Software · head to head
Sourcegraph Cody vs Cursor

Sourcegraph Cody
Software
Enterprise AI coding assistant with whole-codebase context
- From
- $59/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Cursor has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Sourcegraph Cody no longer available to individual developers or small teams after free and Pro tiers were discontinued in mid-2025; Cursor cannot work fully offline; AI features require internet connection
- They diverge on capability: Sourcegraph Cody covers Multi-repository context, Cursor covers AI code completion.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Sourcegraph Cody and Cursor actually diverge.
| Attribute | Sourcegraph Cody | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $59/month | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Unknown |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | web, windows, mac, linux | Windows, Macos, Linux |
| Founded | 2013 | 2022 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Sourcegraph Cody
- Multi-repository context
- Large context window
- Context filters
- Model flexibility
- IDE integration
Only in Cursor
- AI code completion
- Natural language editing
- Codebase chat
- Multi-file editing
- Code generation
- Bug fixing assistance
- Refactoring suggestions
- AI pair programming
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Sourcegraph Cody
- Cross-repository code understanding for large engineering orgsnot Cursor
- AI-assisted code review and refactoring at enterprise scalenot Cursor
- Enforcing data-boundary controls when using third-party LLMsnot Cursor
- Codebase-aware chat and autocomplete for developersnot Cursor
Cursor
- AI-assisted codingnot Sourcegraph Cody
- Code generationnot Sourcegraph Cody
- Bug fixingnot Sourcegraph Cody
- Refactoringnot Sourcegraph Cody
- Learning new codebasesnot Sourcegraph Cody
- Rapid prototypingnot Sourcegraph Cody
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Sourcegraph Cody
- No longer available to individual developers or small teams after free and Pro tiers were discontinued in mid-2025
- Priced substantially higher than many competing AI coding assistants, with Enterprise plans typically requiring annual contracts
- Sourcegraph has shifted its individual-developer focus to a separate product, Amp, creating uncertainty about Cody's long-term product priority
- Requires integration with Sourcegraph's broader code intelligence platform rather than working as a lightweight standalone extension
Cursor
- Cannot work fully offline; AI features require internet connection
- Local models require requests to route through Cursor's backend, not true localhost support
- Free tier capped at 2,000 completions per month
- Codebase indexing uploads code chunks to compute embeddings, with file caching handled server-side
Pricing, plan by plan
Sourcegraph Cody
$59/month- Enterprise$59/month
- Whole-codebase AI context
- Context filters for sensitive code
- Multi-repository analysis
Cursor
Free- HobbyFree
- 2,000 completions/month
- 50 slow premium requests
- Basic autocomplete
- Pro$20/month
- Unlimited completions
- 500 fast premium requests
- Composer multi-file editor
- Pro+$60/month
- 3x Pro limits on Agent requests
- Priority feature access
- Teams Standard$40/user/month
- All Individual Pro features
- Centralized billing
- SAML/OIDC SSO
Which should you pick?
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if
- You need multi-repository context.
- You work on web, windows, mac, linux.
- You also want large context window.
Choose Cursor if
- You need ai code completion.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, Macos, Linux.
- You also want natural language editing.
Questions people ask
- Is Sourcegraph Cody or Cursor better?
- Neither clearly leads. Sourcegraph Cody starts at $59/month and Cursor at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Sourcegraph Cody or Cursor?
- Cursor has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $59/month for Sourcegraph Cody and Free for Cursor.
- Does Sourcegraph Cody or Cursor run on more platforms?
- Sourcegraph Cody runs on web, windows, mac, linux. Cursor runs on Windows, Macos, Linux.
- Can I use Cursor for free?
- Yes. Cursor has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Sourcegraph Cody starts at $59/month.
- What is Sourcegraph Cody best used for?
- Sourcegraph Cody is most often used for cross-repository code understanding for large engineering orgs, ai-assisted code review and refactoring at enterprise scale, enforcing data-boundary controls when using third-party llms, codebase-aware chat and autocomplete for developers. Of those, cross-repository code understanding for large engineering orgs and ai-assisted code review and refactoring at enterprise scale are not what Cursor is typically brought in for.
- What can Sourcegraph Cody do that Cursor cannot?
- Sourcegraph Cody covers Multi-repository context, Large context window, Context filters, Model flexibility. Cursor covers AI code completion, Natural language editing, Codebase chat, Multi-file editing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Sourcegraph Cody: Is Sourcegraph Cody still available to individual developers?
No, as of mid-2025 Cody Free and Pro plans were discontinued; Cody is now sold only as part of Sourcegraph's Enterprise plan, which requires an annual contract.
SourceCursor: What's included in Cursor's free tier and what are its limits?
The free Hobby plan provides 2,000 completions per month and 50 slow premium requests, with access to basic autocomplete features. Codebase-wide indexing and the Composer multi-file editor are not available on the free plan.
SourceSourcegraph Cody: How much does Sourcegraph Enterprise cost?
Enterprise plans start around $16,000 and scale with team size and seat count, including bundled AI credits; exact pricing requires a sales quote.
SourceCursor: Does Cursor require an internet connection to edit code?
While Cursor can open and edit files locally, its AI features including autocomplete, chat, agents, and codebase-aware reasoning require internet access to cloud-hosted models.
SourceSourcegraph Cody: How does the AI credit system work on Enterprise plans?
Each plan includes a pooled allocation of AI credits shared across the organization; credits do not expire and roll over at renewal, with volume credit add-ons available.
SourceCursor: Can I use Cursor with local models running on my machine?
Cursor can integrate with local models, but requests still route through Cursor's backend for prompt building. True localhost mode without external endpoints is not supported. The paid plan ($20+/month) is required to use local models.
SourceSourcegraph Cody: What happens if my organization exceeds its credit allocation?
Sourcegraph's pricing page addresses overage and offers additional volume credit buckets for teams that need more than their committed allocation.
SourceCursor: What privacy controls does Cursor offer?
Cursor offers Privacy Mode (enabled on paid Team plans) which prevents customer data from being used for model training, with zero data retention agreements with all AI providers. When disabled, Cursor may use codebase data to improve features.
SourceSourcegraph Cody: Is a free trial available for Sourcegraph Enterprise?
Sourcegraph's pricing page lists free trial availability as one of its published FAQ topics for prospective Enterprise customers.
SourceCursor: What are the differences between Pro and Pro+ plans?
Pro ($20/month) includes unlimited completions and 500 fast premium requests, while Pro+ ($60/month) provides 3x those request limits, priority feature access, and extended Agent capabilities.
SourceCursor: Does Cursor support SSO and on which plan?
SSO with SAML/OIDC is included on Teams Standard ($40/user/month) and higher plans, with full team administration and audit logs.
SourceRelated pages
More on Sourcegraph Cody
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Pika
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Anthropic API
- Sourcegraph Cody vs D-ID
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Fathom
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Stable Diffusion
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Perplexity
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Arize AI
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Black Forest Labs
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Cartesia
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Deepgram
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Helicone
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Ideogram
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Jasper
- Sourcegraph Cody vs PromptLayer
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Resemble AI
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Together AI
- Sourcegraph Cody vs AI21 Labs
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Copy.ai
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Windsurf
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Zed
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Amp
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Codacy
- Sourcegraph Cody vs DeepSource
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Augment Code
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Drizzle ORM
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Flagsmith
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Unleash
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Baseten
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Braintrust
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Bun
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Cline
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Devin
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Factory
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Humanloop
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Langfuse
- Sourcegraph Cody vs LangSmith
- Cursor vs Pika
- Cursor vs Anthropic API
- Cursor vs D-ID
- Cursor vs Fathom
- Cursor vs Stable Diffusion
- Cursor vs Perplexity
- Cursor vs Arize AI
- Cursor vs Black Forest Labs
- Cursor vs Cartesia
- Cursor vs Deepgram
- Cursor vs Helicone
- Cursor vs Ideogram
- Cursor vs Jasper
- Cursor vs PromptLayer
- Cursor vs Resemble AI
- Cursor vs Together AI
- Cursor vs AI21 Labs
- Cursor vs Copy.ai
- Cursor vs Windsurf
- Cursor vs Zed
- Cursor vs Amp
- Cursor vs Codacy
- Cursor vs DeepSource
- Cursor vs Augment Code
- Cursor vs Drizzle ORM
- Cursor vs Flagsmith
- Cursor vs Unleash
- Cursor vs Baseten
- Cursor vs Braintrust
- Cursor vs Bun
- Cursor vs Cline
- Cursor vs Devin
- Cursor vs Factory
- Cursor vs Humanloop
- Cursor vs Langfuse
- Cursor vs LangSmith

