Softwr

Mining & Resources · head to head

RPMGlobal XPAC vs GEOVIA GEMS

RPMGlobal XPAC logo

RPMGlobal XPAC

Mining & Resources

Production scheduling and planning optimization

From
On request
Rated
-
GEOVIA GEMS logo

GEOVIA GEMS

Mining & Resources

Comprehensive geology and mine planning solution

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: RPMGlobal XPAC rPMGlobal publishes no price, no licence model and no purchase route for XPAC; the software pages carry no cost information at all; GEOVIA GEMS the GEOVIA portfolio page on 3ds.com lists Surpac, MineSched, Whittle and Services but does not name GEMS or any of its editions, and no page found for GEMS itself publishes a figure or a named tier
  • They diverge on capability: RPMGlobal XPAC covers Production scheduling, GEOVIA GEMS covers Geological modeling.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which RPMGlobal XPAC and GEOVIA GEMS actually diverge.

Attributes where RPMGlobal XPAC and GEOVIA GEMS differ
AttributeRPMGlobal XPACGEOVIA GEMS
PlatformsWindows, WebWindows
Founded19951981

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Mining & Resources).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in RPMGlobal XPAC

  • Production scheduling
  • Resource allocation
  • Constraint optimization
  • Multi-scenario planning
  • Real-time updates
  • Vulcan
  • ERP systems
  • Web support

Only in GEOVIA GEMS

  • Geological modeling
  • Multi-element analysis
  • Resource estimation
  • Mine planning
  • Reserve reporting
  • Surpac
  • 3DEXPERIENCE
  • SAP

Both cover

  • MineSched
  • Whittle
  • Windows support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

RPMGlobal XPAC

  • Midterm and strategic mine production schedulingnot GEOVIA GEMS
  • Building life of mine schedules from geological and mine design datanot GEOVIA GEMS
  • Comparing scheduling scenarios for open cut and underground operationsnot GEOVIA GEMS

GEOVIA GEMS

  • Complex deposit modelingnot RPMGlobal XPAC
  • Multi-element estimationnot RPMGlobal XPAC
  • Strategic planningnot RPMGlobal XPAC
  • Reserve calculationsnot RPMGlobal XPAC
  • Compliance reportingnot RPMGlobal XPAC

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

RPMGlobal XPAC

  • RPMGlobal publishes no price, no licence model and no purchase route for XPAC; the software pages carry no cost information at all
  • XPAC is one of roughly 40 separate RPMGlobal products, so scheduling, simulation and asset management are separate purchases
  • Obtaining any pricing requires contacting the vendor through a contact or support form

GEOVIA GEMS

  • The GEOVIA portfolio page on 3ds.com lists Surpac, MineSched, Whittle and Services but does not name GEMS or any of its editions, and no page found for GEMS itself publishes a figure or a named tier

Pricing, plan by plan

RPMGlobal XPAC

On request
  • XPAC Standard$21000/year
    • Production scheduling
    • Resource optimization
    • Constraint management

GEOVIA GEMS

On request
  • GEMS Core$10000/year
    • Geological modeling
    • Data management
    • 3D visualization
  • GEMS Professional$18000/year
    • Advanced geostatistics
    • Mine design
    • Multi-element modeling

Which should you pick?

Choose RPMGlobal XPAC if

  • You need production scheduling.
  • You work on Windows, Web.
  • You also want resource allocation.

Choose GEOVIA GEMS if

  • You need geological modeling.
  • You work on Windows.
  • You also want multi-element analysis.

Questions people ask

Is RPMGlobal XPAC or GEOVIA GEMS better?
Neither clearly leads. RPMGlobal XPAC starts at On request and GEOVIA GEMS at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, RPMGlobal XPAC or GEOVIA GEMS?
RPMGlobal XPAC starts at On request and GEOVIA GEMS at On request.
Does RPMGlobal XPAC or GEOVIA GEMS run on more platforms?
RPMGlobal XPAC runs on Windows, Web. GEOVIA GEMS runs on Windows.
What is RPMGlobal XPAC best used for?
RPMGlobal XPAC is most often used for midterm and strategic mine production scheduling, building life of mine schedules from geological and mine design data, comparing scheduling scenarios for open cut and underground operations. Of those, midterm and strategic mine production scheduling and building life of mine schedules from geological and mine design data are not what GEOVIA GEMS is typically brought in for.
What can RPMGlobal XPAC do that GEOVIA GEMS cannot?
RPMGlobal XPAC covers Production scheduling, Resource allocation, Constraint optimization, Multi-scenario planning. GEOVIA GEMS covers Geological modeling, Multi-element analysis, Resource estimation, Mine planning. Both handle MineSched, Whittle, Windows support.

Related pages