Software · head to head
acQuire GIM Suite vs RPMGlobal XPAC

acQuire GIM Suite
Software
Geoscientific information management platform
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

RPMGlobal XPAC
Software
Production scheduling and planning optimization
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: acQuire GIM Suite pricing is not published; RPMGlobal XPAC rPMGlobal publishes no price, no licence model and no purchase route for XPAC; the software pages carry no cost information at all
- They diverge on capability: acQuire GIM Suite covers Drill hole data management, RPMGlobal XPAC covers Production scheduling.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which acQuire GIM Suite and RPMGlobal XPAC actually diverge.
| Attribute | acQuire GIM Suite | RPMGlobal XPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1996 | 1995 |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), platforms (Windows, Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in acQuire GIM Suite
- Drill hole data management
- Sample tracking
- QAQC management
- Data validation
- Reporting tools
- Leapfrog
- Surpac
- Micromine
Only in RPMGlobal XPAC
- Production scheduling
- Resource allocation
- Constraint optimization
- Multi-scenario planning
- Real-time updates
- MineSched
- Whittle
- ERP systems
Both cover
- Vulcan
- Windows support
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
acQuire GIM Suite
- Capturing and validating drillhole and geological datanot RPMGlobal XPAC
- Maintaining a single source of truth for geoscientific recordsnot RPMGlobal XPAC
- Field data capture on mobile with offline workingnot RPMGlobal XPAC
- Delivering geological data to modelling and reporting toolsnot RPMGlobal XPAC
RPMGlobal XPAC
- Midterm and strategic mine production schedulingnot acQuire GIM Suite
- Building life of mine schedules from geological and mine design datanot acQuire GIM Suite
- Comparing scheduling scenarios for open cut and underground operationsnot acQuire GIM Suite
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
acQuire GIM Suite
- Pricing is not published
- Built specifically for mining geology rather than general data management
RPMGlobal XPAC
- RPMGlobal publishes no price, no licence model and no purchase route for XPAC; the software pages carry no cost information at all
- XPAC is one of roughly 40 separate RPMGlobal products, so scheduling, simulation and asset management are separate purchases
- Obtaining any pricing requires contacting the vendor through a contact or support form
Pricing, plan by plan
acQuire GIM Suite
On request- GIM Suite Standard$8000/year
- Data management
- QAQC tools
- Validation rules
- GIM Suite Enterprise$18000/year
- Multi-site deployment
- Advanced workflows
- Integration APIs
RPMGlobal XPAC
On request- XPAC Standard$21000/year
- Production scheduling
- Resource optimization
- Constraint management
Which should you pick?
Choose acQuire GIM Suite if
- You need drill hole data management.
- You work on Windows, Web.
- You also want sample tracking.
Choose RPMGlobal XPAC if
- You need production scheduling.
- You work on Windows, Web.
- You also want resource allocation.
Questions people ask
- Is acQuire GIM Suite or RPMGlobal XPAC better?
- Neither clearly leads. acQuire GIM Suite starts at On request and RPMGlobal XPAC at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, acQuire GIM Suite or RPMGlobal XPAC?
- acQuire GIM Suite starts at On request and RPMGlobal XPAC at On request.
- Does acQuire GIM Suite or RPMGlobal XPAC run on more platforms?
- Both run on Windows, Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is acQuire GIM Suite best used for?
- acQuire GIM Suite is most often used for capturing and validating drillhole and geological data, maintaining a single source of truth for geoscientific records, field data capture on mobile with offline working, delivering geological data to modelling and reporting tools. Of those, capturing and validating drillhole and geological data and maintaining a single source of truth for geoscientific records are not what RPMGlobal XPAC is typically brought in for.
- What can acQuire GIM Suite do that RPMGlobal XPAC cannot?
- acQuire GIM Suite covers Drill hole data management, Sample tracking, QAQC management, Data validation. RPMGlobal XPAC covers Production scheduling, Resource allocation, Constraint optimization, Multi-scenario planning. Both handle Vulcan, Windows support, Web support.
Related pages
More on acQuire GIM Suite
More on RPMGlobal XPAC
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- acQuire GIM Suite vs Caterpillar MineStar
- acQuire GIM Suite vs Leapfrog Geo
- acQuire GIM Suite vs Deswik Suite
- acQuire GIM Suite vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- acQuire GIM Suite vs Datamine
- acQuire GIM Suite vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- acQuire GIM Suite vs Micromine
- acQuire GIM Suite vs Datamine Studio RM
- acQuire GIM Suite vs Maptek I-Site
- acQuire GIM Suite vs Minemax
- acQuire GIM Suite vs Promine
- acQuire GIM Suite vs Surpac
- acQuire GIM Suite vs Trimble Mining
- acQuire GIM Suite vs Vulcan
- acQuire GIM Suite vs 3DEC
- acQuire GIM Suite vs Carlson Mining
- acQuire GIM Suite vs Cority EHS
- acQuire GIM Suite vs Enablon EHS
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Caterpillar MineStar
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Leapfrog Geo
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Deswik Suite
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Datamine
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Micromine
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Datamine Studio RM
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Maptek I-Site
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Minemax
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Promine
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Surpac
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Trimble Mining
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Vulcan
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs 3DEC
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Carlson Mining
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Cority EHS
- RPMGlobal XPAC vs Enablon EHS
