Government · head to head
NEXGEN Asset Management vs Syft

NEXGEN Asset Management
Government
Combined EAM and CMMS for utilities and municipalities with Esri GIS at the centre of the asset register
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Syft
Cybersecurity
Generates a software bill of materials from images, filesystems and archives
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Syft has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: NEXGEN Asset Management pricing keys off asset count, so a routine GIS resegmentation that splits mains into more records can raise your subscription without adding a single user or work order.; Syft lockfile parsing can drop packages silently. An open issue filed in August 2026 reports the yarn v1 cataloguer returning 118 of 745 packages with no error raised, which means a complete bill of materials and an 84 percent incomplete one look identical to the caller.
- They diverge on capability: NEXGEN Asset Management covers Esri GIS integration, Syft covers Multi-format output.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which NEXGEN Asset Management and Syft actually diverge.
| Attribute | NEXGEN Asset Management | Syft |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Open source, no licence fee |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker |
| Category | Government | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in NEXGEN Asset Management
- Esri GIS integration
- Risk and criticality
- Condition assessment
- Capital planning
- Work orders
- Mobile field app
- Service requests
- Inventory and purchasing
Only in Syft
- Multi-format output
- Broad ecosystem coverage
- Binary classifiers
- In-toto attestations
- Library and CLI
- Pairs with Grype
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
NEXGEN Asset Management
- A water utility that must show a board why a specific main is being replaced this year rather than nextnot Syft
- A city public works department consolidating a GIS asset inventory and a paper work order process into one systemnot Syft
- An airport authority tracking condition assessments across airside and landside assets with capital forecastingnot Syft
- A district that needs citizen service requests to become tracked work orders with an auditable historynot Syft
Syft
- Producing a bill of materials for a customer or regulator that requires onenot NEXGEN Asset Management
- Feeding an inventory into a vulnerability scanner rather than scanning images directlynot NEXGEN Asset Management
- Recording what shipped in a build so a future disclosure can be answered quicklynot NEXGEN Asset Management
- Public sector work where an SBOM is a contractual deliverablenot NEXGEN Asset Management
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
NEXGEN Asset Management
- Pricing keys off asset count, so a routine GIS resegmentation that splits mains into more records can raise your subscription without adding a single user or work order.
- Nothing is published and the vendor is small, so the reference set you can call is limited and mostly Californian and North American public agencies.
- The interface is dated compared with modern CMMS products, which hurts adoption among field crews who compare it to consumer apps on their own phones.
- GIS integration is the product strength and also its dependency; agencies without a maintained ArcGIS asset layer face a data preparation project before NEXGEN is useful.
- As a small vendor it carries acquisition risk, and in this segment acquisitions have repeatedly meant a product frozen while it is folded into a larger portfolio.
Syft
- Lockfile parsing can drop packages silently. An open issue filed in August 2026 reports the yarn v1 cataloguer returning 118 of 745 packages with no error raised, which means a complete bill of materials and an 84 percent incomplete one look identical to the caller.
- Fidelity varies sharply by ecosystem. Conan for C and C++, Haskell and Terraform get cataloguer support with no licence data, no dependency relationships and no file ownership, so a C and C++ shop gets the least from it.
- Binary classification yields no licence or dependency metadata, and vendored or statically linked code is exactly where supply chain risk hides, so the blind spot and the risk overlap.
- Incorrect CPE values and CPE collisions are recorded as open issues, and since Grype matches on CPE and PURL, an inventory error becomes a false negative in the security report downstream.
- An inventory is not a risk assessment. Even a perfect bill of materials says a vulnerable version is present, never that the vulnerable function is called, and the triage burden lands entirely on the reader.
Pricing, plan by plan
NEXGEN Asset Management
On request- NEXGEN Asset Management$undefined/year
- Tiered pricing based on the number of assets under management
- Implementation, GIS integration and data migration quoted separately
- Mobile module licensed alongside the core platform
Syft
Free- SyftFree
- Apache-2.0
- No usage limits
- Community support
- Anchore Enterprise$undefined/year
- Policy enforcement and reporting
- Federal and commercial tiers
- Pricing not published, quoted on request
Which should you pick?
Choose NEXGEN Asset Management if
- You need esri gis integration.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want risk and criticality.
Choose Syft if
- You need multi-format output.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- You also want broad ecosystem coverage.
Questions people ask
- Is NEXGEN Asset Management or Syft better?
- Neither clearly leads. NEXGEN Asset Management starts at On request and Syft at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, NEXGEN Asset Management or Syft?
- Syft has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for NEXGEN Asset Management and Free for Syft.
- Does NEXGEN Asset Management or Syft run on more platforms?
- NEXGEN Asset Management runs on Web, iOS, Android. Syft runs on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- Can I use Syft for free?
- Yes. Syft has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. NEXGEN Asset Management starts at On request.
- What is NEXGEN Asset Management best used for?
- NEXGEN Asset Management is most often used for a water utility that must show a board why a specific main is being replaced this year rather than next, a city public works department consolidating a gis asset inventory and a paper work order process into one system, an airport authority tracking condition assessments across airside and landside assets with capital forecasting, a district that needs citizen service requests to become tracked work orders with an auditable history. Of those, a water utility that must show a board why a specific main is being replaced this year rather than next and a city public works department consolidating a gis asset inventory and a paper work order process into one system are not what Syft is typically brought in for.
- What can NEXGEN Asset Management do that Syft cannot?
- NEXGEN Asset Management covers Esri GIS integration, Risk and criticality, Condition assessment, Capital planning. Syft covers Multi-format output, Broad ecosystem coverage, Binary classifiers, In-toto attestations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
NEXGEN Asset Management: How is NEXGEN priced?
On a tiered model based on the number of assets under management, quoted per agency. Nothing is published.
Syft: Does Syft find vulnerabilities?
No. It produces an inventory. Grype, from the same company, matches that inventory against vulnerability feeds. They are separate tools and the distinction is frequently lost.
NEXGEN Asset Management: Do we need Esri ArcGIS?
Not strictly, but the product is designed around it and most of the value assumes a maintained GIS asset layer.
Syft: Does anything in the Anchore stack do reachability analysis?
No. Neither Syft, Grype nor the commercial Anchore platform performs call graph or reachability analysis, so none of them tells you whether a vulnerable code path is actually invoked.
NEXGEN Asset Management: Does it handle capital planning?
Yes. Risk, criticality and condition scores feed multi-year renewal forecasts intended for board and council submissions.
Syft: Is it a CNCF or OpenSSF project?
No. It is single-vendor open source owned by Anchore, with no foundation governance. That is a different licence risk profile from Sigstore.
NEXGEN Asset Management: Is there a mobile app?
Yes, a map-based field application with offline capability, licensed alongside the core platform.
Syft: What does Anchore Enterprise cost?
Not published. The pricing page is contact-sales only, with named but unpriced commercial and federal tiers.
Syft: How do I know my SBOM is complete?
You largely cannot, which is the honest answer. Silent partial parsing is a known open defect, so a bill of materials used for compliance should be spot-checked against a known dependency list.
Related pages
More on NEXGEN Asset Management
Other head to heads
- NEXGEN Asset Management vs VUEWorks
- NEXGEN Asset Management vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- NEXGEN Asset Management vs CentralSquare Asset Management
- NEXGEN Asset Management vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- NEXGEN Asset Management vs CityView
- NEXGEN Asset Management vs RecDesk
- NEXGEN Asset Management vs DataSF
- NEXGEN Asset Management vs MyRec.com
- NEXGEN Asset Management vs Bonfire
- NEXGEN Asset Management vs GovPilot
- NEXGEN Asset Management vs OpenGov
- NEXGEN Asset Management vs Euna Solutions
- NEXGEN Asset Management vs mySidewalk
- NEXGEN Asset Management vs NEOGOV
- NEXGEN Asset Management vs Nextdoor for Government
- NEXGEN Asset Management vs OpenCities
- NEXGEN Asset Management vs Oracle Government Cloud
- NEXGEN Asset Management vs Palantir Gotham
- NEXGEN Asset Management vs Cosign
- NEXGEN Asset Management vs Sigstore
- NEXGEN Asset Management vs Trivy
- NEXGEN Asset Management vs Chainguard
- NEXGEN Asset Management vs Metasploit
- NEXGEN Asset Management vs Wireshark
- NEXGEN Asset Management vs Semgrep
- NEXGEN Asset Management vs Legit Security
- NEXGEN Asset Management vs OWASP ZAP
- NEXGEN Asset Management vs HashiCorp Vault
- NEXGEN Asset Management vs Bitwarden
- NEXGEN Asset Management vs Infisical
- NEXGEN Asset Management vs Tenable Nessus
- NEXGEN Asset Management vs Transmit Security
- NEXGEN Asset Management vs TrustArc
- NEXGEN Asset Management vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- NEXGEN Asset Management vs VMware Carbon Black
- Syft vs VUEWorks
- Syft vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- Syft vs CentralSquare Asset Management
- Syft vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Syft vs CityView
- Syft vs RecDesk
- Syft vs DataSF
- Syft vs MyRec.com
- Syft vs Bonfire
- Syft vs GovPilot
- Syft vs OpenGov
- Syft vs Euna Solutions
- Syft vs mySidewalk
- Syft vs NEOGOV
- Syft vs Nextdoor for Government
- Syft vs OpenCities
- Syft vs Oracle Government Cloud
- Syft vs Palantir Gotham
- Syft vs Cosign
- Syft vs Sigstore
- Syft vs Trivy
- Syft vs Chainguard
- Syft vs Metasploit
- Syft vs Wireshark
- Syft vs Semgrep
- Syft vs Legit Security
- Syft vs OWASP ZAP
- Syft vs HashiCorp Vault
- Syft vs Bitwarden
- Syft vs Infisical
- Syft vs Tenable Nessus
- Syft vs Transmit Security
- Syft vs TrustArc
- Syft vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Syft vs VMware Carbon Black
