Cybersecurity · head to head
Arnica vs Sourcegraph

Arnica
Cybersecurity
AI-native application security platform detecting and fixing vulnerabilities across the SDLC
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Sourcegraph
Developer Tools
Code search and intelligence platform for large codebases with Cody AI assistant
- From
- $16000/year
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Arnica has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Arnica per-identity pricing ($25-$50/person/year) requires tracking active developers; Sourcegraph enterprise pricing starting at $16k annually creates significant barrier for small teams
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Arnica and Sourcegraph actually diverge.
| Attribute | Arnica | Sourcegraph |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $16000/year |
| Pricing model | Per-identity subscription with annual discount | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, GitHub, IDE | Cloud, Self-hosted |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Arnica
- AI SAST
- Software Composition Analysis
- Secrets detection
- IaC scanning
- Container scanning
- SBOM generation
- Agentic rules
- Pipelineless integration
Only in Sourcegraph
Nothing recorded that Arnica does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Arnica
- Detecting AI-generated vulnerabilities in Copilot and Cursor suggestionsnot Sourcegraph
- Finding hardcoded secrets before they reach productionnot Sourcegraph
- Mapping container vulnerabilities back to source codenot Sourcegraph
- Generating SBOM for supply chain compliance requirementsnot Sourcegraph
- Scanning infrastructure-as-code for misconfiguration risksnot Sourcegraph
Sourcegraph
- Large-scale code migrations across hundreds of repositoriesnot Arnica
- Enterprise governance and code ownership trackingnot Arnica
- AI-assisted bug hunting and security pattern detectionnot Arnica
- Onboarding engineers into large unfamiliar codebasesnot Arnica
- Regulatory compliance and code audit trailsnot Arnica
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Arnica
- Per-identity pricing ($25-$50/person/year) requires tracking active developers
- Overage identity tracking via 90-day PR activity can be unpredictable
- Free plan limited to weekly updates, requiring upgrade for real-time scanning
- Advanced add-ons (Image Scanning, AI SAST, Agentic Rules Enforcer) pricing not published
- On-premises deployment limited to Enterprise tier
Sourcegraph
- Enterprise pricing starting at $16k annually creates significant barrier for small teams
- No free tier or standard plan published; all options require custom sales engagement
- Complex enterprise-only positioning limits adoption compared to GitHub Copilot's pervasiveness
- Requires indexing entire codebase; not suitable for small or ephemeral projects
Pricing, plan by plan
Arnica
Free- FreeFree
- No credit card required
- 14-day trial available
- Weekly risk identification updates
- Core Business$360/year
- Monthly billing option at $30/identity/month
- Annual billing at $25/identity/month (17% discount)
- Real-time risk scanning and notifications
- Core Enterprise$720/year
- Monthly billing option at $60/identity/month
- Annual billing at $50/identity/month (17% discount)
- All Core Business features
Sourcegraph
$16000/year- Enterprise$16000/year
- Scales with team size
- Credits for AI features per user
- Deep Search
Which should you pick?
Choose Arnica if
- You need ai sast.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, GitHub, IDE.
- You also want software composition analysis.
Questions people ask
- Is Arnica or Sourcegraph better?
- Neither clearly leads. Arnica starts at Free and Sourcegraph at $16000/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Arnica or Sourcegraph?
- Arnica has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Arnica and $16000/year for Sourcegraph.
- Does Arnica or Sourcegraph run on more platforms?
- Arnica runs on Web, GitHub, IDE. Sourcegraph runs on Cloud, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Arnica for free?
- Yes. Arnica has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Sourcegraph starts at $16000/year.
- What is Arnica best used for?
- Arnica is most often used for detecting ai-generated vulnerabilities in copilot and cursor suggestions, finding hardcoded secrets before they reach production, mapping container vulnerabilities back to source code, generating sbom for supply chain compliance requirements. Of those, detecting ai-generated vulnerabilities in copilot and cursor suggestions and finding hardcoded secrets before they reach production are not what Sourcegraph is typically brought in for.
- What can Arnica do that Sourcegraph cannot?
- Arnica covers AI SAST, Software Composition Analysis, Secrets detection, IaC scanning.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Arnica: How are identities defined in Arnica pricing?
Identities are any users and other contributing entities that contributed code and/or had PR activity during the last 90 days. This ensures billing matches active developers.
SourceArnica: What is the annual discount?
Annual prepayment offers approximately 17% savings versus monthly billing. Core Business annual is $300/identity versus $360 for monthly.
SourceArnica: Can I cancel or downgrade Arnica anytime?
Yes. Subscriptions can be cancelled or downgraded at any time. Overage identities receive automatic protection with true-up invoicing.
SourceRelated pages
More on Sourcegraph
Other head to heads
- Arnica vs Semgrep
- Arnica vs Snyk
- Arnica vs Chainguard
- Arnica vs Tenable
- Arnica vs Doppler
- Arnica vs Aikido
- Arnica vs Endor Labs
- Arnica vs Trivy
- Arnica vs Socket
- Arnica vs Infisical
- Arnica vs Bitwarden
- Arnica vs RoboForm
- Arnica vs Sardine
- Arnica vs Semperis
- Arnica vs SentinelOne
- Arnica vs Shufti Pro
- Arnica vs Nessus
- Arnica vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Arnica vs Visual Studio Code
- Arnica vs ESLint
- Arnica vs pnpm
- Arnica vs Turborepo
- Arnica vs Cody
- Arnica vs Sweep
- Arnica vs Bazel
- Arnica vs GitHub Copilot
- Arnica vs Moonrepo
- Arnica vs Nixpacks
- Arnica vs Pieces for Developers
- Arnica vs Rust
- Arnica vs Fig
- Arnica vs Frappe
- Arnica vs Git
- Arnica vs GoLand
- Arnica vs Hookdeck
- Arnica vs JFrog Artifactory
- Sourcegraph vs Semgrep
- Sourcegraph vs Snyk
- Sourcegraph vs Chainguard
- Sourcegraph vs Tenable
- Sourcegraph vs Doppler
- Sourcegraph vs Aikido
- Sourcegraph vs Endor Labs
- Sourcegraph vs Trivy
- Sourcegraph vs Socket
- Sourcegraph vs Infisical
- Sourcegraph vs Bitwarden
- Sourcegraph vs RoboForm
- Sourcegraph vs Sardine
- Sourcegraph vs Semperis
- Sourcegraph vs SentinelOne
- Sourcegraph vs Shufti Pro
- Sourcegraph vs Nessus
- Sourcegraph vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Sourcegraph vs Visual Studio Code
- Sourcegraph vs ESLint
- Sourcegraph vs pnpm
- Sourcegraph vs Turborepo
- Sourcegraph vs Cody
- Sourcegraph vs Sweep
- Sourcegraph vs Bazel
- Sourcegraph vs GitHub Copilot
- Sourcegraph vs Moonrepo
- Sourcegraph vs Nixpacks
- Sourcegraph vs Pieces for Developers
- Sourcegraph vs Rust
- Sourcegraph vs Fig
- Sourcegraph vs Frappe
- Sourcegraph vs Git
- Sourcegraph vs GoLand
- Sourcegraph vs Hookdeck
- Sourcegraph vs JFrog Artifactory
