Cloud · head to head
Vagrant vs Wasabi
The short version
- Only Vagrant has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Vagrant vagrant 2.4.3 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence; Wasabi 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- They diverge on capability: Vagrant covers Box management, Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Vagrant and Wasabi actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Vagrant
- Box management
- Provider support
- Multi-machine setups
- Provisioners
- Networking
- Synced folders
- Snapshots
- Plugins
Only in Wasabi
- Hot Cloud Storage
- S3 Compatible API
- Object Lock
- Versioning
- Multi-region
- Data Migration Tools
- Immutability
- Ransomware Protection
Both cover
- Cloud deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Vagrant
- Reproducible local development environments defined in a Vagrantfilenot Wasabi
- Provisioning identical VMs across VirtualBox, VMware and Hyper-V for a teamnot Wasabi
- Sandboxing multi-machine setups on a developer laptopnot Wasabi
Wasabi
- Backup and recoverynot Vagrant
- Media storagenot Vagrant
- Archive replacementnot Vagrant
- Ransomware protectionnot Vagrant
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Vagrant
- Vagrant 2.4.3 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
- The Additional Use Grant forbids offering Vagrant to third parties on a hosted or embedded basis in a paid product that competes with IBM's paid versions of Vagrant
- Each version converts to the MPL 2.0 Change License only four years after that version is first published
- Uses that fall outside the Additional Use Grant require a separately negotiated licence from the licensor
Wasabi
- 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- Significantly smaller global footprint than AWS with only 16 regions, resulting in higher latency for users in underserved regions
- Performance can degrade with high-volume transactions requiring throughput management strategies
- Hot storage only, no cold/archival storage tier for long-term data at lower cost
- Support responsiveness gaps with teams experiencing multi-day waits for critical issue resolution
Pricing, plan by plan
Vagrant
Free- Open SourceFree
- Development environment provisioning
- Multiple providers
- Provisioner support
Wasabi
$7.99/monthNo published plan breakdown. See the Wasabi review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Vagrant if
- You need box management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac.
- You also want provider support.
Choose Wasabi if
- You need hot cloud storage.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want s3 compatible api.
Questions people ask
- Is Vagrant or Wasabi better?
- Neither clearly leads. Vagrant starts at Free and Wasabi at $7.99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Vagrant or Wasabi?
- Vagrant has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Vagrant and $7.99/month for Wasabi.
- Does Vagrant or Wasabi run on more platforms?
- Vagrant runs on Linux, Windows, Mac. Wasabi runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Vagrant for free?
- Yes. Vagrant has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Wasabi starts at $7.99/month.
- What is Vagrant best used for?
- Vagrant is most often used for reproducible local development environments defined in a vagrantfile, provisioning identical vms across virtualbox, vmware and hyper-v for a team, sandboxing multi-machine setups on a developer laptop. Of those, reproducible local development environments defined in a vagrantfile and provisioning identical vms across virtualbox, vmware and hyper-v for a team are not what Wasabi is typically brought in for.
- What can Vagrant do that Wasabi cannot?
- Vagrant covers Box management, Provider support, Multi-machine setups, Provisioners. Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage, S3 Compatible API, Object Lock, Versioning. Both handle Cloud deployment.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Vagrant: Is Vagrant free to use?
Vagrant is a free, open-source command-line utility for managing virtual machine lifecycles.
SourceWasabi: What is Wasabi's pricing structure?
Wasabi offers pay-as-you-go pricing at $7.99 per TB per month as of July 2026, with no egress or API request fees. Reserved capacity plans are available for multi-year terms with volume discounts.
SourceVagrant: Does Vagrant offer a paid tier?
Vagrant itself is free. HashiCorp offers a HCP Vagrant Registry with a free tier for use with Vagrant.
SourceWasabi: Does Wasabi charge for data downloads or API calls?
No. Wasabi includes zero egress fees and zero API request fees, which is a major cost advantage over AWS S3. Customers can plan their budget to the penny without worrying about surprise data transfer charges.
SourceWasabi: Is there a minimum storage duration requirement?
Yes. Wasabi enforces a 90-day minimum storage term. Users who delete data before 90 days are still charged for the full 90-day period.
SourceWasabi: Is Wasabi S3-compatible?
Yes. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage is fully S3-compatible, meaning organizations can integrate it into existing workflows without rewriting application code used with AWS S3.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Vagrant vs DigitalOcean
- Vagrant vs Neon
- Vagrant vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Vagrant vs Grafana Cloud
- Vagrant vs Pulumi
- Vagrant vs Portworx
- Vagrant vs Serverless Framework
- Vagrant vs Podman
- Vagrant vs Caddy
- Vagrant vs Rancher
- Vagrant vs Infracost
- Vagrant vs Porter
- Vagrant vs SST
- Vagrant vs Tencent Cloud
- Vagrant vs Terragrunt
- Vagrant vs Thanos
- Vagrant vs Zeabur
- Vagrant vs Zipkin
- Vagrant vs Hetzner Cloud
- Vagrant vs Scaleway
- Vagrant vs Linode
- Vagrant vs Vultr
- Vagrant vs Contabo
- Vagrant vs Encore
- Vagrant vs Google Cloud Platform
- Vagrant vs Microsoft Azure
- Vagrant vs HAProxy
- Vagrant vs IBM Cloud
- Vagrant vs kind
- Vagrant vs Koyeb
- Vagrant vs Kustomize
- Vagrant vs Linkerd
- Wasabi vs DigitalOcean
- Wasabi vs Neon
- Wasabi vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Wasabi vs Grafana Cloud
- Wasabi vs Pulumi
- Wasabi vs Portworx
- Wasabi vs Serverless Framework
- Wasabi vs Podman
- Wasabi vs Caddy
- Wasabi vs Rancher
- Wasabi vs Infracost
- Wasabi vs Porter
- Wasabi vs SST
- Wasabi vs Tencent Cloud
- Wasabi vs Terragrunt
- Wasabi vs Thanos
- Wasabi vs Zeabur
- Wasabi vs Zipkin
- Wasabi vs Hetzner Cloud
- Wasabi vs Scaleway
- Wasabi vs Linode
- Wasabi vs Vultr
- Wasabi vs Contabo
- Wasabi vs Encore
- Wasabi vs Google Cloud Platform
- Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure
- Wasabi vs HAProxy
- Wasabi vs IBM Cloud
- Wasabi vs kind
- Wasabi vs Koyeb
- Wasabi vs Kustomize
- Wasabi vs Linkerd


