Softwr

Software · head to head

Devin vs Sourcegraph Cody

Devin logo

Devin

Software

Autonomous AI software engineer planning and executing code in its own environment

From
On request
Rated
-
Sourcegraph Cody logo

Sourcegraph Cody

Software

Enterprise AI coding assistant with whole-codebase context

From
$59/month
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Devin pricing not published; specific costs and plan tiers require signup or contact with sales; Sourcegraph Cody no longer available to individual developers or small teams after free and Pro tiers were discontinued in mid-2025

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Devin and Sourcegraph Cody actually diverge.

Attributes where Devin and Sourcegraph Cody differ
AttributeDevinSourcegraph Cody
Starting priceOn request$59/month
Pricing modelsubscriptionquote
PlatformsDesktop, Windsurf integration, Webweb, windows, mac, linux
FoundedUnknown2013

Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Devin

Nothing recorded that Sourcegraph Cody does not also cover.

Only in Sourcegraph Cody

  • Multi-repository context
  • Large context window
  • Context filters
  • Model flexibility
  • IDE integration

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Devin

  • Feature implementation and ticket resolution in established codebasesnot Sourcegraph Cody
  • Code migrations and refactoring at scale across repositoriesnot Sourcegraph Cody
  • Bug fixing and debugging with test-driven verificationnot Sourcegraph Cody
  • Rapid prototyping and proof-of-concept developmentnot Sourcegraph Cody
  • Repetitive implementation tasks freeing human engineers for complex designnot Sourcegraph Cody

Sourcegraph Cody

  • Cross-repository code understanding for large engineering orgsnot Devin
  • AI-assisted code review and refactoring at enterprise scalenot Devin
  • Enforcing data-boundary controls when using third-party LLMsnot Devin
  • Codebase-aware chat and autocomplete for developersnot Devin

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Devin

  • Pricing not published; specific costs and plan tiers require signup or contact with sales
  • Cannot handle extremely difficult tasks reliably; success rate decreases with task complexity
  • Requires clear, well-scoped task descriptions; ambiguous requirements reduce effectiveness
  • Requires human oversight and integration into existing workflows; not fully autonomous

Sourcegraph Cody

  • No longer available to individual developers or small teams after free and Pro tiers were discontinued in mid-2025
  • Priced substantially higher than many competing AI coding assistants, with Enterprise plans typically requiring annual contracts
  • Sourcegraph has shifted its individual-developer focus to a separate product, Amp, creating uncertainty about Cody's long-term product priority
  • Requires integration with Sourcegraph's broader code intelligence platform rather than working as a lightweight standalone extension

Pricing, plan by plan

Devin

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Devin review.

Sourcegraph Cody

$59/month
  • Enterprise$59/month
    • Whole-codebase AI context
    • Context filters for sensitive code
    • Multi-repository analysis

Which should you pick?

Choose Devin if

  • You work on Desktop, Windsurf integration, Web.

Choose Sourcegraph Cody if

  • You need multi-repository context.
  • You work on web, windows, mac, linux.
  • You also want large context window.

Questions people ask

Is Devin or Sourcegraph Cody better?
Neither clearly leads. Devin starts at On request and Sourcegraph Cody at $59/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Devin or Sourcegraph Cody?
Devin starts at On request and Sourcegraph Cody at $59/month.
Does Devin or Sourcegraph Cody run on more platforms?
Devin runs on Desktop, Windsurf integration, Web. Sourcegraph Cody runs on web, windows, mac, linux.
What is Devin best used for?
Devin is most often used for feature implementation and ticket resolution in established codebases, code migrations and refactoring at scale across repositories, bug fixing and debugging with test-driven verification, rapid prototyping and proof-of-concept development. Of those, feature implementation and ticket resolution in established codebases and code migrations and refactoring at scale across repositories are not what Sourcegraph Cody is typically brought in for.
What can Devin do that Sourcegraph Cody cannot?
Sourcegraph Cody covers Multi-repository context, Large context window, Context filters, Model flexibility.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Sourcegraph Cody: Is Sourcegraph Cody still available to individual developers?

No, as of mid-2025 Cody Free and Pro plans were discontinued; Cody is now sold only as part of Sourcegraph's Enterprise plan, which requires an annual contract.

Source
Sourcegraph Cody: How much does Sourcegraph Enterprise cost?

Enterprise plans start around $16,000 and scale with team size and seat count, including bundled AI credits; exact pricing requires a sales quote.

Source
Sourcegraph Cody: How does the AI credit system work on Enterprise plans?

Each plan includes a pooled allocation of AI credits shared across the organization; credits do not expire and roll over at renewal, with volume credit add-ons available.

Source
Sourcegraph Cody: What happens if my organization exceeds its credit allocation?

Sourcegraph's pricing page addresses overage and offers additional volume credit buckets for teams that need more than their committed allocation.

Source
Sourcegraph Cody: Is a free trial available for Sourcegraph Enterprise?

Sourcegraph's pricing page lists free trial availability as one of its published FAQ topics for prospective Enterprise customers.

Source
Share

Related pages

Other head to heads