narrow, so a mixed estate with VMware and physical servers needs a second backup product and two sets of restore procedures.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bacula and Trilio actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Backup).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bacula
Nothing recorded that Trilio does not also cover.
Only in Trilio
- OpenStack backup
- Kubernetes backup
- OpenShift Virtualization
- Open format backups
- Incremental forever
- Self-service restore
- Free basic edition
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bacula
- Linux, Windows, and macOS network backup at scalenot Trilio
- VMware, KVM, Hyper-V virtual machine backupnot Trilio
- MySQL, Oracle, PostgreSQL database backupnot Trilio
- Microsoft Exchange Server backupnot Trilio
- Tape backup and enterprise data retentionnot Trilio
Trilio
- A telco running an OpenStack cloud whose incumbent backup vendor supports it only through generic agentsnot Bacula
- An organisation migrating virtual machines from VMware to OpenShift Virtualization and needing protection on the new platform from day onenot Bacula
- A research institution protecting tenant workloads where each tenant should restore its own data without a ticketnot Bacula
- A platform team wanting to evaluate Kubernetes backup properly on ten nodes before committing budgetnot Bacula
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bacula
- The community edition has no vendor support contract; bacula.org directs support and paid deployments toward the separate commercial Bacula Enterprise product instead.
Trilio
- Coverage is deliberately narrow, so a mixed estate with VMware and physical servers needs a second backup product and two sets of restore procedures.
- Trilio is a small vendor next to the backup incumbents, and buyers with ten year retention obligations should assess the risk of the company being acquired or wound down.
- Enterprise pricing is per node or per virtual machine and is not published, which makes it hard to compare against per-terabyte competitors without going through sales.
- The free basic edition stops at ten nodes with community support only, so the step from evaluation to production is a full commercial negotiation rather than a tier upgrade.
- Restore performance depends on the object storage or NFS target you supply, and egress charges from a cloud object store during a large recovery sit outside the vendor quote entirely.
Pricing, plan by plan
Bacula
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Bacula review.
Trilio
Free- Basic EditionFree
- Up to ten nodes
- No time limit
- Community support only
- Enterprise Edition$undefined/year
- Priced per node or per virtual machine annually
- No scale limits
- OpenStack, Kubernetes, OpenShift and Red Hat Virtualization
Which should you pick?
Choose Trilio if
- You need openstack backup.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Web.
- You also want kubernetes backup.
Questions people ask
- Is Bacula or Trilio better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bacula starts at Free and Trilio at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bacula or Trilio?
- Bacula starts at Free and Trilio at Free.
- Does Bacula or Trilio run on more platforms?
- Bacula runs on Web. Trilio runs on Linux, Web.
- Can I use Bacula for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Bacula best used for?
- Bacula is most often used for linux, windows, and macos network backup at scale, vmware, kvm, hyper-v virtual machine backup, mysql, oracle, postgresql database backup, microsoft exchange server backup. Of those, linux, windows, and macos network backup at scale and vmware, kvm, hyper-v virtual machine backup are not what Trilio is typically brought in for.
- What can Bacula do that Trilio cannot?
- Trilio covers OpenStack backup, Kubernetes backup, OpenShift Virtualization, Open format backups.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Bacula: How much does Bacula cost?
Bacula Community Edition is free and open source. Bacula Enterprise is a commercial offering with a free trial available, but specific pricing is not listed on the main website.
SourceTrilio: Is the free edition production usable?
It is functionally complete up to ten nodes with community support only. Use it to evaluate, but understand that production incidents have no vendor behind them at that tier.
Bacula: Is Bacula free?
Bacula Community Edition is fully free and open source. Enterprise Edition is commercial but offers a free trial to evaluate features before purchasing.
SourceTrilio: Does it support OpenShift Virtualization?
Yes, which is the main reason it appears on shortlists for organisations moving virtual machines off VMware.
Trilio: Where are backups stored?
On NFS or S3-compatible object storage you provide, in an open format rather than a proprietary vendor container.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Bacula vs UrBackup
- Bacula vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Bacula vs Backupify
- Bacula vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Bacula vs Spanning Backup
- Bacula vs CloudAlly
- Bacula vs Velero
- Bacula vs Kopia
- Bacula vs Amanda Enterprise
- Bacula vs Clonezilla
- Bacula vs Restic
- Bacula vs Portworx Backup
- Bacula vs Redstor
- Bacula vs rustic
- Bacula vs StorageCraft ShadowProtect
- Bacula vs SysCloud
- Bacula vs Unitrends Backup
- Bacula vs Commvault Complete Data Protection
- Bacula vs HYCU
- Bacula vs BDRShield
- Bacula vs CloudCasa
- Bacula vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Bacula vs HPE StoreOnce
- Bacula vs MSP360 Backup
- Bacula vs N-able Backup
- Bacula vs OwnBackup
- Trilio vs UrBackup
- Trilio vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Trilio vs Backupify
- Trilio vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Trilio vs Spanning Backup
- Trilio vs CloudAlly
- Trilio vs Velero
- Trilio vs Kopia
- Trilio vs Amanda Enterprise
- Trilio vs Clonezilla
- Trilio vs Restic
- Trilio vs Portworx Backup
- Trilio vs Redstor
- Trilio vs rustic
- Trilio vs StorageCraft ShadowProtect
- Trilio vs SysCloud
- Trilio vs Unitrends Backup
- Trilio vs Commvault Complete Data Protection
- Trilio vs HYCU
- Trilio vs BDRShield
- Trilio vs CloudCasa
- Trilio vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Trilio vs HPE StoreOnce
- Trilio vs MSP360 Backup
- Trilio vs N-able Backup
- Trilio vs OwnBackup

