Developer Tools · head to head
Hookdeck vs Tenable

Hookdeck
Developer Tools
Event gateway that receives, queues, retries and replays inbound webhooks
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Tenable
Cybersecurity
AI-powered exposure management platform for unified security visibility
- From
- $3500/year
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Hookdeck has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Hookdeck pricing meters delivered events, so fan-out multiplies the bill: one inbound event routed to four services counts as four deliveries.; Tenable pricing starts at $3500/year for Tenable One VM, expensive for small organizations
- They diverge on capability: Hookdeck covers Ingest and persist, Tenable covers Unified attack surface mapping.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Hookdeck and Tenable actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Hookdeck
- Ingest and persist
- Automatic retries
- Filters and fan-out
- Transformations
- Local development CLI
- Rate limiting
Only in Tenable
- Unified attack surface mapping
- Exposure intelligence enrichment
- Tenable Hexa AI orchestration
- Cloud Exposure (CNAPP)
- OT Exposure
- Identity Exposure
- Vulnerability Management
- Attack Surface Management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Hookdeck
- A payments integration where losing a Stripe event during a deploy causes an order to go unfulfillednot Tenable
- Fanning one provider webhook out to several internal services without each subscribing separatelynot Tenable
- Debugging a partner integration by replaying the exact failing payload after shipping a fixnot Tenable
- Receiving production-shaped webhooks on a developer laptop without running a public tunnelnot Tenable
Tenable
- Comprehensive vulnerability scanning for enterprise networksnot Hookdeck
- Cloud security monitoring and compliance for AWS, Azure, GCPnot Hookdeck
- Identity and access management risk assessmentnot Hookdeck
- Operational technology security for industrial systemsnot Hookdeck
- Attack surface management for third-party risknot Hookdeck
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Hookdeck
- Pricing meters delivered events, so fan-out multiplies the bill: one inbound event routed to four services counts as four deliveries.
- Free-tier retention is three days, which is shorter than the time it typically takes to notice a failing integration, so the payloads needed for a replay are often already gone.
- It becomes a single point of failure in front of every third-party integration, and an outage there means every provider webhook queues or fails at once.
- The transformation layer runs JavaScript in a constrained environment, so anything that needs a database lookup or an external call has to happen downstream instead.
- For a team already running Kafka or SQS the value is mostly the console and the replay UI, which is a hard cost to justify against infrastructure they already operate.
Tenable
- Pricing starts at $3500/year for Tenable One VM, expensive for small organizations
- Many enterprise features require custom quote and sales engagement
- Cloud Exposure, OT Exposure, and other modules have no published pricing
- Multi-year contracts common, limiting flexibility
- Setup and configuration complexity for enterprise deployments
Pricing, plan by plan
Hookdeck
Free- DeveloperFree
- Up to ten thousand events per month
- Three-day retention
- One user
- Team$39/month
- Ten thousand events included
- Unlimited users
- Pay as you go metering above the included events
- Growth$499/month
- Ten thousand events included plus metered usage
- Thirty-day retention
- Uptime and latency SLAs
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Negotiated event volume
- Custom retention
- Dedicated support
Tenable
$3500/year- Tenable One Vulnerability Management$3500/year
- Per 100 assets
- Multi-year discounts available
- Tenable One Web App Scanning$3578/year
- Per 5 FQDNs
- Annual subscription
- Nessus Professional$4790/year
- Vulnerability scanning
- Multi-year discounts available
- Optional advanced support: $400/year
- Nessus Expert$6790/year
- Advanced vulnerability scanning
- Multi-year discounts available
- Optional advanced support: $400/year
Which should you pick?
Choose Hookdeck if
- You need ingest and persist.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want automatic retries.
Choose Tenable if
- You need unified attack surface mapping.
- You work on Cloud, Web.
- You also want exposure intelligence enrichment.
Questions people ask
- Is Hookdeck or Tenable better?
- Neither clearly leads. Hookdeck starts at Free and Tenable at $3500/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Hookdeck or Tenable?
- Hookdeck has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Hookdeck and $3500/year for Tenable.
- Does Hookdeck or Tenable run on more platforms?
- Hookdeck runs on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows. Tenable runs on Cloud, Web.
- Can I use Hookdeck for free?
- Yes. Hookdeck has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Tenable starts at $3500/year.
- What is Hookdeck best used for?
- Hookdeck is most often used for a payments integration where losing a stripe event during a deploy causes an order to go unfulfilled, fanning one provider webhook out to several internal services without each subscribing separately, debugging a partner integration by replaying the exact failing payload after shipping a fix, receiving production-shaped webhooks on a developer laptop without running a public tunnel. Of those, a payments integration where losing a stripe event during a deploy causes an order to go unfulfilled and fanning one provider webhook out to several internal services without each subscribing separately are not what Tenable is typically brought in for.
- What can Hookdeck do that Tenable cannot?
- Hookdeck covers Ingest and persist, Automatic retries, Filters and fan-out, Transformations. Tenable covers Unified attack surface mapping, Exposure intelligence enrichment, Tenable Hexa AI orchestration, Cloud Exposure (CNAPP).
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Hookdeck: Is there a free plan?
Yes, ten thousand events a month with three-day retention and one user.
Tenable: How is Tenable One pricing structured?
Tenable One Vulnerability Management costs $3500/year per 100 assets. Web App Scanning is $3578/year per 5 FQDNs. Multi-year discounts are available.
SourceHookdeck: How is usage counted?
By delivered events, so a single inbound webhook fanned out to three destinations counts as three.
Tenable: What is the difference between Nessus Professional and Nessus Expert?
Nessus Professional costs $4790/year and provides core vulnerability scanning. Nessus Expert costs $6790/year and offers advanced scanning capabilities.
SourceHookdeck: Can I replay a failed webhook?
Yes, individually or in bulk from the console, with the original payload.
Tenable: Are custom support and training available for Tenable?
Yes. Optional advanced support is available for $400/year. Training courses range from $275-$385/year.
SourceHookdeck: Does it work for outbound webhooks too?
Yes, the same queueing, retry and observability applies to webhooks you send.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Hookdeck vs Jitsu
- Hookdeck vs Spacelift
- Hookdeck vs Garden
- Hookdeck vs Webpack
- Hookdeck vs Backstage
- Hookdeck vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Hookdeck vs Dagger
- Hookdeck vs Okteto
- Hookdeck vs Visual Studio Code
- Hookdeck vs Daytona
- Hookdeck vs Harness
- Hookdeck vs Ansible
- Hookdeck vs Argo CD
- Hookdeck vs Atlantis
- Hookdeck vs Blacksmith
- Hookdeck vs Coder
- Hookdeck vs Netwrix
- Hookdeck vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Hookdeck vs Qualys VMDR
- Hookdeck vs Aikido
- Hookdeck vs Arnica
- Hookdeck vs Doppler
- Hookdeck vs Chainguard
- Hookdeck vs Recorded Future
- Hookdeck vs Speakeasy
- Hookdeck vs Sysdig
- Hookdeck vs Endor Labs
- Hookdeck vs Tanium
- Hookdeck vs Enpass
- Hookdeck vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Hookdeck vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Hookdeck vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Hookdeck vs HID Global
- Hookdeck vs IBM QRadar
- Tenable vs Jitsu
- Tenable vs Spacelift
- Tenable vs Garden
- Tenable vs Webpack
- Tenable vs Backstage
- Tenable vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Tenable vs Dagger
- Tenable vs Okteto
- Tenable vs Visual Studio Code
- Tenable vs Daytona
- Tenable vs Harness
- Tenable vs Ansible
- Tenable vs Argo CD
- Tenable vs Atlantis
- Tenable vs Blacksmith
- Tenable vs Coder
- Tenable vs Netwrix
- Tenable vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Tenable vs Qualys VMDR
- Tenable vs Aikido
- Tenable vs Arnica
- Tenable vs Doppler
- Tenable vs Chainguard
- Tenable vs Recorded Future
- Tenable vs Speakeasy
- Tenable vs Sysdig
- Tenable vs Endor Labs
- Tenable vs Tanium
- Tenable vs Enpass
- Tenable vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Tenable vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Tenable vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Tenable vs HID Global
- Tenable vs IBM QRadar
