AI · head to head
Manus vs Sourcegraph Cody

Manus
AI
General-purpose AI agent executing multi-step tasks in a hosted environment
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Sourcegraph Cody
AI
Enterprise AI coding assistant with whole-codebase context
- From
- $59/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Manus specific pricing and plan tiers not published on accessible pages; users must visit pricing page or contact sales; Sourcegraph Cody no longer available to individual developers or small teams after free and Pro tiers were discontinued in mid-2025
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Manus and Sourcegraph Cody actually diverge.
| Attribute | Manus | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $59/month |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android, Desktop, Slack integration | web, windows, mac, linux |
| Founded | Unknown | 2013 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (AI).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Manus
Nothing recorded that Sourcegraph Cody does not also cover.
Only in Sourcegraph Cody
- Multi-repository context
- Large context window
- Context filters
- Model flexibility
- IDE integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Manus
- Autonomous research and report generationnot Sourcegraph Cody
- Slide deck and presentation creation from requirementsnot Sourcegraph Cody
- Website and graphic design automationnot Sourcegraph Cody
- Game development and interactive content creationnot Sourcegraph Cody
- Multi-step workflow automation via browser operatornot Sourcegraph Cody
Sourcegraph Cody
- Cross-repository code understanding for large engineering orgsnot Manus
- AI-assisted code review and refactoring at enterprise scalenot Manus
- Enforcing data-boundary controls when using third-party LLMsnot Manus
- Codebase-aware chat and autocomplete for developersnot Manus
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Manus
- Specific pricing and plan tiers not published on accessible pages; users must visit pricing page or contact sales
- Organisational transition mid-2026; unclear how this affects feature stability or pricing continuity
- No clear free tier mentioned; access requires subscription from apparent launch
- Limited public documentation on capabilities and limitations
Sourcegraph Cody
- No longer available to individual developers or small teams after free and Pro tiers were discontinued in mid-2025
- Priced substantially higher than many competing AI coding assistants, with Enterprise plans typically requiring annual contracts
- Sourcegraph has shifted its individual-developer focus to a separate product, Amp, creating uncertainty about Cody's long-term product priority
- Requires integration with Sourcegraph's broader code intelligence platform rather than working as a lightweight standalone extension
Pricing, plan by plan
Manus
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Manus review.
Sourcegraph Cody
$59/month- Enterprise$59/month
- Whole-codebase AI context
- Context filters for sensitive code
- Multi-repository analysis
Which should you pick?
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if
- You need multi-repository context.
- You work on web, windows, mac, linux.
- You also want large context window.
Questions people ask
- Is Manus or Sourcegraph Cody better?
- Neither clearly leads. Manus starts at On request and Sourcegraph Cody at $59/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Manus or Sourcegraph Cody?
- Manus starts at On request and Sourcegraph Cody at $59/month.
- Does Manus or Sourcegraph Cody run on more platforms?
- Manus runs on Web, iOS, Android, Desktop, Slack integration. Sourcegraph Cody runs on web, windows, mac, linux.
- What is Manus best used for?
- Manus is most often used for autonomous research and report generation, slide deck and presentation creation from requirements, website and graphic design automation, game development and interactive content creation. Of those, autonomous research and report generation and slide deck and presentation creation from requirements are not what Sourcegraph Cody is typically brought in for.
- What can Manus do that Sourcegraph Cody cannot?
- Sourcegraph Cody covers Multi-repository context, Large context window, Context filters, Model flexibility.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Manus: Where can I find Manus pricing information?
The Manus pricing page at manus.im/pricing mentions 'Manus Pricing Plans' with the tagline 'Less structure, more intelligence,' but specific pricing details and tier information are not published online. Contact Manus directly to discuss pricing options.
SourceSourcegraph Cody: Is Sourcegraph Cody still available to individual developers?
No, as of mid-2025 Cody Free and Pro plans were discontinued; Cody is now sold only as part of Sourcegraph's Enterprise plan, which requires an annual contract.
SourceManus: Does Manus offer a team plan option?
Manus mentions a team plan option on its pricing page, but specific details about team size limits, per-seat costs, and features are not published. Interested customers should contact Manus sales to discuss team pricing.
SourceSourcegraph Cody: How much does Sourcegraph Enterprise cost?
Enterprise plans start around $16,000 and scale with team size and seat count, including bundled AI credits; exact pricing requires a sales quote.
SourceManus: What features are available in Manus?
Manus offers AI design, slides, image generation, music generation, browser operator, and other creative automation features. Specific feature availability by pricing tier requires contacting Manus directly for custom pricing information.
SourceSourcegraph Cody: How does the AI credit system work on Enterprise plans?
Each plan includes a pooled allocation of AI credits shared across the organization; credits do not expire and roll over at renewal, with volume credit add-ons available.
SourceSourcegraph Cody: What happens if my organization exceeds its credit allocation?
Sourcegraph's pricing page addresses overage and offers additional volume credit buckets for teams that need more than their committed allocation.
SourceSourcegraph Cody: Is a free trial available for Sourcegraph Enterprise?
Sourcegraph's pricing page lists free trial availability as one of its published FAQ topics for prospective Enterprise customers.
SourceRelated pages
More on Sourcegraph Cody
Other head to heads
- Manus vs Anthropic API
- Manus vs Fathom
- Manus vs Pika
- Manus vs D-ID
- Manus vs AutoGen
- Manus vs Vellum
- Manus vs C3 AI Suite
- Manus vs DeepSeek
- Manus vs Gumloop
- Manus vs LangGraph
- Manus vs Tabnine
- Manus vs Amazon Q Developer
- Manus vs Jasper
- Manus vs Lindy
- Manus vs PromptLayer
- Manus vs Replicate
- Manus vs Resemble AI
- Manus vs AI21 Labs
- Manus vs Aider
- Manus vs Arize AI
- Manus vs Helicone
- Manus vs CoreWeave
- Manus vs Poolside
- Manus vs Cartesia
- Manus vs ElevenLabs
- Manus vs Grok
- Manus vs Inflection AI
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Anthropic API
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Fathom
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Pika
- Sourcegraph Cody vs D-ID
- Sourcegraph Cody vs AutoGen
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Vellum
- Sourcegraph Cody vs C3 AI Suite
- Sourcegraph Cody vs DeepSeek
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Gumloop
- Sourcegraph Cody vs LangGraph
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Tabnine
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Amazon Q Developer
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Jasper
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Lindy
- Sourcegraph Cody vs PromptLayer
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Replicate
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Resemble AI
- Sourcegraph Cody vs AI21 Labs
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Aider
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Arize AI
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Helicone
- Sourcegraph Cody vs CoreWeave
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Poolside
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Cartesia
- Sourcegraph Cody vs ElevenLabs
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Grok
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Inflection AI
