Software · head to head
Devin vs Sourcegraph Cody

Devin
Software
Autonomous AI software engineer planning and executing code in its own environment
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Sourcegraph Cody
Software
Enterprise AI coding assistant with whole-codebase context
- From
- $59/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Devin pricing not published; specific costs and plan tiers require signup or contact with sales; Sourcegraph Cody no longer available to individual developers or small teams after free and Pro tiers were discontinued in mid-2025
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Devin and Sourcegraph Cody actually diverge.
| Attribute | Devin | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $59/month |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Desktop, Windsurf integration, Web | web, windows, mac, linux |
| Founded | Unknown | 2013 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Devin
Nothing recorded that Sourcegraph Cody does not also cover.
Only in Sourcegraph Cody
- Multi-repository context
- Large context window
- Context filters
- Model flexibility
- IDE integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Devin
- Feature implementation and ticket resolution in established codebasesnot Sourcegraph Cody
- Code migrations and refactoring at scale across repositoriesnot Sourcegraph Cody
- Bug fixing and debugging with test-driven verificationnot Sourcegraph Cody
- Rapid prototyping and proof-of-concept developmentnot Sourcegraph Cody
- Repetitive implementation tasks freeing human engineers for complex designnot Sourcegraph Cody
Sourcegraph Cody
- Cross-repository code understanding for large engineering orgsnot Devin
- AI-assisted code review and refactoring at enterprise scalenot Devin
- Enforcing data-boundary controls when using third-party LLMsnot Devin
- Codebase-aware chat and autocomplete for developersnot Devin
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Devin
- Pricing not published; specific costs and plan tiers require signup or contact with sales
- Cannot handle extremely difficult tasks reliably; success rate decreases with task complexity
- Requires clear, well-scoped task descriptions; ambiguous requirements reduce effectiveness
- Requires human oversight and integration into existing workflows; not fully autonomous
Sourcegraph Cody
- No longer available to individual developers or small teams after free and Pro tiers were discontinued in mid-2025
- Priced substantially higher than many competing AI coding assistants, with Enterprise plans typically requiring annual contracts
- Sourcegraph has shifted its individual-developer focus to a separate product, Amp, creating uncertainty about Cody's long-term product priority
- Requires integration with Sourcegraph's broader code intelligence platform rather than working as a lightweight standalone extension
Pricing, plan by plan
Devin
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Devin review.
Sourcegraph Cody
$59/month- Enterprise$59/month
- Whole-codebase AI context
- Context filters for sensitive code
- Multi-repository analysis
Which should you pick?
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if
- You need multi-repository context.
- You work on web, windows, mac, linux.
- You also want large context window.
Questions people ask
- Is Devin or Sourcegraph Cody better?
- Neither clearly leads. Devin starts at On request and Sourcegraph Cody at $59/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Devin or Sourcegraph Cody?
- Devin starts at On request and Sourcegraph Cody at $59/month.
- Does Devin or Sourcegraph Cody run on more platforms?
- Devin runs on Desktop, Windsurf integration, Web. Sourcegraph Cody runs on web, windows, mac, linux.
- What is Devin best used for?
- Devin is most often used for feature implementation and ticket resolution in established codebases, code migrations and refactoring at scale across repositories, bug fixing and debugging with test-driven verification, rapid prototyping and proof-of-concept development. Of those, feature implementation and ticket resolution in established codebases and code migrations and refactoring at scale across repositories are not what Sourcegraph Cody is typically brought in for.
- What can Devin do that Sourcegraph Cody cannot?
- Sourcegraph Cody covers Multi-repository context, Large context window, Context filters, Model flexibility.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Sourcegraph Cody: Is Sourcegraph Cody still available to individual developers?
No, as of mid-2025 Cody Free and Pro plans were discontinued; Cody is now sold only as part of Sourcegraph's Enterprise plan, which requires an annual contract.
SourceSourcegraph Cody: How much does Sourcegraph Enterprise cost?
Enterprise plans start around $16,000 and scale with team size and seat count, including bundled AI credits; exact pricing requires a sales quote.
SourceSourcegraph Cody: How does the AI credit system work on Enterprise plans?
Each plan includes a pooled allocation of AI credits shared across the organization; credits do not expire and roll over at renewal, with volume credit add-ons available.
SourceSourcegraph Cody: What happens if my organization exceeds its credit allocation?
Sourcegraph's pricing page addresses overage and offers additional volume credit buckets for teams that need more than their committed allocation.
SourceSourcegraph Cody: Is a free trial available for Sourcegraph Enterprise?
Sourcegraph's pricing page lists free trial availability as one of its published FAQ topics for prospective Enterprise customers.
SourceRelated pages
More on Sourcegraph Cody
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Devin vs Cursor
- Devin vs Windsurf
- Devin vs Zed
- Devin vs Amp
- Devin vs Codacy
- Devin vs DeepSource
- Devin vs Augment Code
- Devin vs Drizzle ORM
- Devin vs Flagsmith
- Devin vs Unleash
- Devin vs Baseten
- Devin vs Braintrust
- Devin vs Bun
- Devin vs Cline
- Devin vs Factory
- Devin vs Humanloop
- Devin vs Langfuse
- Devin vs LangSmith
- Devin vs Pika
- Devin vs Anthropic API
- Devin vs D-ID
- Devin vs Fathom
- Devin vs Stable Diffusion
- Devin vs Perplexity
- Devin vs Arize AI
- Devin vs Black Forest Labs
- Devin vs Cartesia
- Devin vs Deepgram
- Devin vs Helicone
- Devin vs Ideogram
- Devin vs Jasper
- Devin vs PromptLayer
- Devin vs Resemble AI
- Devin vs Together AI
- Devin vs AI21 Labs
- Devin vs Copy.ai
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Cursor
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Windsurf
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Zed
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Amp
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Codacy
- Sourcegraph Cody vs DeepSource
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Augment Code
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Drizzle ORM
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Flagsmith
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Unleash
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Baseten
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Braintrust
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Bun
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Cline
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Factory
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Humanloop
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Langfuse
- Sourcegraph Cody vs LangSmith
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Pika
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Anthropic API
- Sourcegraph Cody vs D-ID
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Fathom
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Stable Diffusion
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Perplexity
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Arize AI
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Black Forest Labs
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Cartesia
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Deepgram
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Helicone
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Ideogram
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Jasper
- Sourcegraph Cody vs PromptLayer
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Resemble AI
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Together AI
- Sourcegraph Cody vs AI21 Labs
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Copy.ai
