Software · head to head
Bun vs Sourcegraph Cody

Bun
Software
JavaScript runtime, bundler, test runner and package manager unified in single toolchain
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Sourcegraph Cody
Software
Enterprise AI coding assistant with whole-codebase context
- From
- $59/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Bun has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Bun linux requires kernel 5.6 or higher (5.1 minimum but with compatibility issues); older systems not supported; Sourcegraph Cody no longer available to individual developers or small teams after free and Pro tiers were discontinued in mid-2025
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bun and Sourcegraph Cody actually diverge.
| Attribute | Bun | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $59/month |
| Pricing model | open-source | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | macOS, Windows, Linux, FreeBSD, Android | web, windows, mac, linux |
| Founded | Unknown | 2013 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bun
Nothing recorded that Sourcegraph Cody does not also cover.
Only in Sourcegraph Cody
- Multi-repository context
- Large context window
- Context filters
- Model flexibility
- IDE integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bun
- High-performance JavaScript services prioritising startup time and memory efficiencynot Sourcegraph Cody
- Single-file executable deployment without Node runtime dependenciesnot Sourcegraph Cody
- Monorepo management with workspace supportnot Sourcegraph Cody
- Full-stack development with unified toolchainnot Sourcegraph Cody
- Systems programming and shell scripting with JavaScriptnot Sourcegraph Cody
Sourcegraph Cody
- Cross-repository code understanding for large engineering orgsnot Bun
- AI-assisted code review and refactoring at enterprise scalenot Bun
- Enforcing data-boundary controls when using third-party LLMsnot Bun
- Codebase-aware chat and autocomplete for developersnot Bun
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bun
- Linux requires kernel 5.6 or higher (5.1 minimum but with compatibility issues); older systems not supported
- Native Node.js addons not supported directly; requires FFI workarounds for C libraries
- Ecosystem less mature than Node.js; fewer third-party packages optimised for Bun
- Windows support newer and less mature than Linux/macOS; occasional edge cases
Sourcegraph Cody
- No longer available to individual developers or small teams after free and Pro tiers were discontinued in mid-2025
- Priced substantially higher than many competing AI coding assistants, with Enterprise plans typically requiring annual contracts
- Sourcegraph has shifted its individual-developer focus to a separate product, Amp, creating uncertainty about Cody's long-term product priority
- Requires integration with Sourcegraph's broader code intelligence platform rather than working as a lightweight standalone extension
Pricing, plan by plan
Bun
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Bun review.
Sourcegraph Cody
$59/month- Enterprise$59/month
- Whole-codebase AI context
- Context filters for sensitive code
- Multi-repository analysis
Which should you pick?
Choose Bun if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on macOS, Windows, Linux, FreeBSD, Android.
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if
- You need multi-repository context.
- You work on web, windows, mac, linux.
- You also want large context window.
Questions people ask
- Is Bun or Sourcegraph Cody better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bun starts at Free and Sourcegraph Cody at $59/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bun or Sourcegraph Cody?
- Bun has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Bun and $59/month for Sourcegraph Cody.
- Does Bun or Sourcegraph Cody run on more platforms?
- Bun runs on macOS, Windows, Linux, FreeBSD, Android. Sourcegraph Cody runs on web, windows, mac, linux.
- Can I use Bun for free?
- Yes. Bun has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Sourcegraph Cody starts at $59/month.
- What is Bun best used for?
- Bun is most often used for high-performance javascript services prioritising startup time and memory efficiency, single-file executable deployment without node runtime dependencies, monorepo management with workspace support, full-stack development with unified toolchain. Of those, high-performance javascript services prioritising startup time and memory efficiency and single-file executable deployment without node runtime dependencies are not what Sourcegraph Cody is typically brought in for.
- What can Bun do that Sourcegraph Cody cannot?
- Sourcegraph Cody covers Multi-repository context, Large context window, Context filters, Model flexibility.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Sourcegraph Cody: Is Sourcegraph Cody still available to individual developers?
No, as of mid-2025 Cody Free and Pro plans were discontinued; Cody is now sold only as part of Sourcegraph's Enterprise plan, which requires an annual contract.
SourceSourcegraph Cody: How much does Sourcegraph Enterprise cost?
Enterprise plans start around $16,000 and scale with team size and seat count, including bundled AI credits; exact pricing requires a sales quote.
SourceSourcegraph Cody: How does the AI credit system work on Enterprise plans?
Each plan includes a pooled allocation of AI credits shared across the organization; credits do not expire and roll over at renewal, with volume credit add-ons available.
SourceSourcegraph Cody: What happens if my organization exceeds its credit allocation?
Sourcegraph's pricing page addresses overage and offers additional volume credit buckets for teams that need more than their committed allocation.
SourceSourcegraph Cody: Is a free trial available for Sourcegraph Enterprise?
Sourcegraph's pricing page lists free trial availability as one of its published FAQ topics for prospective Enterprise customers.
SourceRelated pages
More on Sourcegraph Cody
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Bun vs Cursor
- Bun vs Windsurf
- Bun vs Zed
- Bun vs Amp
- Bun vs Codacy
- Bun vs DeepSource
- Bun vs Augment Code
- Bun vs Drizzle ORM
- Bun vs Flagsmith
- Bun vs Unleash
- Bun vs Baseten
- Bun vs Braintrust
- Bun vs Cline
- Bun vs Devin
- Bun vs Factory
- Bun vs Humanloop
- Bun vs Langfuse
- Bun vs LangSmith
- Bun vs Pika
- Bun vs Anthropic API
- Bun vs D-ID
- Bun vs Fathom
- Bun vs Stable Diffusion
- Bun vs Perplexity
- Bun vs Arize AI
- Bun vs Black Forest Labs
- Bun vs Cartesia
- Bun vs Deepgram
- Bun vs Helicone
- Bun vs Ideogram
- Bun vs Jasper
- Bun vs PromptLayer
- Bun vs Resemble AI
- Bun vs Together AI
- Bun vs AI21 Labs
- Bun vs Copy.ai
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Cursor
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Windsurf
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Zed
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Amp
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Codacy
- Sourcegraph Cody vs DeepSource
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Augment Code
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Drizzle ORM
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Flagsmith
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Unleash
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Baseten
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Braintrust
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Cline
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Devin
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Factory
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Humanloop
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Langfuse
- Sourcegraph Cody vs LangSmith
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Pika
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Anthropic API
- Sourcegraph Cody vs D-ID
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Fathom
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Stable Diffusion
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Perplexity
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Arize AI
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Black Forest Labs
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Cartesia
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Deepgram
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Helicone
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Ideogram
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Jasper
- Sourcegraph Cody vs PromptLayer
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Resemble AI
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Together AI
- Sourcegraph Cody vs AI21 Labs
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Copy.ai
