Softwr

Proposals · head to head

Prospect vs Subskribe

Prospect logo

Prospect

Proposals

VR for architectural visualization

From
$225/month
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Subskribe logo

Subskribe

Proposals

Quote-to-revenue platform built by former Zuora staff to keep CPQ, billing and revenue recognition on one data model

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Prospect no longer available as a standalone product; has been discontinued and replaced by other solutions; Subskribe the vendor own calculator points to roughly 140,000 USD per year as a starting point, which puts it out of reach for small companies and makes it a finance systems decision rather than a sales tooling one.
  • They diverge on capability: Prospect covers BIM visualization, Subskribe covers Unified order model.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Prospect and Subskribe actually diverge.

Attributes where Prospect and Subskribe differ
AttributeProspectSubskribe
Starting price$225/monthOn request
Pricing modelUnknownquote
PlatformsVR Headsets (Oculus Rift, HTC Vive, Meta Quest)Web
Founded2014Unknown

Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Proposals).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Prospect

  • BIM visualization
  • Real-scale viewing
  • Collaboration
  • Annotations
  • Revit
  • SketchUp
  • Rhino
  • Navisworks

Only in Subskribe

  • Unified order model
  • Ramp and amendment handling
  • Usage-based billing
  • ASC 606 revenue recognition
  • Approval workflows
  • CRM integration

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Prospect

  • VR Gamingnot Subskribe
  • AR Marketingnot Subskribe
  • Virtual Trainingnot Subskribe
  • 3D Visualizationnot Subskribe
  • Immersive Experiencesnot Subskribe

Subskribe

  • A SaaS company whose deals routinely include ramped commitments and mid-term amendments that break a conventional CPQnot Prospect
  • Finance teams closing the books with a spreadsheet that reconciles signed orders against invoices every monthnot Prospect
  • Preparing for audit or an IPO process where the revenue schedule has to be defensible and traceable to the ordernot Prospect
  • Replacing a split CPQ and billing stack whose integration has become the most fragile system in the companynot Prospect

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Prospect

  • No longer available as a standalone product; has been discontinued and replaced by other solutions
  • Acquisition by The Wild in 2021 resulted in product discontinuation and transition to Workshop XR
  • No ongoing development, bug fixes, or feature updates since acquisition

Subskribe

  • The vendor own calculator points to roughly 140,000 USD per year as a starting point, which puts it out of reach for small companies and makes it a finance systems decision rather than a sales tooling one.
  • No pricing is published anywhere, so a like-for-like comparison against alternatives requires running a full sales cycle with each vendor before any numbers exist.
  • Adopting it means moving your revenue system of record to a young company, and migrating live contracts and historical schedules is a multi-month finance project rather than a configuration exercise.
  • The implementation partner and consultant ecosystem is small next to Salesforce CPQ or Conga, so if the internal project stalls there are few outside firms to bring in.
  • It expects to own the order record even when the CRM stays in place, which means sales teams work partly outside Salesforce and adoption depends on that being accepted rather than fought.

Pricing, plan by plan

Prospect

$225/month
  • Team$350/month
    • Multiuser VR collaboration
    • Design review tools
    • Voice communication

Subskribe

On request
  • Subskribe Quote-to-Revenue$undefined/year
    • Quoted per organisation, no published price list
    • CPQ, billing and revenue recognition in one contract
    • The vendor own pricing calculator estimates roughly 140,000 USD per year for a sample company profile

Which should you pick?

Choose Prospect if

  • You need bim visualization.
  • You work on VR Headsets (Oculus Rift, HTC Vive, Meta Quest).
  • You also want real-scale viewing.
Prospect review

Choose Subskribe if

  • You need unified order model.
  • You also want ramp and amendment handling.
Subskribe review

Questions people ask

Is Prospect or Subskribe better?
Neither clearly leads. Prospect starts at $225/month and Subskribe at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Prospect or Subskribe?
Prospect starts at $225/month and Subskribe at On request.
Does Prospect or Subskribe run on more platforms?
Prospect runs on VR Headsets (Oculus Rift, HTC Vive, Meta Quest). Subskribe runs on Web.
What is Prospect best used for?
Prospect is most often used for vr gaming, ar marketing, virtual training, 3d visualization. Of those, vr gaming and ar marketing are not what Subskribe is typically brought in for.
What can Prospect do that Subskribe cannot?
Prospect covers BIM visualization, Real-scale viewing, Collaboration, Annotations. Subskribe covers Unified order model, Ramp and amendment handling, Usage-based billing, ASC 606 revenue recognition.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Prospect: What is Prospect by IrisVR?

Prospect was an immersive VR application that converted 3D design files from Revit, Rhino, SketchUp, and Navisworks into virtual reality walkthroughs with one click. It enabled AEC teams to conduct design reviews, collaborate in VR, and present projects to clients immersively.

Source
Subskribe: What does Subskribe cost?

It is not published. The vendor pricing calculator produces estimates around 140,000 USD per year for a full quote-to-revenue deployment on a sample profile.

Prospect: Is Prospect still available?

No. Prospect by IrisVR was acquired by The Wild in February 2021 and has been discontinued. Autodesk Workshop XR is now the recommended successor for AEC teams migrating from Prospect.

Source
Subskribe: Can I buy just the CPQ?

Yes, CPQ, Billing and the combined Quote-to-Revenue package are sold separately, all on quoted pricing.

Prospect: How was Prospect priced?

Prospect's Team plan cost approximately $350 per workstation per month when billed annually. Earlier pricing information from 2020 showed starting prices around $225. Custom enterprise pricing was available.

Source
Subskribe: Does it replace Salesforce?

No. It integrates with Salesforce or HubSpot for CRM but keeps the order, billing and revenue record in Subskribe.

Prospect: What VR headsets did Prospect support?

Prospect was compatible with major VR headsets including Oculus Rift, HTC Vive, and later Meta Quest. Support depended on the runtime and connection method available.

Source
Subskribe: Why not just use a CPQ plus a billing tool?

That works until deals have ramps and amendments. The reconciliation between the two systems is the cost Subskribe is designed to remove.

Prospect: What was Prospect's biggest advantage?

Prospect's one-click conversion from native design files (Revit, Rhino, SketchUp) into immersive VR experiences was its primary value proposition, enabling non-VR specialists to easily create compelling design reviews and client presentations.

Source
Share

Related pages

More on Prospect

More on Subskribe

Keep looking

Other head to heads