Softwr

Marketing · head to head

Bloomreach vs Roxhill

Bloomreach logo

Bloomreach

Marketing

Ecommerce search, merchandising and customer engagement sold as three separately bought products

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Roxhill logo

Roxhill

Marketing

UK-focused journalist database and media monitoring, founder-owned and annual only

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Bloomreach the three products have separate origins, separate pricing units and separate onboarding, so a single bundled quote hides which parts you are actually committing to.; Roxhill the database is UK-centric by reviewers’ own account, with weak US, Australian and broader Asian journalist coverage, so any multi-market programme needs a second vendor and the single-vendor cost case disappears.
  • They diverge on capability: Bloomreach covers Engagement CDP, Roxhill covers Journalist database.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Bloomreach and Roxhill actually diverge.

Attributes where Bloomreach and Roxhill differ
AttributeBloomreachRoxhill
PlatformsWeb, iOS, Android, REST APIWeb, iOS, Android

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Marketing).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Bloomreach

  • Engagement CDP
  • Campaign orchestration
  • Discovery search
  • Recommendations
  • Jinja templating
  • Reports and dashboards

Only in Roxhill

  • Journalist database
  • Journalist profiles
  • Media lists and distribution
  • Media requests and alerts
  • Media monitoring
  • Bespoke newsletters
  • Historical search
  • Journalist Assistant

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Bloomreach

  • A retailer replacing a legacy ESP that needs event-level segmentation rather than list-based sendingnot Roxhill
  • Merchandising a large catalogue where site search relevance is the main conversion levernot Roxhill
  • Building weblayers and email content from the same customer profile without duplicating logic in two toolsnot Roxhill
  • Running campaign analytics over raw events instead of exporting to a separate warehouse and BI stacknot Roxhill

Roxhill

  • A UK in-house press office that needs journalist contacts with current pitching preferences rather than a scraped byline list.not Bloomreach
  • An agency tracking forward features across UK trade and consumer titles to place clients into planned coverage months ahead.not Bloomreach
  • A communications team monitoring named spokespeople and measuring their share of voice against competitors in UK media.not Bloomreach
  • A UK public sector body procuring through G-Cloud that needs EEA-hosted media monitoring with a published framework price band.not Bloomreach

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Bloomreach

  • The three products have separate origins, separate pricing units and separate onboarding, so a single bundled quote hides which parts you are actually committing to.
  • Engagement is priced on tracked profiles, so a customer database that keeps every inactive account raises the bill whether or not those people are ever messaged.
  • The flexibility of the data model and Jinja templating needs technical ownership, and marketing teams without a developer typically use a fraction of the product they pay for.
  • Content is the least invested of the three lines and buyers evaluating it against dedicated headless CMS vendors usually find the gap widening.
  • Support and implementation quality vary between the Bratislava engineering base for Engagement and the US organisation, and escalation paths differ by product.

Roxhill

  • The database is UK-centric by reviewers’ own account, with weak US, Australian and broader Asian journalist coverage, so any multi-market programme needs a second vendor and the single-vendor cost case disappears.
  • Contact records go stale: reviewers report old email addresses and phone numbers, distribution bounces, and there is no self-serve verification step before you send.
  • At roughly 200,000 to 300,000 journalists it is far smaller than the million-plus figures Cision and Prowly claim, with repeated complaints about thin trade, academic and journal coverage.
  • Selling is annual only with no monthly plan and a trial functionally restricted to around two weeks, so you cannot genuinely pilot before a twelve-month commitment, which is a poor fit for project or retainer agency work.
  • Licence bands are 1, 3 and 5 seats, and extra logins, workspaces, smart folders, historical search, share of voice and the spokespeople platform are all chargeable add-ons, so a team of eight to fifteen pays well above any headline band.
  • Search behaviour is described as counter-intuitive and sometimes returns implausibly few results, which means a null result cannot be trusted and lists need manual cross-checking.
  • Monitoring accuracy takes time to settle after switching, so coverage is missed in the first weeks after a cutover, which is a real gap risk if you time the migration badly.

Pricing, plan by plan

Bloomreach

On request
  • Bloomreach Engagement$undefined/year
    • Priced by tracked customer profiles and event volume
    • Channels and AI modules licensed separately
    • Annual contract
  • Bloomreach Discovery$undefined/year
    • Priced by search and recommendation request volume
    • Catalogue size and traffic bands
    • Annual contract

Roxhill

On request
  • Core$undefined/year
    • 1 licence
    • Standard database access
    • Journalist Assistant
  • Boutique$undefined/year
    • 3 licences
    • Adds press release distribution
    • 3 workspaces, 6 smart folders, 10 spokespeople, 3 newsletters
  • Enterprise$undefined/year
    • 5 licences
    • 5 workspaces, 10 smart folders, 5 newsletters
    • Spokespeople platform
  • Premium$undefined/year
    • Everything in Enterprise
    • Insights analysis and bespoke reporting
    • Competitor share of voice

Which should you pick?

Choose Bloomreach if

  • You need engagement cdp.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android, REST API.
  • You also want campaign orchestration.
Bloomreach review

Choose Roxhill if

  • You need journalist database.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want journalist profiles.
Roxhill review

Questions people ask

Is Bloomreach or Roxhill better?
Neither clearly leads. Bloomreach starts at On request and Roxhill at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Bloomreach or Roxhill?
Bloomreach starts at On request and Roxhill at On request.
Does Bloomreach or Roxhill run on more platforms?
Bloomreach runs on Web, iOS, Android, REST API. Roxhill runs on Web, iOS, Android.
What is Bloomreach best used for?
Bloomreach is most often used for a retailer replacing a legacy esp that needs event-level segmentation rather than list-based sending, merchandising a large catalogue where site search relevance is the main conversion lever, building weblayers and email content from the same customer profile without duplicating logic in two tools, running campaign analytics over raw events instead of exporting to a separate warehouse and bi stack. Of those, a retailer replacing a legacy esp that needs event-level segmentation rather than list-based sending and merchandising a large catalogue where site search relevance is the main conversion lever are not what Roxhill is typically brought in for.
What can Bloomreach do that Roxhill cannot?
Bloomreach covers Engagement CDP, Campaign orchestration, Discovery search, Recommendations. Roxhill covers Journalist database, Journalist profiles, Media lists and distribution, Media requests and alerts.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Bloomreach: Is Engagement just Exponea renamed?

It is the Exponea product line, continued and extended after the 2021 acquisition, with its engineering still centred in Slovakia. Buying it standalone is common.

Roxhill: How much does Roxhill cost?

Not published on the vendor site, but the UK G-Cloud 14 listing discloses £6,450 to £25,000 per instance per year. Use that as your anchor.

Bloomreach: Do we have to take Discovery to get Engagement?

No. They are sold and priced separately, and plenty of customers run Engagement alongside a different search vendor.

Roxhill: Is Roxhill owned by Cision or Access Intelligence?

No. Companies House shows a single individual holding over 75% of shares and no corporate PSC. It is founder-controlled and unfunded. Note the founder previously sold Gorkana to Cision, so ask for a change-of-control clause.

Bloomreach: How is it priced?

Engagement by tracked profiles and event volume, Discovery by request volume. Neither is published, and both are annual commitments.

Roxhill: Is it usable for US or APAC media relations?

Not well. Reviewers describe US, Australian and Asian coverage as materially weaker than UK. Budget for a second database.

Roxhill: Can I buy monthly?

No. Contracts are annual, sales-gated, with a trial of around two weeks.

Share

Related pages

More on Bloomreach

More on Roxhill

Keep looking

Other head to heads