Cybersecurity · head to head
Aikido vs Sourcegraph

Aikido
Cybersecurity
Unified security platform automating vulnerability detection and fixing across development
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Sourcegraph
Developer Tools
Code search and intelligence platform for large codebases with Cody AI assistant
- From
- $16000/year
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Aikido has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Aikido free plan includes fair-usage limits on repos and container images; Sourcegraph enterprise pricing starting at $16k annually creates significant barrier for small teams
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Aikido and Sourcegraph actually diverge.
| Attribute | Aikido | Sourcegraph |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $16000/year |
| Pricing model | Subscription with free tier | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, CI/CD, IDE | Cloud, Self-hosted |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
| Founded | 2022 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Aikido
- Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
- Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
- AutoFix
- Secrets detection
- Cloud Security Posture Management
- AI-powered penetration testing
- Device protection
- False positive reduction
Only in Sourcegraph
Nothing recorded that Aikido does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Aikido
- Developer-friendly security integrated into PR workflowsnot Sourcegraph
- Automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alertsnot Sourcegraph
- Consolidation of fragmented security tools across development lifecyclenot Sourcegraph
- Cloud infrastructure security posture monitoringnot Sourcegraph
- Supply chain attack prevention and malware detectionnot Sourcegraph
Sourcegraph
- Large-scale code migrations across hundreds of repositoriesnot Aikido
- Enterprise governance and code ownership trackingnot Aikido
- AI-assisted bug hunting and security pattern detectionnot Aikido
- Onboarding engineers into large unfamiliar codebasesnot Aikido
- Regulatory compliance and code audit trailsnot Aikido
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Aikido
- Free plan includes fair-usage limits on repos and container images
- Pricing increases significantly with user and repository scale
- Advanced features like penetration testing and VM scanning limited to higher tiers
- Device protection limited to Development environments only
- Requires multiple plan tiers for full platform coverage
Sourcegraph
- Enterprise pricing starting at $16k annually creates significant barrier for small teams
- No free tier or standard plan published; all options require custom sales engagement
- Complex enterprise-only positioning limits adoption compared to GitHub Copilot's pervasiveness
- Requires indexing entire codebase; not suitable for small or ephemeral projects
Pricing, plan by plan
Aikido
Free- DeveloperFree
- Up to 2 users
- Dependency scanning (SCA)
- SAST and AI SAST
- Pro$600/month
- Up to 10 users
- All Basic features
- On-premise scanning
- Advanced$600/month
- Up to 10 users
- All Pro features
- Broker for internal apps
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Custom pricing for tailored modules
- Dedicated account management
- Custom SLAs
Sourcegraph
$16000/year- Enterprise$16000/year
- Scales with team size
- Credits for AI features per user
- Deep Search
Which should you pick?
Choose Aikido if
- You need static application security testing (sast).
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CI/CD, IDE.
- You also want software composition analysis (sca).
Questions people ask
- Is Aikido or Sourcegraph better?
- Neither clearly leads. Aikido starts at Free and Sourcegraph at $16000/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Aikido or Sourcegraph?
- Aikido has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Aikido and $16000/year for Sourcegraph.
- Does Aikido or Sourcegraph run on more platforms?
- Aikido runs on Web, CI/CD, IDE. Sourcegraph runs on Cloud, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Aikido for free?
- Yes. Aikido has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Sourcegraph starts at $16000/year.
- What is Aikido best used for?
- Aikido is most often used for developer-friendly security integrated into pr workflows, automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alerts, consolidation of fragmented security tools across development lifecycle, cloud infrastructure security posture monitoring. Of those, developer-friendly security integrated into pr workflows and automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alerts are not what Sourcegraph is typically brought in for.
- What can Aikido do that Sourcegraph cannot?
- Aikido covers Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Software Composition Analysis (SCA), AutoFix, Secrets detection.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Aikido: What is included in Aikido's free Developer plan?
The free Developer plan includes up to 2 users with SAST, SCA, secrets detection, cloud scanning, and license risk detection. Fair-usage limits apply: 10 repos, 2 container images, 1 domain, and 1 cloud account.
SourceAikido: What is AutoFix and how does it work?
AutoFix is Aikido's automated vulnerability remediation feature that identifies vulnerabilities and suggests or applies specific code fixes automatically, reducing manual remediation effort.
SourceAikido: How many false positives does Aikido reduce?
Aikido reduces false positives by 99%, using AI-powered context awareness to filter noise and focus on vulnerabilities that present real business risk.
SourceAikido: What integrations does Aikido support?
Aikido integrates with Jira, Linear, Slack, Teams, GitHub, GitLab, and other popular development tools to fit into existing workflows.
SourceRelated pages
More on Sourcegraph
Other head to heads
- Aikido vs Snyk
- Aikido vs Veracode
- Aikido vs Tenable
- Aikido vs Legit Security
- Aikido vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Aikido vs Qualys VMDR
- Aikido vs Arnica
- Aikido vs Sysdig
- Aikido vs Akeyless
- Aikido vs Infisical
- Aikido vs Tanium
- Aikido vs Doppler
- Aikido vs Passbolt
- Aikido vs Ping Identity
- Aikido vs Proofpoint
- Aikido vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Aikido vs Recorded Future
- Aikido vs Visual Studio Code
- Aikido vs ESLint
- Aikido vs pnpm
- Aikido vs Turborepo
- Aikido vs Cody
- Aikido vs Sweep
- Aikido vs Bazel
- Aikido vs GitHub Copilot
- Aikido vs Moonrepo
- Aikido vs Nixpacks
- Aikido vs Pieces for Developers
- Aikido vs Rust
- Aikido vs Fig
- Aikido vs Frappe
- Aikido vs Git
- Aikido vs GoLand
- Aikido vs Hookdeck
- Aikido vs JFrog Artifactory
- Sourcegraph vs Snyk
- Sourcegraph vs Veracode
- Sourcegraph vs Tenable
- Sourcegraph vs Legit Security
- Sourcegraph vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Sourcegraph vs Qualys VMDR
- Sourcegraph vs Arnica
- Sourcegraph vs Sysdig
- Sourcegraph vs Akeyless
- Sourcegraph vs Infisical
- Sourcegraph vs Tanium
- Sourcegraph vs Doppler
- Sourcegraph vs Passbolt
- Sourcegraph vs Ping Identity
- Sourcegraph vs Proofpoint
- Sourcegraph vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Sourcegraph vs Recorded Future
- Sourcegraph vs Visual Studio Code
- Sourcegraph vs ESLint
- Sourcegraph vs pnpm
- Sourcegraph vs Turborepo
- Sourcegraph vs Cody
- Sourcegraph vs Sweep
- Sourcegraph vs Bazel
- Sourcegraph vs GitHub Copilot
- Sourcegraph vs Moonrepo
- Sourcegraph vs Nixpacks
- Sourcegraph vs Pieces for Developers
- Sourcegraph vs Rust
- Sourcegraph vs Fig
- Sourcegraph vs Frappe
- Sourcegraph vs Git
- Sourcegraph vs GoLand
- Sourcegraph vs Hookdeck
- Sourcegraph vs JFrog Artifactory
