Software · head to head
Datamine vs RPMGlobal XPAC
D
Datamine
Software
Integrated mining software for resource estimation and planning
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

RPMGlobal XPAC
Software
Production scheduling and planning optimization
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Datamine datamine publishes no price, no licence term and no named cost driver; the planning pages route buyers to a consultation or a sales contact form; RPMGlobal XPAC rPMGlobal publishes no price, no licence model and no purchase route for XPAC; the software pages carry no cost information at all
- They diverge on capability: Datamine covers Resource estimation, RPMGlobal XPAC covers Production scheduling.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Datamine and RPMGlobal XPAC actually diverge.
| Attribute | Datamine | RPMGlobal XPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows | Windows, Web |
| Founded | 1986 | 1995 |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Datamine
- Resource estimation
- Geostatistical analysis
- Geological modeling
- Block modeling
- Grade control
- Surpac
- MineSight
- Leapfrog
Only in RPMGlobal XPAC
- Production scheduling
- Resource allocation
- Constraint optimization
- Multi-scenario planning
- Real-time updates
- MineSched
- Whittle
- ERP systems
Both cover
- Vulcan
- Windows support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Datamine
- Geological modelling and resource estimation for mining projectsnot RPMGlobal XPAC
- Open pit and underground mine design and schedulingnot RPMGlobal XPAC
- Drill and blast design, survey and production reconciliationnot RPMGlobal XPAC
RPMGlobal XPAC
- Midterm and strategic mine production schedulingnot Datamine
- Building life of mine schedules from geological and mine design datanot Datamine
- Comparing scheduling scenarios for open cut and underground operationsnot Datamine
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Datamine
- Datamine publishes no price, no licence term and no named cost driver; the planning pages route buyers to a consultation or a sales contact form
- The portfolio is split into many separate products across strategy, design, scheduling, blasting, survey and production, so a complete workflow requires assembling several licences
- Products acquired from other vendors, including Minemax Scheduler and Minemax Tempo, are now sold inside Datamine bundles rather than standalone
RPMGlobal XPAC
- RPMGlobal publishes no price, no licence model and no purchase route for XPAC; the software pages carry no cost information at all
- XPAC is one of roughly 40 separate RPMGlobal products, so scheduling, simulation and asset management are separate purchases
- Obtaining any pricing requires contacting the vendor through a contact or support form
Pricing, plan by plan
Datamine
On request- Datamine Studio$14000/year
- Resource estimation
- Geostatistics
- Geological modeling
- Datamine Advanced$24000/year
- Advanced optimization
- Strategic planning
- Risk analysis
RPMGlobal XPAC
On request- XPAC Standard$21000/year
- Production scheduling
- Resource optimization
- Constraint management
Which should you pick?
Choose Datamine if
- You need resource estimation.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want geostatistical analysis.
Choose RPMGlobal XPAC if
- You need production scheduling.
- You work on Windows, Web.
- You also want resource allocation.
Questions people ask
- Is Datamine or RPMGlobal XPAC better?
- Neither clearly leads. Datamine starts at On request and RPMGlobal XPAC at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Datamine or RPMGlobal XPAC?
- Datamine starts at On request and RPMGlobal XPAC at On request.
- Does Datamine or RPMGlobal XPAC run on more platforms?
- Datamine runs on Windows. RPMGlobal XPAC runs on Windows, Web.
- What is Datamine best used for?
- Datamine is most often used for geological modelling and resource estimation for mining projects, open pit and underground mine design and scheduling, drill and blast design, survey and production reconciliation. Of those, geological modelling and resource estimation for mining projects and open pit and underground mine design and scheduling are not what RPMGlobal XPAC is typically brought in for.
- What can Datamine do that RPMGlobal XPAC cannot?
- Datamine covers Resource estimation, Geostatistical analysis, Geological modeling, Block modeling. RPMGlobal XPAC covers Production scheduling, Resource allocation, Constraint optimization, Multi-scenario planning. Both handle Vulcan, Windows support.
Related pages
More on RPMGlobal XPAC
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Datamine vs Caterpillar MineStar
- Datamine vs Leapfrog Geo
- Datamine vs Deswik Suite
- Datamine vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- Datamine vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- Datamine vs Micromine
- Datamine vs Datamine Studio RM
- Datamine vs Maptek I-Site
- Datamine vs Minemax
- Datamine vs Promine
- Datamine vs Surpac
- Datamine vs Trimble Mining
- Datamine vs Vulcan
- Datamine vs 3DEC
- Datamine vs acQuire GIM Suite
- Datamine vs Carlson Mining
- Datamine vs Cority EHS
- Datamine vs Enablon EHS
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Caterpillar MineStar
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Leapfrog Geo
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Deswik Suite
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Micromine
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Datamine Studio RM
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Maptek I-Site
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Minemax
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Promine
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Surpac
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Trimble Mining
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Vulcan
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs 3DEC
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs acQuire GIM Suite
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Carlson Mining
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Cority EHS
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Enablon EHS
