Cybersecurity · head to head
DTiQ vs Sumsub

DTiQ
Cybersecurity
Managed video loss prevention with human auditors for restaurants, convenience stores and retail
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Sumsub
Cybersecurity
Identity verification and AML screening priced per verification
- From
- $1.35/verification
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: DTiQ you are buying labour, so the cost per site is far higher than a self-service video licence and it does not fall as camera prices do.; Sumsub the published per-verification rate is undercut by a monthly minimum of 149 or 299 dollars, so low volume businesses pay a much higher effective rate than the headline suggests.
- They diverge on capability: DTiQ covers SmartAudit, Sumsub covers Document verification.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which DTiQ and Sumsub actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in DTiQ
- SmartAudit
- POS transaction linking
- 360iQ platform
- Exception alerting
- Drive-through timing
- Food safety and compliance checks
- Managed installation
Only in Sumsub
- Document verification
- AML screening
- KYB verification
- No-code flow builder
- Transaction monitoring
- Travel Rule
- Fraud and duplicate detection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
DTiQ
- A multi-unit quick service franchisee who has no one available to review video across fifteen storesnot Sumsub
- A convenience store chain investigating till fraud by matching voids to what actually happened at the counternot Sumsub
- An operator enforcing drive-through service time standards across locations from evidence rather than anecdotenot Sumsub
- A brand auditing food safety and cleanliness compliance at franchise sites without sending a field managernot Sumsub
Sumsub
- A crypto exchange needing KYC plus Travel Rule handling under one contractnot DTiQ
- A gambling operator entering several European markets and needing document coverage without a separate vendor per countrynot DTiQ
- A fintech that wants a published price it can model in a business case before speaking to a salespersonnot DTiQ
- A marketplace verifying both individual sellers and the companies behind them without buying two productsnot DTiQ
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
DTiQ
- You are buying labour, so the cost per site is far higher than a self-service video licence and it does not fall as camera prices do.
- Audits are sampled, not continuous, so a problem outside the reviewed window is invisible and the score is a statistical impression rather than a complete record.
- Nothing is published on price and the commercial shape is a multi-year managed service agreement, which is harder to exit than a software subscription and typically involves bundled hardware you do not own.
- Ownership changed in a $200 million Digital Alpha led investment tied to a Cisco Meraki partnership, so the hardware and network roadmap may shift under an existing estate.
- It is built around restaurant, convenience and retail operating models, so an organisation outside those verticals gets a generic video product and pays for an audit methodology that does not fit its work.
Sumsub
- The published per-verification rate is undercut by a monthly minimum of 149 or 299 dollars, so low volume businesses pay a much higher effective rate than the headline suggests.
- You are billed per verification attempt in most configurations, meaning applicant drop-off and resubmissions cost money without producing a customer.
- Pass rates and document support vary noticeably by country, and a market that works well in Europe can produce materially worse rejection rates in parts of Africa and South East Asia.
- The AML screening tier bundles list coverage that large institutions would normally buy separately and tune, giving less control over match thresholds than a dedicated screening vendor.
- The company originated in Russia before restructuring to a UK entity, and some financial institutions still raise that history in vendor risk review, which can slow or block procurement at conservative banks.
Pricing, plan by plan
DTiQ
On request- DTiQ managed service$undefined/month
- Priced per location as a managed service, not per camera
- Audit frequency and scope determine the rate
- Hardware and installation bundled into the service agreement
Sumsub
$1.35/verification- Basic$1.35/verification
- 149 USD minimum monthly spend
- Document verification and liveness
- No-code flow builder
- Compliance$1.85/verification
- 299 USD minimum monthly spend
- Everything in Basic
- AML sanctions and PEP screening
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Negotiated volume rate
- Custom jurisdictions and languages
- Dedicated support
Which should you pick?
Choose DTiQ if
- You need smartaudit.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want pos transaction linking.
Choose Sumsub if
- You need document verification.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want aml screening.
Questions people ask
- Is DTiQ or Sumsub better?
- Neither clearly leads. DTiQ starts at On request and Sumsub at $1.35/verification, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, DTiQ or Sumsub?
- DTiQ starts at On request and Sumsub at $1.35/verification.
- Does DTiQ or Sumsub run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is DTiQ best used for?
- DTiQ is most often used for a multi-unit quick service franchisee who has no one available to review video across fifteen stores, a convenience store chain investigating till fraud by matching voids to what actually happened at the counter, an operator enforcing drive-through service time standards across locations from evidence rather than anecdote, a brand auditing food safety and cleanliness compliance at franchise sites without sending a field manager. Of those, a multi-unit quick service franchisee who has no one available to review video across fifteen stores and a convenience store chain investigating till fraud by matching voids to what actually happened at the counter are not what Sumsub is typically brought in for.
- What can DTiQ do that Sumsub cannot?
- DTiQ covers SmartAudit, POS transaction linking, 360iQ platform, Exception alerting. Sumsub covers Document verification, AML screening, KYB verification, No-code flow builder.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
DTiQ: Is DTiQ a video management system?
Not primarily. It is a managed service where human auditors review your footage and deliver scored reports. The platform exists to support that service.
Sumsub: What does a verification actually cost?
1.35 USD on Basic and 1.85 USD on Compliance, but with 149 and 299 USD monthly minimums respectively. Below roughly 110 or 160 checks a month you are paying the minimum, not the rate.
DTiQ: How is it priced?
Per location as a managed service, based on audit scope and frequency, with hardware and installation bundled. Nothing is published.
Sumsub: Do failed verifications get charged?
Attempts are generally billable, so a poor onboarding funnel raises your bill. Confirm the exact resubmission policy in your contract.
DTiQ: Who owns DTiQ?
Digital Alpha holds a majority stake following a $200 million investment that bought out Bain Capital, BV Investment Partners and others, alongside a Cisco Meraki partnership.
Sumsub: Does it cover business verification?
Yes, KYB with company registry lookups and beneficial owner resolution is part of the platform rather than a separate product.
DTiQ: Does it integrate with my POS?
Yes, with major restaurant and convenience store point of sale systems, which is what allows transaction exceptions to be replayed on video.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- DTiQ vs Rhombus Systems
- DTiQ vs Salient CompleteView
- DTiQ vs Spot AI
- DTiQ vs Envysion
- DTiQ vs March Networks
- DTiQ vs Eagle Eye Networks
- DTiQ vs Camio
- DTiQ vs BigID
- DTiQ vs NICE Actimize
- DTiQ vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- DTiQ vs Proofpoint
- DTiQ vs Genetec Security Center
- DTiQ vs Endor Labs
- DTiQ vs Enpass
- DTiQ vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- DTiQ vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- DTiQ vs Fortinet FortiGate
- DTiQ vs HID Global
- DTiQ vs Shufti Pro
- DTiQ vs Jumio
- DTiQ vs Socure
- DTiQ vs Signicat
- DTiQ vs iDenfy
- DTiQ vs Trulioo
- DTiQ vs Veriff
- DTiQ vs IDnow
- DTiQ vs Quantexa
- DTiQ vs Fenergo
- DTiQ vs Yoti
- DTiQ vs Microsoft Sentinel
- DTiQ vs Mimecast
- DTiQ vs Motorola Vigilant
- DTiQ vs Nessus
- DTiQ vs NordPass
- DTiQ vs One Identity
- Sumsub vs Rhombus Systems
- Sumsub vs Salient CompleteView
- Sumsub vs Spot AI
- Sumsub vs Envysion
- Sumsub vs March Networks
- Sumsub vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Sumsub vs Camio
- Sumsub vs BigID
- Sumsub vs NICE Actimize
- Sumsub vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Sumsub vs Proofpoint
- Sumsub vs Genetec Security Center
- Sumsub vs Endor Labs
- Sumsub vs Enpass
- Sumsub vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Sumsub vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Sumsub vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Sumsub vs HID Global
- Sumsub vs Shufti Pro
- Sumsub vs Jumio
- Sumsub vs Socure
- Sumsub vs Signicat
- Sumsub vs iDenfy
- Sumsub vs Trulioo
- Sumsub vs Veriff
- Sumsub vs IDnow
- Sumsub vs Quantexa
- Sumsub vs Fenergo
- Sumsub vs Yoti
- Sumsub vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Sumsub vs Mimecast
- Sumsub vs Motorola Vigilant
- Sumsub vs Nessus
- Sumsub vs NordPass
- Sumsub vs One Identity
