Nonprofits · head to head
Raisely vs Submittable

Raisely
Nonprofits
Peer to peer and campaign fundraising platform funded by optional donor tips rather than a platform fee
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Submittable
Nonprofits
Application, review and grant management for funders running open calls at volume
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Raisely the tip model performs unevenly, so an organisation with an older or offline recruited donor base sees a lower tip rate and quietly absorbs more of the platform cost than the model assumes.; Submittable pricing is not published and tier jumps are steep, so an organisation that grows past a submission or form limit can face a renewal quote well above the previous year with limited negotiating room mid-programme.
- They diverge on capability: Raisely covers Peer to peer fundraising, Submittable covers Configurable application forms.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Raisely and Submittable actually diverge.
| Attribute | Raisely | Submittable |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Free core platform funded by optional donor tips | quote |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Nonprofits).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Raisely
- Peer to peer fundraising
- Customisable campaign pages
- Recurring giving
- Matched giving and appeals
- Open API and webhooks
- Automations
Only in Submittable
- Configurable application forms
- Blind and multi-stage review
- Reviewer management
- Grant payments
- Impact reporting
- Applicant messaging
- API and integrations
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Raisely
- A charity running a challenge or endurance event where supporters raise money on their own pagesnot Submittable
- A campaign team that wants each appeal to look bespoke without rebuilding infrastructure each timenot Submittable
- An organisation unwilling to give a platform a percentage of a large peer to peer income linenot Submittable
- A digital team with front end skills or an agency partner who will customise the supporter journeynot Submittable
Submittable
- A foundation running an open grant round where a volunteer panel must score hundreds of applications without seeing applicant identitiesnot Raisely
- A corporate giving team collecting employee-nominated grant requests and needing an audit trail for financenot Raisely
- An arts council managing fellowship and residency applications with multi-stage juriesnot Raisely
- A city agency distributing relief funds and required to show equitable review and decision recordsnot Raisely
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Raisely
- The tip model performs unevenly, so an organisation with an older or offline recruited donor base sees a lower tip rate and quietly absorbs more of the platform cost than the model assumes.
- It is a campaign platform, not a CRM, so supporter data must be synced onward and organisations that skip that step lose cross channel giving history.
- Getting the most out of the customisation requires front end capability, and charities without it run campaigns that look like the default template while paying for a platform built for the opposite.
- Support hours are anchored to Australian time zones, which leaves European and North American teams waiting overnight during a live campaign.
- Payment processing is tied to a small set of processors, so organisations with an existing merchant relationship or unusual regional payment needs may not be able to keep it.
Submittable
- Pricing is not published and tier jumps are steep, so an organisation that grows past a submission or form limit can face a renewal quote well above the previous year with limited negotiating room mid-programme.
- It is built around the application funnel rather than the funder's relationship with grantees, so long-term relationship management, pledge tracking and multi-year commitments are weaker than in a purpose-built grants CRM.
- Applicant-facing forms are constrained by the platform's templates, and organisations wanting a fully branded application experience on their own domain will find the customisation shallow.
- Reporting is serviceable for programme counts but limited for board-level financial reporting, so many finance teams still export to spreadsheets to reconcile awards against the general ledger.
- Payment disbursement capability varies by tier and region, and organisations funding recipients outside the United States often still pay grants through their bank rather than through the platform.
Pricing, plan by plan
Raisely
On request- Raisely$undefined/year
- No platform percentage charged to the organisation on the core plan
- Donors are prompted to add an optional contribution to the platform at checkout
- Card processing is charged separately by the payment processor
Submittable
On request- Submittable$undefined/year
- Application forms and applicant portal
- Reviewer workflow and scoring rubrics
- Grant award and reporting modules on higher tiers
Which should you pick?
Choose Raisely if
- You need peer to peer fundraising.
- You also want customisable campaign pages.
Choose Submittable if
- You need configurable application forms.
- You also want blind and multi-stage review.
Questions people ask
- Is Raisely or Submittable better?
- Neither clearly leads. Raisely starts at On request and Submittable at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Raisely or Submittable?
- Raisely starts at On request and Submittable at On request.
- Does Raisely or Submittable run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Raisely best used for?
- Raisely is most often used for a charity running a challenge or endurance event where supporters raise money on their own pages, a campaign team that wants each appeal to look bespoke without rebuilding infrastructure each time, an organisation unwilling to give a platform a percentage of a large peer to peer income line, a digital team with front end skills or an agency partner who will customise the supporter journey. Of those, a charity running a challenge or endurance event where supporters raise money on their own pages and a campaign team that wants each appeal to look bespoke without rebuilding infrastructure each time are not what Submittable is typically brought in for.
- What can Raisely do that Submittable cannot?
- Raisely covers Peer to peer fundraising, Customisable campaign pages, Recurring giving, Matched giving and appeals. Submittable covers Configurable application forms, Blind and multi-stage review, Reviewer management, Grant payments.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Raisely: How does Raisely make money if there is no platform fee?
Donors are prompted to add a voluntary contribution to the platform at checkout, and some organisations pay for plans that remove the prompt.
Submittable: What does Submittable actually cost?
It is not published. Reported entry points are in the low thousands of dollars a year, with price driven by submission volume, number of forms and seats. Get the tier limits written into the contract before signing.
Raisely: Does the tip prompt reduce donation totals?
It changes the checkout, and results vary by audience. Test it against your own list rather than relying on published averages.
Submittable: Is it a grants management system or a submission manager?
Both, depending on tier. The review side is its strength. Award tracking, payments and grantee reporting sit on higher tiers and are less deep than a dedicated grants CRM.
Raisely: Is it a donor CRM?
No. It runs campaigns and pushes data to a CRM through the API or an integration.
Submittable: Can reviewers work anonymously?
Yes. Blind review, staged rounds and conflict of interest flagging are core features rather than paid extras.
Raisely: Who is it best for?
Peer to peer and challenge event fundraising where a percentage platform fee on high volume would be the largest single cost.
Submittable: Is there a nonprofit discount?
Nonprofit pricing exists but is applied inside the quote rather than published as a percentage, so compare quotes rather than assuming a standard rate.
Related pages
More on Submittable
Other head to heads
- Raisely vs Classy
- Raisely vs Givebutter
- Raisely vs Funraise
- Raisely vs Give Lively
- Raisely vs Qgiv
- Raisely vs GiveSmart
- Raisely vs Blackbaud Raiser's Edge
- Raisely vs GuideStar
- Raisely vs Wild Apricot
- Raisely vs Salsa CRM
- Raisely vs CharityEngine
- Raisely vs Handbid
- Raisely vs Foundant Technologies
- Raisely vs Fundraise Up
- Raisely vs Get Connected
- Raisely vs Google Nonprofit Tools
- Raisely vs SmartSimple Cloud
- Raisely vs Blackbaud Grantmaking
- Raisely vs Instrumentl
- Raisely vs Fluxx
- Raisely vs GrantStation
- Raisely vs Bonterra
- Raisely vs DonorPerfect
- Raisely vs Candid
- Raisely vs Glue Up
- Raisely vs Salesforce for Nonprofits
- Raisely vs Virtuous
- Submittable vs Classy
- Submittable vs Givebutter
- Submittable vs Funraise
- Submittable vs Give Lively
- Submittable vs Qgiv
- Submittable vs GiveSmart
- Submittable vs Blackbaud Raiser's Edge
- Submittable vs GuideStar
- Submittable vs Wild Apricot
- Submittable vs Salsa CRM
- Submittable vs CharityEngine
- Submittable vs Handbid
- Submittable vs Foundant Technologies
- Submittable vs Fundraise Up
- Submittable vs Get Connected
- Submittable vs Google Nonprofit Tools
- Submittable vs SmartSimple Cloud
- Submittable vs Blackbaud Grantmaking
- Submittable vs Instrumentl
- Submittable vs Fluxx
- Submittable vs GrantStation
- Submittable vs Bonterra
- Submittable vs DonorPerfect
- Submittable vs Candid
- Submittable vs Glue Up
- Submittable vs Salesforce for Nonprofits
- Submittable vs Virtuous
