Cybersecurity · head to head
Chainguard vs Sourcegraph

Chainguard
Cybersecurity
Secure-by-default open source software with hardened container images and libraries
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Sourcegraph
Developer Tools
Code search and intelligence platform for large codebases with Cody AI assistant
- From
- $16000/year
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Chainguard has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Chainguard containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people; Sourcegraph enterprise pricing starting at $16k annually creates significant barrier for small teams
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Chainguard and Sourcegraph actually diverge.
| Attribute | Chainguard | Sourcegraph |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $16000/year |
| Pricing model | Licensing by artifact type and team size | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Cloud, Container, VM | Cloud, Self-hosted |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Chainguard
- Hardened container images
- CVE remediation SLA
- SLSA L2/L3 builds
- Sigstore signatures
- SBOM generation
- Language libraries
- VM images
- Artifact scanning
Only in Sourcegraph
Nothing recorded that Chainguard does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Chainguard
- Deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surfacenot Sourcegraph
- Meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industriesnot Sourcegraph
- Reducing CVE exposure with contractual remediation guaranteesnot Sourcegraph
- Building secure language packages with automatic backportsnot Sourcegraph
- Verifying artifact provenance with Sigstore signaturesnot Sourcegraph
Sourcegraph
- Large-scale code migrations across hundreds of repositoriesnot Chainguard
- Enterprise governance and code ownership trackingnot Chainguard
- AI-assisted bug hunting and security pattern detectionnot Chainguard
- Onboarding engineers into large unfamiliar codebasesnot Chainguard
- Regulatory compliance and code audit trailsnot Chainguard
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Chainguard
- Containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people
- Per-image pricing for containers requires custom quotes with no transparency
- Free tier limited to 5 container images for testing
- Libraries pricing by ecosystem and developer count lacks transparent per-developer cost
- VM image catalog pricing opacity makes cost estimation difficult
Sourcegraph
- Enterprise pricing starting at $16k annually creates significant barrier for small teams
- No free tier or standard plan published; all options require custom sales engagement
- Complex enterprise-only positioning limits adoption compared to GitHub Copilot's pervasiveness
- Requires indexing entire codebase; not suitable for small or ephemeral projects
Pricing, plan by plan
Chainguard
Free- Free TierFree
- Five container images to test and deploy
- Containers Per-Image$undefined/custom
- Licensed by quantity and type
- Base images, application images, AI/ML images, FIPS variants
- Custom pricing per image
- Containers Catalog$19000/year
- For 10-person engineering teams
- 2,000+ container images
- Contractual CVE remediation SLAs
- Libraries Licensing$undefined/custom
- Licensed by ecosystem (Python, Java, JavaScript)
- Licensed by developer count
- Unlimited pulls with no metering
Sourcegraph
$16000/year- Enterprise$16000/year
- Scales with team size
- Credits for AI features per user
- Deep Search
Which should you pick?
Choose Chainguard if
- You need hardened container images.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Container, VM.
- You also want cve remediation sla.
Questions people ask
- Is Chainguard or Sourcegraph better?
- Neither clearly leads. Chainguard starts at Free and Sourcegraph at $16000/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Chainguard or Sourcegraph?
- Chainguard has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Chainguard and $16000/year for Sourcegraph.
- Does Chainguard or Sourcegraph run on more platforms?
- Chainguard runs on Cloud, Container, VM. Sourcegraph runs on Cloud, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Chainguard for free?
- Yes. Chainguard has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Sourcegraph starts at $16000/year.
- What is Chainguard best used for?
- Chainguard is most often used for deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface, meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries, reducing cve exposure with contractual remediation guarantees, building secure language packages with automatic backports. Of those, deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface and meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries are not what Sourcegraph is typically brought in for.
- What can Chainguard do that Sourcegraph cannot?
- Chainguard covers Hardened container images, CVE remediation SLA, SLSA L2/L3 builds, Sigstore signatures.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Chainguard: How much is the Chainguard Containers Catalog?
The Containers Catalog is 19,000 USD per year for 10-person engineering teams, providing access to 2,000+ hardened container images.
SourceChainguard: What SLAs does Chainguard offer?
Chainguard provides contractual CVE remediation SLAs: 7 days for critical vulnerabilities, 14 days for high/medium/low severity, all with priority support.
SourceChainguard: Can I try Chainguard before purchasing?
Yes. The free tier includes five container images for testing and deployment, allowing hands-on evaluation.
SourceRelated pages
More on Sourcegraph
Other head to heads
- Chainguard vs Snyk
- Chainguard vs Trivy
- Chainguard vs Doppler
- Chainguard vs Infisical
- Chainguard vs Grype
- Chainguard vs Arnica
- Chainguard vs HashiCorp Vault
- Chainguard vs Bitwarden
- Chainguard vs Semgrep
- Chainguard vs Authelia
- Chainguard vs Endor Labs
- Chainguard vs Tenable
- Chainguard vs Hanwha Vision
- Chainguard vs Idira
- Chainguard vs IVPN
- Chainguard vs Logto
- Chainguard vs Malwarebytes
- Chainguard vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Chainguard vs Visual Studio Code
- Chainguard vs ESLint
- Chainguard vs pnpm
- Chainguard vs Turborepo
- Chainguard vs Cody
- Chainguard vs Sweep
- Chainguard vs Bazel
- Chainguard vs GitHub Copilot
- Chainguard vs Moonrepo
- Chainguard vs Nixpacks
- Chainguard vs Pieces for Developers
- Chainguard vs Rust
- Chainguard vs Fig
- Chainguard vs Frappe
- Chainguard vs Git
- Chainguard vs GoLand
- Chainguard vs Hookdeck
- Chainguard vs JFrog Artifactory
- Sourcegraph vs Snyk
- Sourcegraph vs Trivy
- Sourcegraph vs Doppler
- Sourcegraph vs Infisical
- Sourcegraph vs Grype
- Sourcegraph vs Arnica
- Sourcegraph vs HashiCorp Vault
- Sourcegraph vs Bitwarden
- Sourcegraph vs Semgrep
- Sourcegraph vs Authelia
- Sourcegraph vs Endor Labs
- Sourcegraph vs Tenable
- Sourcegraph vs Hanwha Vision
- Sourcegraph vs Idira
- Sourcegraph vs IVPN
- Sourcegraph vs Logto
- Sourcegraph vs Malwarebytes
- Sourcegraph vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Sourcegraph vs Visual Studio Code
- Sourcegraph vs ESLint
- Sourcegraph vs pnpm
- Sourcegraph vs Turborepo
- Sourcegraph vs Cody
- Sourcegraph vs Sweep
- Sourcegraph vs Bazel
- Sourcegraph vs GitHub Copilot
- Sourcegraph vs Moonrepo
- Sourcegraph vs Nixpacks
- Sourcegraph vs Pieces for Developers
- Sourcegraph vs Rust
- Sourcegraph vs Fig
- Sourcegraph vs Frappe
- Sourcegraph vs Git
- Sourcegraph vs GoLand
- Sourcegraph vs Hookdeck
- Sourcegraph vs JFrog Artifactory
