Networking · head to head
Auvik vs ThousandEyes

Auvik
Networking
Cloud-based network monitoring and management priced by managed device count, quote-only
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

ThousandEyes
Networking
Internet and network path monitoring, owned by Cisco but still sold as a standalone product on its own annual contracts
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Auvik no pricing is published anywhere on the site; every number requires submitting a lead form and speaking to sales, which slows down basic vendor comparison; ThousandEyes cisco does not publish a current definitive rate card, so any price a buyer finds online is likely outdated and should be confirmed directly with sales before budgeting
- They diverge on capability: Auvik covers Automated network mapping, ThousandEyes covers Path visualisation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Auvik and ThousandEyes actually diverge.
| Attribute | Auvik | ThousandEyes |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | quote, per managed device | quote, unit-based consumption on annual or prepaid contracts |
| Platforms | Web | Web, API |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Networking).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Auvik
- Automated network mapping
- Configuration backup
- Multi-tenant MSP view
- Traffic insight
- Device-based billing with exclusions
Only in ThousandEyes
- Path visualisation
- Cloud, enterprise and endpoint agents
- Internet Insights
- Cisco ecosystem integration
- Unit-based consumption billing
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Auvik
- An MSP wanting a single SaaS platform to monitor and map multiple client networks with per-client segregationnot ThousandEyes
- An internal IT team wanting automatic, versioned configuration backup for switches and routers without managing that infrastructure themselvesnot ThousandEyes
- A network team wanting continuous, automatically updated network topology mapping rather than maintaining diagrams manuallynot ThousandEyes
- An organisation wanting traffic visibility by application without deploying a separate flow collectornot ThousandEyes
ThousandEyes
- A network operations team at a large enterprise needing to diagnose whether a performance problem sits inside their network, with an ISP, or at the destinationnot Auvik
- An organisation already standardised on Cisco networking wanting internet path monitoring that integrates with existing Cisco toolingnot Auvik
- A company needing endpoint agent testing from real employee devices to reproduce user-reported performance issuesnot Auvik
- An SRE team wanting aggregated internet outage and BGP visibility across a wide customer base rather than building that dataset themselvesnot Auvik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Auvik
- No pricing is published anywhere on the site; every number requires submitting a lead form and speaking to sales, which slows down basic vendor comparison
- Billing by managed device count means the total cost is not knowable in advance without first running an accurate device count against Auvik's specific inclusion and exclusion rules
- As a SaaS-only product with no on-premises option, an organisation loses monitoring visibility if its own internet connection to Auvik's cloud goes down at the same time as the incident it needs to diagnose
- MSP-focused multi-tenant packaging may include features an internal IT team monitoring only its own network does not need, while still pricing against that broader feature set
- Configuration backup and restore depend on Auvik correctly supporting the specific hardware models on a given network; less common vendors may have thinner support
- Volume discounts exist but are also not published, so an MSP scaling client count has no way to model margin impact before negotiating each contract renewal
ThousandEyes
- Cisco does not publish a current definitive rate card, so any price a buyer finds online is likely outdated and should be confirmed directly with sales before budgeting
- A 12-month minimum contract removes the option to trial the platform under real production load on a shorter commitment
- Unit-based consumption billing across different test types is not always intuitive to forecast, and usage can grow unpredictably as more tests and agents are added
- Since the Cisco acquisition, purchasing now runs through Cisco's broader enterprise sales and licensing process, which can be slower and less transparent than dealing with a smaller standalone vendor
- Deep Cisco ecosystem integration is a real advantage only for organisations already standardised on Cisco; it offers less differentiated value for a non-Cisco shop
- Endpoint agent pricing tiers (Essentials versus Advantage) gate meaningfully different capability, and choosing the wrong tier at signup can mean a contract renegotiation to get needed features
Pricing, plan by plan
Auvik
On request- Auvik$undefined/month
- Automated network mapping
- Configuration backup
- MSP multi-tenant packages available
ThousandEyes
On request- ThousandEyes$undefined/year
- Cloud and enterprise agent testing
- Endpoint agents
- Internet Insights
Which should you pick?
Choose ThousandEyes if
- You need path visualisation.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want cloud, enterprise and endpoint agents.
Questions people ask
- Is Auvik or ThousandEyes better?
- Neither clearly leads. Auvik starts at On request and ThousandEyes at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Auvik or ThousandEyes?
- Auvik starts at On request and ThousandEyes at On request.
- Does Auvik or ThousandEyes run on more platforms?
- Auvik runs on Web. ThousandEyes runs on Web, API.
- What is Auvik best used for?
- Auvik is most often used for an msp wanting a single saas platform to monitor and map multiple client networks with per-client segregation, an internal it team wanting automatic, versioned configuration backup for switches and routers without managing that infrastructure themselves, a network team wanting continuous, automatically updated network topology mapping rather than maintaining diagrams manually, an organisation wanting traffic visibility by application without deploying a separate flow collector. Of those, an msp wanting a single saas platform to monitor and map multiple client networks with per-client segregation and an internal it team wanting automatic, versioned configuration backup for switches and routers without managing that infrastructure themselves are not what ThousandEyes is typically brought in for.
- What can Auvik do that ThousandEyes cannot?
- Auvik covers Automated network mapping, Configuration backup, Multi-tenant MSP view, Traffic insight. ThousandEyes covers Path visualisation, Cloud, enterprise and endpoint agents, Internet Insights, Cisco ecosystem integration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Auvik: Is Auvik priced per network or per device?
Per device, according to Auvik's own FAQ; some device categories like access points and printers are monitored at no additional charge.
ThousandEyes: Is ThousandEyes still sold as a standalone product after the Cisco acquisition?
Yes, it remains a distinct, purchasable product line rather than being merged into another Cisco offering.
Auvik: Is there any published price?
No, all pricing is quote-only through a sales conversation.
ThousandEyes: Is there a published, current price list?
No, Cisco does not publish a definitive current rate card; historical unit prices exist online but should not be treated as confirmed 2026 pricing.
Auvik: Does Auvik require an on-premises server?
No, it is SaaS-delivered with a lightweight local collector rather than a full on-premises monitoring server.
ThousandEyes: What is the minimum contract length?
12 months.
Related pages
More on ThousandEyes
Other head to heads
- Auvik vs Domotz
- Auvik vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Auvik vs LibreNMS
- Auvik vs Kentik
- Auvik vs Zabbix
- Auvik vs Icinga
- Auvik vs OpenVPN
- Auvik vs Consul
- Auvik vs Tailscale
- Auvik vs Cisco Meraki
- Auvik vs HiveMQ
- Auvik vs Traefik
- Auvik vs ZeroTier
- Auvik vs Juniper Mist
- Auvik vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- Auvik vs Nebula
- Auvik vs ngrok
- Auvik vs Catchpoint
- Auvik vs Cloudflare
- Auvik vs Prometheus
- Auvik vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Auvik vs Headscale
- Auvik vs Netdata
- ThousandEyes vs Domotz
- ThousandEyes vs PRTG Network Monitor
- ThousandEyes vs LibreNMS
- ThousandEyes vs Kentik
- ThousandEyes vs Zabbix
- ThousandEyes vs Icinga
- ThousandEyes vs OpenVPN
- ThousandEyes vs Consul
- ThousandEyes vs Tailscale
- ThousandEyes vs Cisco Meraki
- ThousandEyes vs HiveMQ
- ThousandEyes vs Traefik
- ThousandEyes vs ZeroTier
- ThousandEyes vs Juniper Mist
- ThousandEyes vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- ThousandEyes vs Nebula
- ThousandEyes vs ngrok
- ThousandEyes vs Catchpoint
- ThousandEyes vs Cloudflare
- ThousandEyes vs Prometheus
- ThousandEyes vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- ThousandEyes vs Headscale
- ThousandEyes vs Netdata
