Developer Tools · head to head
Sourcegraph vs Tenable

Sourcegraph
Developer Tools
Code search and intelligence platform for large codebases with Cody AI assistant
- From
- $16000/year
- Free plan
- No

Tenable
Cybersecurity
AI-powered exposure management platform for unified security visibility
- From
- $3500/year
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Sourcegraph enterprise pricing starting at $16k annually creates significant barrier for small teams; Tenable pricing starts at $3500/year for Tenable One VM, expensive for small organizations
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Sourcegraph and Tenable actually diverge.
| Attribute | Sourcegraph | Tenable |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $16000/year | $3500/year |
| Platforms | Cloud, Self-hosted | Cloud, Web |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Sourcegraph
Nothing recorded that Tenable does not also cover.
Only in Tenable
- Unified attack surface mapping
- Exposure intelligence enrichment
- Tenable Hexa AI orchestration
- Cloud Exposure (CNAPP)
- OT Exposure
- Identity Exposure
- Vulnerability Management
- Attack Surface Management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Sourcegraph
- Large-scale code migrations across hundreds of repositoriesnot Tenable
- Enterprise governance and code ownership trackingnot Tenable
- AI-assisted bug hunting and security pattern detectionnot Tenable
- Onboarding engineers into large unfamiliar codebasesnot Tenable
- Regulatory compliance and code audit trailsnot Tenable
Tenable
- Comprehensive vulnerability scanning for enterprise networksnot Sourcegraph
- Cloud security monitoring and compliance for AWS, Azure, GCPnot Sourcegraph
- Identity and access management risk assessmentnot Sourcegraph
- Operational technology security for industrial systemsnot Sourcegraph
- Attack surface management for third-party risknot Sourcegraph
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Sourcegraph
- Enterprise pricing starting at $16k annually creates significant barrier for small teams
- No free tier or standard plan published; all options require custom sales engagement
- Complex enterprise-only positioning limits adoption compared to GitHub Copilot's pervasiveness
- Requires indexing entire codebase; not suitable for small or ephemeral projects
Tenable
- Pricing starts at $3500/year for Tenable One VM, expensive for small organizations
- Many enterprise features require custom quote and sales engagement
- Cloud Exposure, OT Exposure, and other modules have no published pricing
- Multi-year contracts common, limiting flexibility
- Setup and configuration complexity for enterprise deployments
Pricing, plan by plan
Sourcegraph
$16000/year- Enterprise$16000/year
- Scales with team size
- Credits for AI features per user
- Deep Search
Tenable
$3500/year- Tenable One Vulnerability Management$3500/year
- Per 100 assets
- Multi-year discounts available
- Tenable One Web App Scanning$3578/year
- Per 5 FQDNs
- Annual subscription
- Nessus Professional$4790/year
- Vulnerability scanning
- Multi-year discounts available
- Optional advanced support: $400/year
- Nessus Expert$6790/year
- Advanced vulnerability scanning
- Multi-year discounts available
- Optional advanced support: $400/year
Which should you pick?
Choose Tenable if
- You need unified attack surface mapping.
- You work on Cloud, Web.
- You also want exposure intelligence enrichment.
Questions people ask
- Is Sourcegraph or Tenable better?
- Neither clearly leads. Sourcegraph starts at $16000/year and Tenable at $3500/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Sourcegraph or Tenable?
- Sourcegraph starts at $16000/year and Tenable at $3500/year.
- Does Sourcegraph or Tenable run on more platforms?
- Sourcegraph runs on Cloud, Self-hosted. Tenable runs on Cloud, Web.
- What is Sourcegraph best used for?
- Sourcegraph is most often used for large-scale code migrations across hundreds of repositories, enterprise governance and code ownership tracking, ai-assisted bug hunting and security pattern detection, onboarding engineers into large unfamiliar codebases. Of those, large-scale code migrations across hundreds of repositories and enterprise governance and code ownership tracking are not what Tenable is typically brought in for.
- What can Sourcegraph do that Tenable cannot?
- Tenable covers Unified attack surface mapping, Exposure intelligence enrichment, Tenable Hexa AI orchestration, Cloud Exposure (CNAPP).
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Tenable: How is Tenable One pricing structured?
Tenable One Vulnerability Management costs $3500/year per 100 assets. Web App Scanning is $3578/year per 5 FQDNs. Multi-year discounts are available.
SourceTenable: What is the difference between Nessus Professional and Nessus Expert?
Nessus Professional costs $4790/year and provides core vulnerability scanning. Nessus Expert costs $6790/year and offers advanced scanning capabilities.
SourceTenable: Are custom support and training available for Tenable?
Yes. Optional advanced support is available for $400/year. Training courses range from $275-$385/year.
SourceRelated pages
More on Sourcegraph
Other head to heads
- Sourcegraph vs Visual Studio Code
- Sourcegraph vs ESLint
- Sourcegraph vs pnpm
- Sourcegraph vs Turborepo
- Sourcegraph vs Cody
- Sourcegraph vs Sweep
- Sourcegraph vs Bazel
- Sourcegraph vs GitHub Copilot
- Sourcegraph vs Moonrepo
- Sourcegraph vs Nixpacks
- Sourcegraph vs Pieces for Developers
- Sourcegraph vs Rust
- Sourcegraph vs Fig
- Sourcegraph vs Frappe
- Sourcegraph vs Git
- Sourcegraph vs GoLand
- Sourcegraph vs Hookdeck
- Sourcegraph vs JFrog Artifactory
- Sourcegraph vs Netwrix
- Sourcegraph vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Sourcegraph vs Qualys VMDR
- Sourcegraph vs Aikido
- Sourcegraph vs Arnica
- Sourcegraph vs Doppler
- Sourcegraph vs Chainguard
- Sourcegraph vs Recorded Future
- Sourcegraph vs Speakeasy
- Sourcegraph vs Sysdig
- Sourcegraph vs Endor Labs
- Sourcegraph vs Tanium
- Sourcegraph vs Enpass
- Sourcegraph vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Sourcegraph vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Sourcegraph vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Sourcegraph vs HID Global
- Sourcegraph vs IBM QRadar
- Tenable vs Visual Studio Code
- Tenable vs ESLint
- Tenable vs pnpm
- Tenable vs Turborepo
- Tenable vs Cody
- Tenable vs Sweep
- Tenable vs Bazel
- Tenable vs GitHub Copilot
- Tenable vs Moonrepo
- Tenable vs Nixpacks
- Tenable vs Pieces for Developers
- Tenable vs Rust
- Tenable vs Fig
- Tenable vs Frappe
- Tenable vs Git
- Tenable vs GoLand
- Tenable vs Hookdeck
- Tenable vs JFrog Artifactory
- Tenable vs Netwrix
- Tenable vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Tenable vs Qualys VMDR
- Tenable vs Aikido
- Tenable vs Arnica
- Tenable vs Doppler
- Tenable vs Chainguard
- Tenable vs Recorded Future
- Tenable vs Speakeasy
- Tenable vs Sysdig
- Tenable vs Endor Labs
- Tenable vs Tanium
- Tenable vs Enpass
- Tenable vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Tenable vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Tenable vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Tenable vs HID Global
- Tenable vs IBM QRadar
