APIs · head to head
Thunder Client vs Zimpler

Thunder Client
APIs
Lightweight REST API client built as VSCode extension
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Zimpler
APIs
Nordic and Brazilian account-to-account payments for regulated high-risk sectors
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Thunder Client has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Thunder Client paid plans are billed annually only: Starter is $3 per user per month and capped at a maximum of 10 seats, Business is $7 per user per month with 500 monthly collection runs per user, and Enterprise is $16 per user per month for unlimited runs; Zimpler pricing is not published and is set by industry and risk profile, so smaller merchants cannot benchmark a quote and often discover they are paying well above a general-purpose provider.
- They diverge on capability: Thunder Client covers REST Client, Zimpler covers Bank payments.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Thunder Client and Zimpler actually diverge.
| Attribute | Thunder Client | Zimpler |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | freemium | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | VSCode extension, Web | Web, REST API |
| Founded | 2021 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Thunder Client
- REST Client
- Environment variables
- Response testing
- VSCode
- GitHub
- Webhook support
- VSCode extension support
- Web support
Only in Zimpler
- Bank payments
- BankID identity
- Payouts
- Recurring payments
- Risk screening
- Brazil coverage
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Thunder Client
- API Developmentnot Zimpler
- API Gatewaynot Zimpler
- API Testingnot Zimpler
- API Documentationnot Zimpler
- Microservicesnot Zimpler
Zimpler
- A Swedish gambling operator needing deposit and verified identity in a single customer flownot Thunder Client
- A Nordic merchant wanting instant bank payouts rather than card refundsnot Thunder Client
- A trading platform where confirming account ownership before funding is a regulatory requirementnot Thunder Client
- A European operator expanding into Brazil and wanting one provider across both marketsnot Thunder Client
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Thunder Client
- Paid plans are billed annually only: Starter is $3 per user per month and capped at a maximum of 10 seats, Business is $7 per user per month with 500 monthly collection runs per user, and Enterprise is $16 per user per month for unlimited runs
Zimpler
- Pricing is not published and is set by industry and risk profile, so smaller merchants cannot benchmark a quote and often discover they are paying well above a general-purpose provider.
- As a payment facilitator carrying merchant risk, it declines or offboards merchants on risk grounds, which makes it a dependency you cannot assume will persist.
- Its strength is concentrated in the Nordics, and coverage in southern and eastern Europe is thinner than pan-European account-to-account specialists.
- Revenue concentration in iGaming ties the provider to a sector under constant regulatory change, so licence changes in one market affect the supplier as well as the merchant.
- Bank transfers have no chargeback protection, so disputes are handled commercially and consumers used to card protections may resist the payment method.
Pricing, plan by plan
Thunder Client
Free- FreeFree
- REST client
- Collection management
- Local testing
- Pro$8/monthly
- Cloud sync
- Team collaboration
- Advanced features
Zimpler
On request- Zimpler payments$undefined/year
- Per-transaction pricing quoted by industry, risk and volume
- Separate pricing for payouts and identity verification
- Merchant underwriting required, with sector restrictions
Which should you pick?
Choose Thunder Client if
- You need rest client.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on VSCode extension, Web.
- You also want environment variables.
Choose Zimpler if
- You need bank payments.
- You work on Web, REST API.
- You also want bankid identity.
Questions people ask
- Is Thunder Client or Zimpler better?
- Neither clearly leads. Thunder Client starts at Free and Zimpler at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Thunder Client or Zimpler?
- Thunder Client has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Thunder Client and On request for Zimpler.
- Does Thunder Client or Zimpler run on more platforms?
- Thunder Client runs on VSCode extension, Web. Zimpler runs on Web, REST API.
- Can I use Thunder Client for free?
- Yes. Thunder Client has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Zimpler starts at On request.
- What is Thunder Client best used for?
- Thunder Client is most often used for api development, api gateway, api testing, api documentation. Of those, api development and api gateway are not what Zimpler is typically brought in for.
- What can Thunder Client do that Zimpler cannot?
- Thunder Client covers REST Client, Environment variables, Response testing, VSCode. Zimpler covers Bank payments, BankID identity, Payouts, Recurring payments.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Thunder Client: How much does Thunder Client cost?
Thunder Client publishes a free plan at no cost, then Starter at $3, Business at $7 and Enterprise at $16, all priced annually.
SourceZimpler: Which markets does Zimpler cover?
Sweden and the Nordics primarily, plus the wider EU and Brazil. It is strongest where national electronic identity schemes exist.
Thunder Client: Is Thunder Client free?
Yes, there is a free plan. It is used through the Thunder Client extension for VS Code, available from the marketplace, with limits applied compared with the paid tiers.
SourceZimpler: Does it handle identity verification?
Yes. In the Nordics it captures BankID identity alongside the payment, which removes a separate verification step.
Zimpler: Is pricing published?
No. It is quoted per merchant based on sector, risk and volume, and merchants must pass underwriting first.
Related pages
More on Thunder Client
Other head to heads
- Thunder Client vs REST Client VSCode
- Thunder Client vs PocketBase
- Thunder Client vs Appwrite
- Thunder Client vs Hasura
- Thunder Client vs Sanity
- Thunder Client vs Bruno
- Thunder Client vs Paw
- Thunder Client vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Thunder Client vs HTTPie
- Thunder Client vs Prisma
- Thunder Client vs RapidAPI
- Thunder Client vs 10x Banking
- Thunder Client vs Brite Payments
- Thunder Client vs Bud Financial
- Thunder Client vs Episode Six
- Thunder Client vs Kong Gateway
- Thunder Client vs Swagger
- Thunder Client vs Volt
- Thunder Client vs TrueLayer
- Thunder Client vs Trustly
- Thunder Client vs Token.io
- Thunder Client vs Neonomics
- Thunder Client vs Tink
- Thunder Client vs Yapily
- Thunder Client vs Dwolla
- Thunder Client vs Sila
- Thunder Client vs Moov
- Thunder Client vs Fintecture
- Thunder Client vs Kong
- Thunder Client vs Liveblocks
- Thunder Client vs Moesif
- Thunder Client vs Ozone API
- Thunder Client vs Parse Server
- Zimpler vs REST Client VSCode
- Zimpler vs PocketBase
- Zimpler vs Appwrite
- Zimpler vs Hasura
- Zimpler vs Sanity
- Zimpler vs Bruno
- Zimpler vs Paw
- Zimpler vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Zimpler vs HTTPie
- Zimpler vs Prisma
- Zimpler vs RapidAPI
- Zimpler vs 10x Banking
- Zimpler vs Brite Payments
- Zimpler vs Bud Financial
- Zimpler vs Episode Six
- Zimpler vs Kong Gateway
- Zimpler vs Swagger
- Zimpler vs Volt
- Zimpler vs TrueLayer
- Zimpler vs Trustly
- Zimpler vs Token.io
- Zimpler vs Neonomics
- Zimpler vs Tink
- Zimpler vs Yapily
- Zimpler vs Dwolla
- Zimpler vs Sila
- Zimpler vs Moov
- Zimpler vs Fintecture
- Zimpler vs Kong
- Zimpler vs Liveblocks
- Zimpler vs Moesif
- Zimpler vs Ozone API
- Zimpler vs Parse Server
