Softwr

APIs · head to head

Neonomics vs Thunder Client

Neonomics logo

Neonomics

APIs

Nordic open banking payments and data, now with UK coverage through Ordo

From
On request
Rated
-
Thunder Client logo

Thunder Client

APIs

Lightweight REST API client built as VSCode extension

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Only Thunder Client has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Neonomics coverage outside the Nordics and the UK is comparatively shallow, so a pan European merchant will find gaps and inconsistent bank behaviour in southern and eastern markets.; Thunder Client paid plans are billed annually only: Starter is $3 per user per month and capped at a maximum of 10 seats, Business is $7 per user per month with 500 monthly collection runs per user, and Enterprise is $16 per user per month for unlimited runs
  • They diverge on capability: Neonomics covers Payment initiation, Thunder Client covers REST Client.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Neonomics and Thunder Client actually diverge.

Attributes where Neonomics and Thunder Client differ
AttributeNeonomicsThunder Client
Starting priceOn requestFree
Pricing modelquotefreemium
Free tierNoYes
PlatformsWeb, APIVSCode extension, Web
FoundedUnknown2021

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Neonomics

  • Payment initiation
  • Account information
  • Nordic bank depth
  • UK coverage via Ordo
  • Variable recurring payments
  • Request to pay
  • White label journeys
  • Reconciliation data

Only in Thunder Client

  • REST Client
  • Environment variables
  • Response testing
  • VSCode
  • GitHub
  • Webhook support
  • VSCode extension support
  • Web support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Neonomics

  • A Norwegian or Swedish merchant collecting payments directly from bank accounts to avoid card feesnot Thunder Client
  • A debt collection agency sending request to pay messages instead of chasing bank transfers manuallynot Thunder Client
  • A software vendor embedding pay by bank into an accounting or invoicing product for Nordic customersnot Thunder Client
  • A business needing both UK and Nordic bank payment coverage from one suppliernot Thunder Client

Thunder Client

  • API Developmentnot Neonomics
  • API Gatewaynot Neonomics
  • API Testingnot Neonomics
  • API Documentationnot Neonomics
  • Microservicesnot Neonomics

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Neonomics

  • Coverage outside the Nordics and the UK is comparatively shallow, so a pan European merchant will find gaps and inconsistent bank behaviour in southern and eastern markets.
  • It is a small company relative to Tink and TrueLayer, so supplier viability and the depth of engineering support behind bank API changes are genuine procurement questions.
  • Payment initiation only means the merchant handles settlement, reconciliation and refunds, and there is no chargeback framework to fall back on.
  • Integrating a recently acquired UK business means two regulatory entities and, for a period, two technology stacks, so cross market feature parity is a promise rather than an existing state.
  • Conversion is governed by each bank's own authentication experience, and Nordic BankID flows behave differently from UK app redirects, so a single UX cannot be assumed across the footprint.

Thunder Client

  • Paid plans are billed annually only: Starter is $3 per user per month and capped at a maximum of 10 seats, Business is $7 per user per month with 500 monthly collection runs per user, and Enterprise is $16 per user per month for unlimited runs

Pricing, plan by plan

Neonomics

On request
  • Neonomics platform$undefined/year
    • Quoted per customer, typically per initiated payment or per API call
    • Volume commitments and monthly minimums are common
    • Payment initiation only; merchant handles settlement and refunds

Thunder Client

Free
  • FreeFree
    • REST client
    • Collection management
    • Local testing
  • Pro$8/monthly
    • Cloud sync
    • Team collaboration
    • Advanced features

Which should you pick?

Choose Neonomics if

  • You need payment initiation.
  • You work on Web, API.
  • You also want account information.

Choose Thunder Client if

  • You need rest client.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on VSCode extension, Web.
  • You also want environment variables.

Questions people ask

Is Neonomics or Thunder Client better?
Neither clearly leads. Neonomics starts at On request and Thunder Client at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Neonomics or Thunder Client?
Thunder Client has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Neonomics and Free for Thunder Client.
Does Neonomics or Thunder Client run on more platforms?
Neonomics runs on Web, API. Thunder Client runs on VSCode extension, Web.
Can I use Thunder Client for free?
Yes. Thunder Client has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Neonomics starts at On request.
What is Neonomics best used for?
Neonomics is most often used for a norwegian or swedish merchant collecting payments directly from bank accounts to avoid card fees, a debt collection agency sending request to pay messages instead of chasing bank transfers manually, a software vendor embedding pay by bank into an accounting or invoicing product for nordic customers, a business needing both uk and nordic bank payment coverage from one supplier. Of those, a norwegian or swedish merchant collecting payments directly from bank accounts to avoid card fees and a debt collection agency sending request to pay messages instead of chasing bank transfers manually are not what Thunder Client is typically brought in for.
What can Neonomics do that Thunder Client cannot?
Neonomics covers Payment initiation, Account information, Nordic bank depth, UK coverage via Ordo. Thunder Client covers REST Client, Environment variables, Response testing, VSCode.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Neonomics: Is Neonomics authorised in the UK?

Yes, through the acquisition of Ordo, an FCA authorised open banking payments firm, approved by the FCA and the Norwegian regulator.

Thunder Client: How much does Thunder Client cost?

Thunder Client publishes a free plan at no cost, then Starter at $3, Business at $7 and Enterprise at $16, all priced annually.

Source
Neonomics: Does it support variable recurring payments?

Yes in the UK through the Ordo capability, subject to which banks support commercial VRP; support elsewhere is more limited.

Thunder Client: Is Thunder Client free?

Yes, there is a free plan. It is used through the Thunder Client extension for VS Code, available from the marketplace, with limits applied compared with the paid tiers.

Source
Neonomics: Does Neonomics hold merchant funds?

No. It initiates payments; settlement, reconciliation and refunds remain with the merchant or its payment provider.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads