Insurance · head to head
Shift Technology vs Silent Eight

Shift Technology
Insurance
AI-native fraud detection for insurance
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Silent Eight
Cybersecurity
AI adjudication of sanctions screening and AML alerts
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Shift Technology pricing not published on vendor website, requires demo request and quotation; Silent Eight automated disposition has to clear model risk governance and a regulator, and the shadow running period before auto-close is permitted can consume most of the first year of the contract.
- They diverge on capability: Shift Technology covers Fraud detection, Silent Eight covers Alert adjudication.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Shift Technology and Silent Eight actually diverge.
| Attribute | Shift Technology | Silent Eight |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Web, Api | Web, Linux |
| Category | Insurance | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 2014 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Shift Technology
- Fraud detection
- Claims automation
- Document intelligence
- Network analysis
- Real-time scoring
- Investigation workbench
- Predictive analytics
- Machine learning models
Only in Silent Eight
- Alert adjudication
- Narrative generation
- Name screening automation
- Quality assurance
- Shadow mode
- Model transparency reporting
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Shift Technology
- Fraud detectionnot Silent Eight
- Claims automationnot Silent Eight
- SIU operationsnot Silent Eight
- Subrogationnot Silent Eight
- Underwriting risknot Silent Eight
Silent Eight
- A bank whose level one screening team spends most of its time closing obvious false name matchesnot Shift Technology
- A payments institution with alert volumes growing faster than it can recruit and train analystsnot Shift Technology
- A compliance function asked by a regulator to demonstrate consistency of alert decisions across offshore teamsnot Shift Technology
- An institution that has just tightened screening thresholds after an enforcement action and cannot staff the resulting alert increasenot Shift Technology
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Shift Technology
- Pricing not published on vendor website, requires demo request and quotation
- No self-service onboarding; dedicated sales consultation mandatory
- Solution requires on-premises deployment or custom SaaS configuration
Silent Eight
- Automated disposition has to clear model risk governance and a regulator, and the shadow running period before auto-close is permitted can consume most of the first year of the contract.
- It does not improve detection, so an institution with a poorly tuned monitoring system automates the handling of bad alerts rather than fixing why they exist.
- Pricing is tied to alert volume, which means efficiency gains elsewhere that reduce alerts also reduce the vendor bill in a way sales teams structure minimums against.
- The headcount saving is only realised if the institution actually reduces the analyst pool, and many banks redeploy rather than cut, leaving the business case unrealised on paper.
- As a mid-sized private vendor serving tier one banks, concentration risk cuts both ways; the loss of one large client materially affects the company, and buyers should ask about financial stability during diligence.
Pricing, plan by plan
Shift Technology
On request- Fraud Detection$undefined/year
- Claims fraud detection
- Network analysis
- Real-time scoring
- Claims Automation$undefined/year
- Document analysis
- Automated extraction
- Workflow automation
- Enterprise Suite$undefined/year
- All modules
- Custom models
- Global deployment
Silent Eight
On request- Iris$undefined/year
- Priced by alert volume adjudicated
- Deploys against existing screening and monitoring systems
- Shadow mode evaluation period
Which should you pick?
Choose Shift Technology if
- You need fraud detection.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want claims automation.
Choose Silent Eight if
- You need alert adjudication.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want narrative generation.
Questions people ask
- Is Shift Technology or Silent Eight better?
- Neither clearly leads. Shift Technology starts at On request and Silent Eight at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Shift Technology or Silent Eight?
- Shift Technology starts at On request and Silent Eight at On request.
- Does Shift Technology or Silent Eight run on more platforms?
- Shift Technology runs on Web, Api. Silent Eight runs on Web, Linux.
- What is Shift Technology best used for?
- Shift Technology is most often used for fraud detection, claims automation, siu operations, subrogation. Of those, fraud detection and claims automation are not what Silent Eight is typically brought in for.
- What can Shift Technology do that Silent Eight cannot?
- Shift Technology covers Fraud detection, Claims automation, Document intelligence, Network analysis. Silent Eight covers Alert adjudication, Narrative generation, Name screening automation, Quality assurance.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Shift Technology: How much does Shift Technology cost?
Shift Technology does not publish pricing on its website. The vendor requires a demo request and direct sales contact for custom quotations tailored to deployment scope and use cases. Pricing is quote-based and depends on specific implementation needs.
SourceSilent Eight: Does Silent Eight replace our screening system?
No. It consumes alerts from your existing screening and monitoring systems and decides them. The detection layer stays where it is.
Shift Technology: What is Shift Technology's licensing model?
Shift Technology operates on a custom licensing model rather than standardized tiers. Pricing and licensing are determined through consultation with the vendor based on the number of users, data volume, and specific insurance processes being automated.
SourceSilent Eight: Will a regulator accept AI closing alerts?
It depends on your jurisdiction and your model governance evidence. Banks typically run extended shadow mode first and phase auto-closure by alert type.
Silent Eight: Where is the company based?
Singapore, with offices in New York, London and Warsaw.
Related pages
More on Shift Technology
More on Silent Eight
Other head to heads
- Shift Technology vs Guidewire ClaimCenter
- Shift Technology vs Duck Creek Policy
- Shift Technology vs Duck Creek
- Shift Technology vs FRISS
- Shift Technology vs Origami Risk
- Shift Technology vs Tarmika
- Shift Technology vs Insurity Suite
- Shift Technology vs Snapsheet Claims
- Shift Technology vs Majesco Policy for L&A
- Shift Technology vs Applied Epic
- Shift Technology vs Splice Software
- Shift Technology vs TurboRater
- Shift Technology vs Verisk
- Shift Technology vs Vertafore Content
- Shift Technology vs AgencyBloc
- Shift Technology vs Guidewire InsuranceNow
- Shift Technology vs Guidewire PolicyCenter
- Shift Technology vs NICE Actimize
- Shift Technology vs Quantexa
- Shift Technology vs ThetaRay
- Shift Technology vs Feedzai
- Shift Technology vs Jumio
- Shift Technology vs Sumsub
- Shift Technology vs iDenfy
- Shift Technology vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Shift Technology vs Sardine
- Shift Technology vs Camio
- Shift Technology vs Unit21
- Shift Technology vs Shufti Pro
- Shift Technology vs NordPass
- Shift Technology vs One Identity
- Shift Technology vs Ory Kratos
- Shift Technology vs OWASP ZAP
- Shift Technology vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Shift Technology vs Passbolt
- Silent Eight vs Guidewire ClaimCenter
- Silent Eight vs Duck Creek Policy
- Silent Eight vs Duck Creek
- Silent Eight vs FRISS
- Silent Eight vs Origami Risk
- Silent Eight vs Tarmika
- Silent Eight vs Insurity Suite
- Silent Eight vs Snapsheet Claims
- Silent Eight vs Majesco Policy for L&A
- Silent Eight vs Applied Epic
- Silent Eight vs Splice Software
- Silent Eight vs TurboRater
- Silent Eight vs Verisk
- Silent Eight vs Vertafore Content
- Silent Eight vs AgencyBloc
- Silent Eight vs Guidewire InsuranceNow
- Silent Eight vs Guidewire PolicyCenter
- Silent Eight vs NICE Actimize
- Silent Eight vs Quantexa
- Silent Eight vs ThetaRay
- Silent Eight vs Feedzai
- Silent Eight vs Jumio
- Silent Eight vs Sumsub
- Silent Eight vs iDenfy
- Silent Eight vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Silent Eight vs Sardine
- Silent Eight vs Camio
- Silent Eight vs Unit21
- Silent Eight vs Shufti Pro
- Silent Eight vs NordPass
- Silent Eight vs One Identity
- Silent Eight vs Ory Kratos
- Silent Eight vs OWASP ZAP
- Silent Eight vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Silent Eight vs Passbolt
