Browser Extensions · head to head
ColorZilla vs Tampermonkey
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ColorZilla no pricing information published on main website or pricing page, making cost structure unclear to potential users; Tampermonkey only source code up to version 2.9 is GPLv3; all newer versions are distributed under a proprietary license despite the extension itself being free to use
- They diverge on capability: ColorZilla covers Color picker, Tampermonkey covers Userscript management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ColorZilla and Tampermonkey actually diverge.
| Attribute | ColorZilla | Tampermonkey |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | free | open-source |
| Platforms | Chrome, Firefox, Edge | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, Android |
| Founded | 2007 | 2010 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Browser Extensions).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ColorZilla
- Color picker
- Eyedropper tool
- Gradient generator
- Palette analyzer
Only in Tampermonkey
- Userscript management
- Script editor
- Auto-update
- Cloud sync
- Safari support
- Opera support
Both cover
- Chrome support
- Firefox support
- Edge support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ColorZilla
- Extracting exact color values from website designs instantlynot Tampermonkey
- Generating CSS gradients without returning to Photoshopnot Tampermonkey
- Analyzing and converting visual color palettes to codenot Tampermonkey
Tampermonkey
- Auto-run custom JavaScript to add features to specific websitesnot ColorZilla
- Block ads, remove clutter, or reformat page layout via community/personal userscriptsnot ColorZilla
- Run scripts sourced from Greasy Fork or similar userscript repositoriesnot ColorZilla
- Automate repetitive web tasks such as form-filling or redirect skipping via installed scriptsnot ColorZilla
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ColorZilla
- No pricing information published on main website or pricing page, making cost structure unclear to potential users
- No free tier or trial option clearly advertised, limiting ability to test features before purchase
Tampermonkey
- Only source code up to version 2.9 is GPLv3; all newer versions are distributed under a proprietary license despite the extension itself being free to use
- Under Manifest V3, GM_webRequest is not (yet) supported
- Under Manifest V3, GM_xmlhttpRequest fires only one progress event instead of streaming progress, requiring a responseType: 'stream' workaround
- Since v5.3.2, Chrome/Edge (MV3) requires the user to manually enable Developer Mode, or from Chrome 138+ a per-extension 'Allow User Scripts' toggle, before any userscript will run
Pricing, plan by plan
ColorZilla
Free- FreeFree
- Color picker
- Eyedropper
- Gradient generator
Tampermonkey
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Tampermonkey review.
Which should you pick?
Choose ColorZilla if
- You need color picker.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Chrome, Firefox, Edge.
- You also want eyedropper tool.
Choose Tampermonkey if
- You need userscript management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, Android.
- You also want script editor.
Questions people ask
- Is ColorZilla or Tampermonkey better?
- Neither clearly leads. ColorZilla starts at Free and Tampermonkey at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ColorZilla or Tampermonkey?
- ColorZilla starts at Free and Tampermonkey at Free.
- Does ColorZilla or Tampermonkey run on more platforms?
- ColorZilla runs on Chrome, Firefox, Edge. Tampermonkey runs on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, Android.
- Can I use ColorZilla for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is ColorZilla best used for?
- ColorZilla is most often used for extracting exact color values from website designs instantly, generating css gradients without returning to photoshop, analyzing and converting visual color palettes to code. Of those, extracting exact color values from website designs instantly and generating css gradients without returning to photoshop are not what Tampermonkey is typically brought in for.
- What can ColorZilla do that Tampermonkey cannot?
- ColorZilla covers Color picker, Eyedropper tool, Gradient generator, Palette analyzer. Tampermonkey covers Userscript management, Script editor, Auto-update, Cloud sync. Both handle Chrome support, Firefox support, Edge support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ColorZilla: How much does ColorZilla cost?
ColorZilla does not publish pricing on its website. The site describes browser extensions for Firefox and Chrome, plus an online CSS gradient editor, but cost information is not available. Users must contact the company directly or check browser extension marketplaces for availability and cost details.
SourceTampermonkey: How much does Tampermonkey cost?
Tampermonkey is completely free for all versions and across all supported browsers including Chrome, Edge, Safari, Opera, and Firefox.
SourceColorZilla: Is ColorZilla free to use?
The website does not specify whether ColorZilla tools are free or paid. While browser extensions are often offered free in extension stores, the online tools and their pricing model are not documented on the main site.
SourceTampermonkey: Is Tampermonkey available on all browsers?
Yes, Tampermonkey is available on Chrome 120 and later, Microsoft Edge, Safari, Opera Next, and Firefox with no cost.
SourceRelated pages
More on Tampermonkey
Other head to heads
- ColorZilla vs Pocket
- ColorZilla vs Dark Reader
- ColorZilla vs Raindrop.io
- ColorZilla vs Privacy Badger
- ColorZilla vs WhatFont
- ColorZilla vs Night Eye
- ColorZilla vs Stylus
- ColorZilla vs Awesome Screenshot
- ColorZilla vs AdBlock Plus
- ColorZilla vs Evernote Web Clipper
- ColorZilla vs Instapaper
- ColorZilla vs SimilarWeb
- ColorZilla vs Vimeo Record
- ColorZilla vs Vue.js Devtools
- ColorZilla vs Web Developer
- ColorZilla vs Arc
- ColorZilla vs Fireshot
- ColorZilla vs Violentmonkey
- ColorZilla vs Keeper
- ColorZilla vs Momentum
- ColorZilla vs React Developer Tools
- ColorZilla vs Save to Google Drive
- Tampermonkey vs Pocket
- Tampermonkey vs Dark Reader
- Tampermonkey vs Raindrop.io
- Tampermonkey vs Privacy Badger
- Tampermonkey vs WhatFont
- Tampermonkey vs Night Eye
- Tampermonkey vs Stylus
- Tampermonkey vs Awesome Screenshot
- Tampermonkey vs AdBlock Plus
- Tampermonkey vs Evernote Web Clipper
- Tampermonkey vs Instapaper
- Tampermonkey vs SimilarWeb
- Tampermonkey vs Vimeo Record
- Tampermonkey vs Vue.js Devtools
- Tampermonkey vs Web Developer
- Tampermonkey vs Arc
- Tampermonkey vs Fireshot
- Tampermonkey vs Violentmonkey
- Tampermonkey vs Keeper
- Tampermonkey vs Momentum
- Tampermonkey vs React Developer Tools
- Tampermonkey vs Save to Google Drive


