Cloud · head to head
Terragrunt vs Wasabi

Terragrunt
Cloud
The Open Source IaC Orchestrator Platform Teams Trust
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Terragrunt has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Terragrunt additional complexity layer on top of Terraform; Wasabi 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- They diverge on capability: Terragrunt covers Infrastructure orchestration, Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Terragrunt and Wasabi actually diverge.
| Attribute | Terragrunt | Wasabi |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $7.99/month |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | AWS, Azure, GCP | Web, API |
| Founded | Unknown | 2015 |
Identical on both: pricing model (Unknown), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Terragrunt
- Infrastructure orchestration
- Run Queue
- DRY configuration
- Automated hooks
- Infrastructure catalog
- Least-privilege access
Only in Wasabi
- Hot Cloud Storage
- S3 Compatible API
- Object Lock
- Versioning
- Multi-region
- Data Migration Tools
- Immutability
- Ransomware Protection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Terragrunt
- Organizing Terraform code across multiple environmentsnot Wasabi
- Automating infrastructure deployment workflowsnot Wasabi
- Implementing infrastructure as code templates for developer self-servicenot Wasabi
Wasabi
- Backup and recoverynot Terragrunt
- Media storagenot Terragrunt
- Archive replacementnot Terragrunt
- Ransomware protectionnot Terragrunt
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Terragrunt
- Additional complexity layer on top of Terraform
- Requires understanding of Terraform concepts
- Paid tier pricing not clearly published
Wasabi
- 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- Significantly smaller global footprint than AWS with only 16 regions, resulting in higher latency for users in underserved regions
- Performance can degrade with high-volume transactions requiring throughput management strategies
- Hot storage only, no cold/archival storage tier for long-term data at lower cost
- Support responsiveness gaps with teams experiencing multi-day waits for critical issue resolution
Pricing, plan by plan
Terragrunt
Free- Open SourceFree
- Terragrunt CLI - completely free
- Community support
- Terragrunt Scale FreeFree
- Free CI/CD pipeline
- Unlimited runs and resources
- For up to 25 infrastructure units
- Terragrunt Scale Paid$undefined/custom
- Volume pricing for more than 25 infrastructure units
- Enterprise support
Wasabi
$7.99/monthNo published plan breakdown. See the Wasabi review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Terragrunt if
- You need infrastructure orchestration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS, Azure, GCP.
- You also want run queue.
Choose Wasabi if
- You need hot cloud storage.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want s3 compatible api.
Questions people ask
- Is Terragrunt or Wasabi better?
- Neither clearly leads. Terragrunt starts at Free and Wasabi at $7.99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Terragrunt or Wasabi?
- Terragrunt has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Terragrunt and $7.99/month for Wasabi.
- Does Terragrunt or Wasabi run on more platforms?
- Terragrunt runs on AWS, Azure, GCP. Wasabi runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Terragrunt for free?
- Yes. Terragrunt has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Wasabi starts at $7.99/month.
- What is Terragrunt best used for?
- Terragrunt is most often used for organizing terraform code across multiple environments, automating infrastructure deployment workflows, implementing infrastructure as code templates for developer self-service. Of those, organizing terraform code across multiple environments and automating infrastructure deployment workflows are not what Wasabi is typically brought in for.
- What can Terragrunt do that Wasabi cannot?
- Terragrunt covers Infrastructure orchestration, Run Queue, DRY configuration, Automated hooks. Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage, S3 Compatible API, Object Lock, Versioning.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Terragrunt: Is Terragrunt free?
Yes, the Terragrunt CLI is completely free and open source. Terragrunt Scale offers a free tier for up to 25 infrastructure units.
SourceWasabi: What is Wasabi's pricing structure?
Wasabi offers pay-as-you-go pricing at $7.99 per TB per month as of July 2026, with no egress or API request fees. Reserved capacity plans are available for multi-year terms with volume discounts.
SourceTerragrunt: What is the difference between Terragrunt and Terraform?
Terragrunt is an orchestration layer on top of Terraform that handles state management, DRY principles, and deployment automation without replacing Terraform itself.
SourceWasabi: Does Wasabi charge for data downloads or API calls?
No. Wasabi includes zero egress fees and zero API request fees, which is a major cost advantage over AWS S3. Customers can plan their budget to the penny without worrying about surprise data transfer charges.
SourceWasabi: Is there a minimum storage duration requirement?
Yes. Wasabi enforces a 90-day minimum storage term. Users who delete data before 90 days are still charged for the full 90-day period.
SourceWasabi: Is Wasabi S3-compatible?
Yes. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage is fully S3-compatible, meaning organizations can integrate it into existing workflows without rewriting application code used with AWS S3.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Terragrunt vs Pulumi
- Terragrunt vs Infracost
- Terragrunt vs Packer
- Terragrunt vs Serverless Framework
- Terragrunt vs SST
- Terragrunt vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Terragrunt vs Cerebrium
- Terragrunt vs Go
- Terragrunt vs Rancher
- Terragrunt vs Anyscale
- Terragrunt vs Linkerd
- Terragrunt vs Microsoft Azure
- Terragrunt vs Nitric
- Terragrunt vs OpenEBS
- Terragrunt vs OVHcloud
- Terragrunt vs Nomad
- Terragrunt vs Vagrant
- Terragrunt vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Terragrunt vs DigitalOcean
- Terragrunt vs Hetzner Cloud
- Terragrunt vs Scaleway
- Terragrunt vs Linode
- Terragrunt vs Vultr
- Terragrunt vs Zeabur
- Terragrunt vs Porter
- Terragrunt vs Contabo
- Terragrunt vs Encore
- Terragrunt vs Google Cloud Platform
- Terragrunt vs HAProxy
- Terragrunt vs IBM Cloud
- Terragrunt vs kind
- Terragrunt vs Koyeb
- Terragrunt vs Kustomize
- Wasabi vs Pulumi
- Wasabi vs Infracost
- Wasabi vs Packer
- Wasabi vs Serverless Framework
- Wasabi vs SST
- Wasabi vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Wasabi vs Cerebrium
- Wasabi vs Go
- Wasabi vs Rancher
- Wasabi vs Anyscale
- Wasabi vs Linkerd
- Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure
- Wasabi vs Nitric
- Wasabi vs OpenEBS
- Wasabi vs OVHcloud
- Wasabi vs Nomad
- Wasabi vs Vagrant
- Wasabi vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Wasabi vs DigitalOcean
- Wasabi vs Hetzner Cloud
- Wasabi vs Scaleway
- Wasabi vs Linode
- Wasabi vs Vultr
- Wasabi vs Zeabur
- Wasabi vs Porter
- Wasabi vs Contabo
- Wasabi vs Encore
- Wasabi vs Google Cloud Platform
- Wasabi vs HAProxy
- Wasabi vs IBM Cloud
- Wasabi vs kind
- Wasabi vs Koyeb
- Wasabi vs Kustomize

