Cloud · head to head
OVHcloud vs Wasabi
The short version
- Each has a real cost: OVHcloud public Cloud pricing table lists a scheduled price change with a column labeled Price on April 1, 2026, showing current rates are promotional and set to change on that date; Wasabi 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- They diverge on capability: OVHcloud covers Public Cloud, Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OVHcloud and Wasabi actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OVHcloud
- Public Cloud
- Private Cloud
- Bare Metal Servers
- Managed Kubernetes
- Object Storage
- Block Storage
- Load Balancers
- Databases
Only in Wasabi
- Hot Cloud Storage
- S3 Compatible API
- Object Lock
- Versioning
- Multi-region
- Data Migration Tools
- Immutability
- Ransomware Protection
Both cover
- SOC2
- Cloud deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OVHcloud
- Managed Kubernetes container orchestration for cloud-native applicationsnot Wasabi
- Virtual machine instances with customizable CPU, RAM, and IOPSnot Wasabi
- Object storage with S3-compatible API for scalable data archivalnot Wasabi
- Managed databases including PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB, and ClickHousenot Wasabi
- Private network connectivity with vRack for multi-AZ isolationnot Wasabi
Wasabi
- Backup and recoverynot OVHcloud
- Media storagenot OVHcloud
- Archive replacementnot OVHcloud
- Ransomware protectionnot OVHcloud
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OVHcloud
- Public Cloud pricing table lists a scheduled price change with a column labeled Price on April 1, 2026, showing current rates are promotional and set to change on that date
- Free network traffic and free Object Storage API calls exclude the Asia-Pacific region
Wasabi
- 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- Significantly smaller global footprint than AWS with only 16 regions, resulting in higher latency for users in underserved regions
- Performance can degrade with high-volume transactions requiring throughput management strategies
- Hot storage only, no cold/archival storage tier for long-term data at lower cost
- Support responsiveness gaps with teams experiencing multi-day waits for critical issue resolution
Pricing, plan by plan
OVHcloud
€3.5/month- Public Cloud Starter$3.5/month
- 1 vCPU
- 1 GB RAM
- 10 GB storage
- Bare Metal$49/month
- Dedicated hardware
- High performance
- Full control
Wasabi
$7.99/monthNo published plan breakdown. See the Wasabi review.
Which should you pick?
Choose OVHcloud if
- You need public cloud.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Api, Cli.
- You also want private cloud.
Choose Wasabi if
- You need hot cloud storage.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want s3 compatible api.
Questions people ask
- Is OVHcloud or Wasabi better?
- Neither clearly leads. OVHcloud starts at €3.5/month and Wasabi at $7.99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OVHcloud or Wasabi?
- OVHcloud starts at €3.5/month and Wasabi at $7.99/month.
- Does OVHcloud or Wasabi run on more platforms?
- OVHcloud runs on Linux, Windows, Api, Cli. Wasabi runs on Web, API.
- What is OVHcloud best used for?
- OVHcloud is most often used for managed kubernetes container orchestration for cloud-native applications, virtual machine instances with customizable cpu, ram, and iops, object storage with s3-compatible api for scalable data archival, managed databases including postgresql, mysql, mongodb, and clickhouse. Of those, managed kubernetes container orchestration for cloud-native applications and virtual machine instances with customizable cpu, ram, and iops are not what Wasabi is typically brought in for.
- What can OVHcloud do that Wasabi cannot?
- OVHcloud covers Public Cloud, Private Cloud, Bare Metal Servers, Managed Kubernetes. Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage, S3 Compatible API, Object Lock, Versioning. Both handle SOC2, Cloud deployment.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OVHcloud: How does OVHcloud charge for cloud services?
OVHcloud offers pay-as-you-go pricing for compute, storage, and bandwidth. Specific per-unit costs are accessed through the pricing calculator on the vendor site.
SourceWasabi: What is Wasabi's pricing structure?
Wasabi offers pay-as-you-go pricing at $7.99 per TB per month as of July 2026, with no egress or API request fees. Reserved capacity plans are available for multi-year terms with volume discounts.
SourceOVHcloud: Are there savings plans for OVHcloud services?
OVHcloud mentions savings plan options on its services pages, but pricing discounts and commitment terms are not detailed on the homepage.
SourceWasabi: Does Wasabi charge for data downloads or API calls?
No. Wasabi includes zero egress fees and zero API request fees, which is a major cost advantage over AWS S3. Customers can plan their budget to the penny without worrying about surprise data transfer charges.
SourceOVHcloud: What is the cost of OVHcloud zero inter-AZ fees?
OVHcloud advertises zero inter-AZ (availability zone) fees for data transfers within its network. Monthly subscription rates for individual services are not published on the vendor homepage.
SourceWasabi: Is there a minimum storage duration requirement?
Yes. Wasabi enforces a 90-day minimum storage term. Users who delete data before 90 days are still charged for the full 90-day period.
SourceWasabi: Is Wasabi S3-compatible?
Yes. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage is fully S3-compatible, meaning organizations can integrate it into existing workflows without rewriting application code used with AWS S3.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- OVHcloud vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- OVHcloud vs DigitalOcean
- OVHcloud vs Grafana Cloud
- OVHcloud vs Neon
- OVHcloud vs Scaleway
- OVHcloud vs Oracle Cloud
- OVHcloud vs IBM Cloud
- OVHcloud vs Lambda
- OVHcloud vs Vultr
- OVHcloud vs Alibaba Cloud
- OVHcloud vs Tencent Cloud
- OVHcloud vs Chef
- OVHcloud vs Rancher
- OVHcloud vs Upstash
- OVHcloud vs Azure Functions
- OVHcloud vs Deno Deploy
- OVHcloud vs Hetzner Cloud
- OVHcloud vs Infracost
- OVHcloud vs Linode
- OVHcloud vs Zeabur
- OVHcloud vs Porter
- OVHcloud vs Contabo
- OVHcloud vs Encore
- OVHcloud vs Google Cloud Platform
- OVHcloud vs Microsoft Azure
- OVHcloud vs HAProxy
- OVHcloud vs kind
- OVHcloud vs Koyeb
- OVHcloud vs Kustomize
- OVHcloud vs Linkerd
- Wasabi vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Wasabi vs DigitalOcean
- Wasabi vs Grafana Cloud
- Wasabi vs Neon
- Wasabi vs Scaleway
- Wasabi vs Oracle Cloud
- Wasabi vs IBM Cloud
- Wasabi vs Lambda
- Wasabi vs Vultr
- Wasabi vs Alibaba Cloud
- Wasabi vs Tencent Cloud
- Wasabi vs Chef
- Wasabi vs Rancher
- Wasabi vs Upstash
- Wasabi vs Azure Functions
- Wasabi vs Deno Deploy
- Wasabi vs Hetzner Cloud
- Wasabi vs Infracost
- Wasabi vs Linode
- Wasabi vs Zeabur
- Wasabi vs Porter
- Wasabi vs Contabo
- Wasabi vs Encore
- Wasabi vs Google Cloud Platform
- Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure
- Wasabi vs HAProxy
- Wasabi vs kind
- Wasabi vs Koyeb
- Wasabi vs Kustomize
- Wasabi vs Linkerd


