APIs · head to head
Neonomics vs Thunder Client

Neonomics
APIs
Nordic open banking payments and data, now with UK coverage through Ordo
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Thunder Client
APIs
Lightweight REST API client built as VSCode extension
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Thunder Client has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Neonomics coverage outside the Nordics and the UK is comparatively shallow, so a pan European merchant will find gaps and inconsistent bank behaviour in southern and eastern markets.; Thunder Client paid plans are billed annually only: Starter is $3 per user per month and capped at a maximum of 10 seats, Business is $7 per user per month with 500 monthly collection runs per user, and Enterprise is $16 per user per month for unlimited runs
- They diverge on capability: Neonomics covers Payment initiation, Thunder Client covers REST Client.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Neonomics and Thunder Client actually diverge.
| Attribute | Neonomics | Thunder Client |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, API | VSCode extension, Web |
| Founded | Unknown | 2021 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Neonomics
- Payment initiation
- Account information
- Nordic bank depth
- UK coverage via Ordo
- Variable recurring payments
- Request to pay
- White label journeys
- Reconciliation data
Only in Thunder Client
- REST Client
- Environment variables
- Response testing
- VSCode
- GitHub
- Webhook support
- VSCode extension support
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Neonomics
- A Norwegian or Swedish merchant collecting payments directly from bank accounts to avoid card feesnot Thunder Client
- A debt collection agency sending request to pay messages instead of chasing bank transfers manuallynot Thunder Client
- A software vendor embedding pay by bank into an accounting or invoicing product for Nordic customersnot Thunder Client
- A business needing both UK and Nordic bank payment coverage from one suppliernot Thunder Client
Thunder Client
- API Developmentnot Neonomics
- API Gatewaynot Neonomics
- API Testingnot Neonomics
- API Documentationnot Neonomics
- Microservicesnot Neonomics
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Neonomics
- Coverage outside the Nordics and the UK is comparatively shallow, so a pan European merchant will find gaps and inconsistent bank behaviour in southern and eastern markets.
- It is a small company relative to Tink and TrueLayer, so supplier viability and the depth of engineering support behind bank API changes are genuine procurement questions.
- Payment initiation only means the merchant handles settlement, reconciliation and refunds, and there is no chargeback framework to fall back on.
- Integrating a recently acquired UK business means two regulatory entities and, for a period, two technology stacks, so cross market feature parity is a promise rather than an existing state.
- Conversion is governed by each bank's own authentication experience, and Nordic BankID flows behave differently from UK app redirects, so a single UX cannot be assumed across the footprint.
Thunder Client
- Paid plans are billed annually only: Starter is $3 per user per month and capped at a maximum of 10 seats, Business is $7 per user per month with 500 monthly collection runs per user, and Enterprise is $16 per user per month for unlimited runs
Pricing, plan by plan
Neonomics
On request- Neonomics platform$undefined/year
- Quoted per customer, typically per initiated payment or per API call
- Volume commitments and monthly minimums are common
- Payment initiation only; merchant handles settlement and refunds
Thunder Client
Free- FreeFree
- REST client
- Collection management
- Local testing
- Pro$8/monthly
- Cloud sync
- Team collaboration
- Advanced features
Which should you pick?
Choose Neonomics if
- You need payment initiation.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want account information.
Choose Thunder Client if
- You need rest client.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on VSCode extension, Web.
- You also want environment variables.
Questions people ask
- Is Neonomics or Thunder Client better?
- Neither clearly leads. Neonomics starts at On request and Thunder Client at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Neonomics or Thunder Client?
- Thunder Client has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Neonomics and Free for Thunder Client.
- Does Neonomics or Thunder Client run on more platforms?
- Neonomics runs on Web, API. Thunder Client runs on VSCode extension, Web.
- Can I use Thunder Client for free?
- Yes. Thunder Client has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Neonomics starts at On request.
- What is Neonomics best used for?
- Neonomics is most often used for a norwegian or swedish merchant collecting payments directly from bank accounts to avoid card fees, a debt collection agency sending request to pay messages instead of chasing bank transfers manually, a software vendor embedding pay by bank into an accounting or invoicing product for nordic customers, a business needing both uk and nordic bank payment coverage from one supplier. Of those, a norwegian or swedish merchant collecting payments directly from bank accounts to avoid card fees and a debt collection agency sending request to pay messages instead of chasing bank transfers manually are not what Thunder Client is typically brought in for.
- What can Neonomics do that Thunder Client cannot?
- Neonomics covers Payment initiation, Account information, Nordic bank depth, UK coverage via Ordo. Thunder Client covers REST Client, Environment variables, Response testing, VSCode.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Neonomics: Is Neonomics authorised in the UK?
Yes, through the acquisition of Ordo, an FCA authorised open banking payments firm, approved by the FCA and the Norwegian regulator.
Thunder Client: How much does Thunder Client cost?
Thunder Client publishes a free plan at no cost, then Starter at $3, Business at $7 and Enterprise at $16, all priced annually.
SourceNeonomics: Does it support variable recurring payments?
Yes in the UK through the Ordo capability, subject to which banks support commercial VRP; support elsewhere is more limited.
Thunder Client: Is Thunder Client free?
Yes, there is a free plan. It is used through the Thunder Client extension for VS Code, available from the marketplace, with limits applied compared with the paid tiers.
SourceNeonomics: Does Neonomics hold merchant funds?
No. It initiates payments; settlement, reconciliation and refunds remain with the merchant or its payment provider.
Related pages
More on Thunder Client
Other head to heads
- Neonomics vs Token.io
- Neonomics vs TrueLayer
- Neonomics vs Tink
- Neonomics vs Enable Banking
- Neonomics vs Zimpler
- Neonomics vs Trustly
- Neonomics vs Fintecture
- Neonomics vs Salt Edge
- Neonomics vs Yodlee
- Neonomics vs Brite Payments
- Neonomics vs Tribe Payments
- Neonomics vs Volt
- Neonomics vs Pusher
- Neonomics vs Skyflow
- Neonomics vs Backbase
- Neonomics vs Enfuce
- Neonomics vs REST Client VSCode
- Neonomics vs PocketBase
- Neonomics vs Appwrite
- Neonomics vs Hasura
- Neonomics vs Sanity
- Neonomics vs Bruno
- Neonomics vs Paw
- Neonomics vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Neonomics vs HTTPie
- Neonomics vs Prisma
- Neonomics vs RapidAPI
- Neonomics vs 10x Banking
- Neonomics vs Bud Financial
- Neonomics vs Episode Six
- Neonomics vs Kong Gateway
- Neonomics vs Swagger
- Thunder Client vs Token.io
- Thunder Client vs TrueLayer
- Thunder Client vs Tink
- Thunder Client vs Enable Banking
- Thunder Client vs Zimpler
- Thunder Client vs Trustly
- Thunder Client vs Fintecture
- Thunder Client vs Salt Edge
- Thunder Client vs Yodlee
- Thunder Client vs Brite Payments
- Thunder Client vs Tribe Payments
- Thunder Client vs Volt
- Thunder Client vs Pusher
- Thunder Client vs Skyflow
- Thunder Client vs Backbase
- Thunder Client vs Enfuce
- Thunder Client vs REST Client VSCode
- Thunder Client vs PocketBase
- Thunder Client vs Appwrite
- Thunder Client vs Hasura
- Thunder Client vs Sanity
- Thunder Client vs Bruno
- Thunder Client vs Paw
- Thunder Client vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Thunder Client vs HTTPie
- Thunder Client vs Prisma
- Thunder Client vs RapidAPI
- Thunder Client vs 10x Banking
- Thunder Client vs Bud Financial
- Thunder Client vs Episode Six
- Thunder Client vs Kong Gateway
- Thunder Client vs Swagger
