Cybersecurity · head to head
Jumio vs Silent Eight

Jumio
Cybersecurity
Document-based identity verification for regulated onboarding
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Silent Eight
Cybersecurity
AI adjudication of sanctions screening and AML alerts
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Jumio no pricing is published at any tier, so a buyer cannot size the cost without entering a sales process, and benchmarking requires a competitive bid from a vendor that does publish.; Silent Eight automated disposition has to clear model risk governance and a regulator, and the shadow running period before auto-close is permitted can consume most of the first year of the contract.
- They diverge on capability: Jumio covers Document verification, Silent Eight covers Alert adjudication.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Jumio and Silent Eight actually diverge.
| Attribute | Jumio | Silent Eight |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, Linux |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Jumio
- Document verification
- Liveness detection
- AML screening
- Identity orchestration
- Risk signals
- Data residency options
- Case review console
Only in Silent Eight
- Alert adjudication
- Narrative generation
- Name screening automation
- Quality assurance
- Shadow mode
- Model transparency reporting
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Jumio
- A bank that needs iBeta certified liveness evidence to satisfy an internal control requirementnot Silent Eight
- A gambling operator required to verify age and identity across multiple regulated European marketsnot Silent Eight
- An organisation with an EU data residency mandate that cannot send biometric data to US processingnot Silent Eight
- A marketplace needing one vendor contract covering document checks, screening and ongoing monitoring rather than threenot Silent Eight
Silent Eight
- A bank whose level one screening team spends most of its time closing obvious false name matchesnot Jumio
- A payments institution with alert volumes growing faster than it can recruit and train analystsnot Jumio
- A compliance function asked by a regulator to demonstrate consistency of alert decisions across offshore teamsnot Jumio
- An institution that has just tightened screening thresholds after an enforcement action and cannot staff the resulting alert increasenot Jumio
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Jumio
- No pricing is published at any tier, so a buyer cannot size the cost without entering a sales process, and benchmarking requires a competitive bid from a vendor that does publish.
- Contracts are structured on annual committed volume, meaning a business whose growth stalls pays for verifications it never consumed and there is usually no rollover.
- AML screening is licensed separately from identity verification, so the quote that wins on document price can be materially more expensive once screening and monitoring are added.
- Pass rates degrade for lower quality documents and older smartphones, and the resulting manual review queue is a staffing cost that does not appear in the vendor quote.
- As an established vendor with a large enterprise base, product changes move at enterprise pace, and buyers wanting rapid iteration on new fraud vectors often find newer entrants ship faster.
Silent Eight
- Automated disposition has to clear model risk governance and a regulator, and the shadow running period before auto-close is permitted can consume most of the first year of the contract.
- It does not improve detection, so an institution with a poorly tuned monitoring system automates the handling of bad alerts rather than fixing why they exist.
- Pricing is tied to alert volume, which means efficiency gains elsewhere that reduce alerts also reduce the vendor bill in a way sales teams structure minimums against.
- The headcount saving is only realised if the institution actually reduces the analyst pool, and many banks redeploy rather than cut, leaving the business case unrealised on paper.
- As a mid-sized private vendor serving tier one banks, concentration risk cuts both ways; the loss of one large client materially affects the company, and buyers should ask about financial stability during diligence.
Pricing, plan by plan
Jumio
On request- Jumio Platform$undefined/year
- Priced per verification with annual volume commitment
- Overage rates apply above committed volume
- AML screening priced separately from document checks
Silent Eight
On request- Iris$undefined/year
- Priced by alert volume adjudicated
- Deploys against existing screening and monitoring systems
- Shadow mode evaluation period
Which should you pick?
Choose Jumio if
- You need document verification.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want liveness detection.
Choose Silent Eight if
- You need alert adjudication.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want narrative generation.
Questions people ask
- Is Jumio or Silent Eight better?
- Neither clearly leads. Jumio starts at On request and Silent Eight at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Jumio or Silent Eight?
- Jumio starts at On request and Silent Eight at On request.
- Does Jumio or Silent Eight run on more platforms?
- Jumio runs on Web, iOS, Android. Silent Eight runs on Web, Linux.
- What is Jumio best used for?
- Jumio is most often used for a bank that needs ibeta certified liveness evidence to satisfy an internal control requirement, a gambling operator required to verify age and identity across multiple regulated european markets, an organisation with an eu data residency mandate that cannot send biometric data to us processing, a marketplace needing one vendor contract covering document checks, screening and ongoing monitoring rather than three. Of those, a bank that needs ibeta certified liveness evidence to satisfy an internal control requirement and a gambling operator required to verify age and identity across multiple regulated european markets are not what Silent Eight is typically brought in for.
- What can Jumio do that Silent Eight cannot?
- Jumio covers Document verification, Liveness detection, AML screening, Identity orchestration. Silent Eight covers Alert adjudication, Narrative generation, Name screening automation, Quality assurance.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Jumio: Does Jumio publish prices?
No. Everything is quoted, normally as a per-verification rate against an annual committed volume with overage pricing above it.
Silent Eight: Does Silent Eight replace our screening system?
No. It consumes alerts from your existing screening and monitoring systems and decides them. The detection layer stays where it is.
Jumio: Is biometric data processed in the EU?
Regional processing including EU data residency is offered. Confirm the specific region and retention period in the contract rather than assuming it.
Silent Eight: Will a regulator accept AI closing alerts?
It depends on your jurisdiction and your model governance evidence. Banks typically run extended shadow mode first and phase auto-closure by alert type.
Jumio: Is AML screening included?
Not by default. Screening and ongoing monitoring are priced separately from document verification.
Silent Eight: Where is the company based?
Singapore, with offices in New York, London and Warsaw.
Related pages
More on Silent Eight
Other head to heads
- Jumio vs Shufti Pro
- Jumio vs Sumsub
- Jumio vs Socure
- Jumio vs Signicat
- Jumio vs iDenfy
- Jumio vs Trulioo
- Jumio vs Fenergo
- Jumio vs Veriff
- Jumio vs IDnow
- Jumio vs Quantexa
- Jumio vs NICE Actimize
- Jumio vs Sardine
- Jumio vs Tuta
- Jumio vs Camio
- Jumio vs Cisco Duo
- Jumio vs Clerk
- Jumio vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Jumio vs ThetaRay
- Jumio vs Feedzai
- Jumio vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Jumio vs Unit21
- Jumio vs NordPass
- Jumio vs One Identity
- Jumio vs Ory Kratos
- Jumio vs OWASP ZAP
- Jumio vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Jumio vs Passbolt
- Silent Eight vs Shufti Pro
- Silent Eight vs Sumsub
- Silent Eight vs Socure
- Silent Eight vs Signicat
- Silent Eight vs iDenfy
- Silent Eight vs Trulioo
- Silent Eight vs Fenergo
- Silent Eight vs Veriff
- Silent Eight vs IDnow
- Silent Eight vs Quantexa
- Silent Eight vs NICE Actimize
- Silent Eight vs Sardine
- Silent Eight vs Tuta
- Silent Eight vs Camio
- Silent Eight vs Cisco Duo
- Silent Eight vs Clerk
- Silent Eight vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Silent Eight vs ThetaRay
- Silent Eight vs Feedzai
- Silent Eight vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Silent Eight vs Unit21
- Silent Eight vs NordPass
- Silent Eight vs One Identity
- Silent Eight vs Ory Kratos
- Silent Eight vs OWASP ZAP
- Silent Eight vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Silent Eight vs Passbolt
