Mining & Resources · head to head
Deswik Suite vs UDEC

Deswik Suite
Mining & Resources
Integrated mine planning and design software
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
U
UDEC
Mining & Resources
Universal distinct element code for mining analysis
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Deswik Suite deswik publishes no price, no licence term and no cost driver for the suite; the only routes given are a demo request or contacting the company; UDEC the UDEC product page publishes no price and directs buyers to a quote request or an external software store
- They diverge on capability: Deswik Suite covers 3D mine design, UDEC covers Distinct element modeling.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Deswik Suite and UDEC actually diverge.
| Attribute | Deswik Suite | UDEC |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows | Windows, Linux |
| Founded | 2007 | 1981 |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Mining & Resources).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Deswik Suite
- 3D mine design
- Resource scheduling
- Geological modeling
- Pit optimization
- Underground planning
- Surpac
- Vulcan
- Datamine
Only in UDEC
- Distinct element modeling
- Joint network modeling
- Block interaction analysis
- Support interaction
- Dynamic analysis
- FLAC3D
- 3DEC
- Leapfrog
Both cover
- Windows support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Deswik Suite
- Mine design and scheduling for open pit and underground operationsnot UDEC
- Reserve reporting and life of mine planningnot UDEC
- Connecting mine plans to production execution and material trackingnot UDEC
UDEC
- Two dimensional distinct element modelling of jointed and fractured rocknot Deswik Suite
- Assessing stability of blocky rock slopes and underground excavationsnot Deswik Suite
- Simulating fluid flow through rock fractures in mining and tunnellingnot Deswik Suite
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Deswik Suite
- Deswik publishes no price, no licence term and no cost driver for the suite; the only routes given are a demo request or contacting the company
- The suite is sold as separate modules grouped under Design and Reserving, Planning, Operations and Mine to Market, so a full workflow requires buying several products
- Software downloads and support are gated behind a client portal available to existing customers
- The product formerly sold as Deswik.CAD is now named Deswik Spatial, so older documentation and job listings refer to a name the vendor no longer uses
UDEC
- The UDEC product page publishes no price and directs buyers to a quote request or an external software store
- Fluid Flow, Barton-Bandis joint analysis, Creep, Thermal and User Defined Models are optional add ons charged on top of the base licence
- Writing custom constitutive models requires the separately licensed UDM option and C++ programming
- Purchases through the Buy Now route are prepaid annual subscriptions rather than a permanent licence
Pricing, plan by plan
Deswik Suite
On request- Deswik.CAD$5000/year
- 3D mine design
- Geological modeling
- Drill hole analysis
- Deswik.Sched$8000/year
- Mine scheduling
- Resource optimization
- Gantt charts
- Enterprise Suite$25000/year
- Complete platform access
- All modules included
- Priority support
UDEC
On request- UDEC Professional$19000/year
- Distinct element analysis
- Joint modeling
- Block interaction
Which should you pick?
Choose Deswik Suite if
- You need 3d mine design.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want resource scheduling.
Choose UDEC if
- You need distinct element modeling.
- You work on Windows, Linux.
- You also want joint network modeling.
Questions people ask
- Is Deswik Suite or UDEC better?
- Neither clearly leads. Deswik Suite starts at On request and UDEC at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Deswik Suite or UDEC?
- Deswik Suite starts at On request and UDEC at On request.
- Does Deswik Suite or UDEC run on more platforms?
- Deswik Suite runs on Windows. UDEC runs on Windows, Linux.
- What is Deswik Suite best used for?
- Deswik Suite is most often used for mine design and scheduling for open pit and underground operations, reserve reporting and life of mine planning, connecting mine plans to production execution and material tracking. Of those, mine design and scheduling for open pit and underground operations and reserve reporting and life of mine planning are not what UDEC is typically brought in for.
- What can Deswik Suite do that UDEC cannot?
- Deswik Suite covers 3D mine design, Resource scheduling, Geological modeling, Pit optimization. UDEC covers Distinct element modeling, Joint network modeling, Block interaction analysis, Support interaction. Both handle Windows support.
Related pages
More on Deswik Suite
Other head to heads
- Deswik Suite vs Caterpillar MineStar
- Deswik Suite vs Leapfrog Geo
- Deswik Suite vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- Deswik Suite vs Datamine
- Deswik Suite vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- Deswik Suite vs Micromine
- Deswik Suite vs Datamine Studio RM
- Deswik Suite vs Maptek I-Site
- Deswik Suite vs Minemax
- Deswik Suite vs Promine
- Deswik Suite vs Surpac
- Deswik Suite vs Trimble Mining
- Deswik Suite vs Vulcan
- Deswik Suite vs 3DEC
- Deswik Suite vs acQuire GIM Suite
- Deswik Suite vs Carlson Mining
- Deswik Suite vs Cority EHS
- Deswik Suite vs Enablon EHS
- UDEC vs Caterpillar MineStar
- UDEC vs Leapfrog Geo
- UDEC vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- UDEC vs Datamine
- UDEC vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- UDEC vs Micromine
- UDEC vs Datamine Studio RM
- UDEC vs Maptek I-Site
- UDEC vs Minemax
- UDEC vs Promine
- UDEC vs Surpac
- UDEC vs Trimble Mining
- UDEC vs Vulcan
- UDEC vs 3DEC
- UDEC vs acQuire GIM Suite
- UDEC vs Carlson Mining
- UDEC vs Cority EHS
- UDEC vs Enablon EHS
