Software · head to head
Amazon Q Developer vs Cursor

Amazon Q Developer
Software
Generative AI assistant for coding, testing, and AWS development
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Amazon Q Developer deepest value and AWS-specific expertise is tied to the AWS ecosystem, less compelling for non-AWS shops; Cursor cannot work fully offline; AI features require internet connection
- They diverge on capability: Amazon Q Developer covers Agentic task automation, Cursor covers AI code completion.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Amazon Q Developer and Cursor actually diverge.
| Attribute | Amazon Q Developer | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Unknown |
| Platforms | web, windows, mac, linux, api | Windows, Macos, Linux |
| Founded | Unknown | 2022 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Amazon Q Developer
- Agentic task automation
- Security scanning
- Application transformation
- AWS expertise
- Private code customization
- Admin governance dashboard
- IP indemnity protection
Only in Cursor
- AI code completion
- Natural language editing
- Codebase chat
- Multi-file editing
- Bug fixing assistance
- Refactoring suggestions
- AI pair programming
- Git
Both cover
- Code generation
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Amazon Q Developer
- AI-assisted code completion in an IDEnot Cursor
- Automating Java and .NET application upgradesnot Cursor
- Scanning codebases for security vulnerabilitiesnot Cursor
- Getting AWS architecture guidance while codingnot Cursor
- Automating feature implementation via agentsnot Cursor
Cursor
- AI-assisted codingnot Amazon Q Developer
- Code generationnot Amazon Q Developer
- Bug fixingnot Amazon Q Developer
- Refactoringnot Amazon Q Developer
- Learning new codebasesnot Amazon Q Developer
- Rapid prototypingnot Amazon Q Developer
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Amazon Q Developer
- Deepest value and AWS-specific expertise is tied to the AWS ecosystem, less compelling for non-AWS shops
- Free tier caps agentic requests at 50 per month, which can be exhausted quickly on larger tasks
- Additional transformation usage beyond plan limits is billed per line of code, adding unpredictable costs
- GitHub and Eclipse integrations are still in preview, indicating incomplete platform coverage
Cursor
- Cannot work fully offline; AI features require internet connection
- Local models require requests to route through Cursor's backend, not true localhost support
- Free tier capped at 2,000 completions per month
- Codebase indexing uploads code chunks to compute embeddings, with file caching handled server-side
Pricing, plan by plan
Amazon Q Developer
Free- FreeFree
- 50 agentic requests per month
- Access to latest Claude models
- IDE and CLI use
- Pro$19/month
- Expanded agentic request limits
- 4,000 lines of code per month per user for transformation, pooled at account level
- Admin dashboard with user and policy management
Cursor
Free- HobbyFree
- 2,000 completions/month
- 50 slow premium requests
- Basic autocomplete
- Pro$20/month
- Unlimited completions
- 500 fast premium requests
- Composer multi-file editor
- Pro+$60/month
- 3x Pro limits on Agent requests
- Priority feature access
- Teams Standard$40/user/month
- All Individual Pro features
- Centralized billing
- SAML/OIDC SSO
Which should you pick?
Choose Amazon Q Developer if
- You need agentic task automation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, windows, mac, linux, api.
- You also want security scanning.
Choose Cursor if
- You need ai code completion.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, Macos, Linux.
- You also want natural language editing.
Questions people ask
- Is Amazon Q Developer or Cursor better?
- Neither clearly leads. Amazon Q Developer starts at Free and Cursor at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Amazon Q Developer or Cursor?
- Amazon Q Developer starts at Free and Cursor at Free.
- Does Amazon Q Developer or Cursor run on more platforms?
- Amazon Q Developer runs on web, windows, mac, linux, api. Cursor runs on Windows, Macos, Linux.
- Can I use Amazon Q Developer for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Amazon Q Developer best used for?
- Amazon Q Developer is most often used for ai-assisted code completion in an ide, automating java and .net application upgrades, scanning codebases for security vulnerabilities, getting aws architecture guidance while coding. Of those, ai-assisted code completion in an ide and automating java and .net application upgrades are not what Cursor is typically brought in for.
- What can Amazon Q Developer do that Cursor cannot?
- Amazon Q Developer covers Agentic task automation, Security scanning, Application transformation, AWS expertise. Cursor covers AI code completion, Natural language editing, Codebase chat, Multi-file editing. Both handle Code generation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Amazon Q Developer: What does Amazon Q Developer cost?
There is a free tier with no cost, and a Pro tier priced at $19 per user per month that adds expanded agentic request limits, admin controls, and IP indemnity.
SourceCursor: What's included in Cursor's free tier and what are its limits?
The free Hobby plan provides 2,000 completions per month and 50 slow premium requests, with access to basic autocomplete features. Codebase-wide indexing and the Composer multi-file editor are not available on the free plan.
SourceAmazon Q Developer: What are the limits on the free plan?
The free tier includes 50 agentic requests per month, access to the latest Claude models in IDE and CLI, and 1,000 lines of code per month for Java transformation.
SourceCursor: Does Cursor require an internet connection to edit code?
While Cursor can open and edit files locally, its AI features including autocomplete, chat, agents, and codebase-aware reasoning require internet access to cloud-hosted models.
SourceAmazon Q Developer: How is usage metered beyond plan limits?
Java and .NET transformation usage beyond the plan's included lines of code is billed as overage at $0.003 per line of code submitted.
SourceCursor: Can I use Cursor with local models running on my machine?
Cursor can integrate with local models, but requests still route through Cursor's backend for prompt building. True localhost mode without external endpoints is not supported. The paid plan ($20+/month) is required to use local models.
SourceAmazon Q Developer: Can I cancel my Amazon Q Developer Pro subscription anytime?
Subscriptions are billed monthly per user and prorated in the first month, but canceling before the end of a billing month still incurs the full month's subscription fee.
SourceCursor: What privacy controls does Cursor offer?
Cursor offers Privacy Mode (enabled on paid Team plans) which prevents customer data from being used for model training, with zero data retention agreements with all AI providers. When disabled, Cursor may use codebase data to improve features.
SourceAmazon Q Developer: What counts as an agentic request?
Agentic requests include both question-and-answer chat interactions and autonomous coding tasks performed by Q Developer's agents, all drawn from the same monthly quota.
SourceCursor: What are the differences between Pro and Pro+ plans?
Pro ($20/month) includes unlimited completions and 500 fast premium requests, while Pro+ ($60/month) provides 3x those request limits, priority feature access, and extended Agent capabilities.
SourceCursor: Does Cursor support SSO and on which plan?
SSO with SAML/OIDC is included on Teams Standard ($40/user/month) and higher plans, with full team administration and audit logs.
SourceRelated pages
More on Amazon Q Developer
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Amazon Q Developer vs Pika
- Amazon Q Developer vs Anthropic API
- Amazon Q Developer vs D-ID
- Amazon Q Developer vs Fathom
- Amazon Q Developer vs Stable Diffusion
- Amazon Q Developer vs Perplexity
- Amazon Q Developer vs Arize AI
- Amazon Q Developer vs Black Forest Labs
- Amazon Q Developer vs Cartesia
- Amazon Q Developer vs Deepgram
- Amazon Q Developer vs Helicone
- Amazon Q Developer vs Ideogram
- Amazon Q Developer vs Jasper
- Amazon Q Developer vs PromptLayer
- Amazon Q Developer vs Resemble AI
- Amazon Q Developer vs Together AI
- Amazon Q Developer vs AI21 Labs
- Amazon Q Developer vs Copy.ai
- Amazon Q Developer vs Windsurf
- Amazon Q Developer vs Zed
- Amazon Q Developer vs Amp
- Amazon Q Developer vs Codacy
- Amazon Q Developer vs DeepSource
- Amazon Q Developer vs Augment Code
- Amazon Q Developer vs Drizzle ORM
- Amazon Q Developer vs Flagsmith
- Amazon Q Developer vs Unleash
- Amazon Q Developer vs Baseten
- Amazon Q Developer vs Braintrust
- Amazon Q Developer vs Bun
- Amazon Q Developer vs Cline
- Amazon Q Developer vs Devin
- Amazon Q Developer vs Factory
- Amazon Q Developer vs Humanloop
- Amazon Q Developer vs Langfuse
- Amazon Q Developer vs LangSmith
- Cursor vs Pika
- Cursor vs Anthropic API
- Cursor vs D-ID
- Cursor vs Fathom
- Cursor vs Stable Diffusion
- Cursor vs Perplexity
- Cursor vs Arize AI
- Cursor vs Black Forest Labs
- Cursor vs Cartesia
- Cursor vs Deepgram
- Cursor vs Helicone
- Cursor vs Ideogram
- Cursor vs Jasper
- Cursor vs PromptLayer
- Cursor vs Resemble AI
- Cursor vs Together AI
- Cursor vs AI21 Labs
- Cursor vs Copy.ai
- Cursor vs Windsurf
- Cursor vs Zed
- Cursor vs Amp
- Cursor vs Codacy
- Cursor vs DeepSource
- Cursor vs Augment Code
- Cursor vs Drizzle ORM
- Cursor vs Flagsmith
- Cursor vs Unleash
- Cursor vs Baseten
- Cursor vs Braintrust
- Cursor vs Bun
- Cursor vs Cline
- Cursor vs Devin
- Cursor vs Factory
- Cursor vs Humanloop
- Cursor vs Langfuse
- Cursor vs LangSmith

