Technology · head to head
PostHog vs VWO

PostHog
Technology
The single platform to analyze, test, observe, and deploy new features
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: PostHog the free tier covers 1M events, 5K web session recordings and 2.5K mobile recordings per month before usage-based billing starts; VWO growth plan restricted to 1 workspace and 0 custom attributes
- They diverge on capability: PostHog covers Product analytics, VWO covers Multivariate testing.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which PostHog and VWO actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (usage-based), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in PostHog
- Product analytics
- Session recording
- Feature flags
- SQL access
- Data warehouse
- Apps platform
- Microsoft Teams
- Zapier
Only in VWO
- Multivariate testing
- Session recordings
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- SSL encryption
- Web support
- 20+ languages language support
Both cover
- A/B testing
- Heatmaps
- Slack
- Cloud deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
PostHog
- Product analyticsnot VWO
- Feature experimentationnot VWO
- User behavior trackingnot VWO
- A/B testingnot VWO
- Debug production issuesnot VWO
VWO
- A/B testing and multivariate testingnot PostHog
- Conversion rate optimisationnot PostHog
- Behavioural analytics and session recordingsnot PostHog
- Feature experimentation and progressive rolloutsnot PostHog
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
PostHog
- The free tier covers 1M events, 5K web session recordings and 2.5K mobile recordings per month before usage-based billing starts
- Accounts without a card on file are limited to 1 project; adding one raises it to 6
- Data retention is 1 year until a card is added, which extends it to 7 years
- Support is community-only until the account is on a paid plan
- Error tracking is capped at 100K exceptions and surveys at 1500 responses per month on the free tier
VWO
- Growth plan restricted to 1 workspace and 0 custom attributes
- Single Sign-On (SSO) and API access limited to Enterprise tier only
- Growth plan offers only 8-hour first response time for support
Pricing, plan by plan
PostHog
Free- FreeFree
- 1M events/month
- 5K sessions/month
- Unlimited users
- Paid$undefined/month
- $0.00031/event
- $0.005/session
- Advanced permissions
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- SAML SSO
- Advanced security
- Dedicated support
VWO
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the VWO review.
Which should you pick?
Choose PostHog if
- You need product analytics.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- You also want session recording.
Choose VWO if
- You need multivariate testing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Server-side.
- You also want session recordings.
Questions people ask
- Is PostHog or VWO better?
- Neither clearly leads. PostHog starts at Free and VWO at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, PostHog or VWO?
- PostHog starts at Free and VWO at Free.
- Does PostHog or VWO run on more platforms?
- PostHog runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api. VWO runs on Web, iOS, Android, Server-side.
- Can I use PostHog for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is PostHog best used for?
- PostHog is most often used for product analytics, feature experimentation, user behavior tracking, a/b testing. Of those, product analytics and feature experimentation are not what VWO is typically brought in for.
- What can PostHog do that VWO cannot?
- PostHog covers Product analytics, Session recording, Feature flags, SQL access. VWO covers Multivariate testing, Session recordings, Analytics, Google Analytics. Both handle A/B testing, Heatmaps, Slack, Cloud deployment.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- PostHog vs Asana
- PostHog vs ClickUp
- PostHog vs Figma
- PostHog vs Linear
- PostHog vs Monday.com
- PostHog vs Greenhouse
- PostHog vs Notion
- PostHog vs Amplitude
- PostHog vs Datadog
- PostHog vs PyCharm
- PostHog vs Sketch
- PostHog vs Docker
- PostHog vs Netlify
- PostHog vs Okta
- PostHog vs Aha!
- PostHog vs Coda
- PostHog vs Dashlane
- PostHog vs GitHub
- PostHog vs Crazy Egg
- PostHog vs Ruler Analytics
- PostHog vs Northbeam
- PostHog vs Attribution
- PostHog vs Countly
- PostHog vs Dreamdata
- PostHog vs Google Analytics
- PostHog vs Triple Whale
- PostHog vs AB Tasty
- PostHog vs Adobe Analytics
- PostHog vs Adverity
- PostHog vs Convert
- PostHog vs Datorama
- PostHog vs Fathom Analytics
- PostHog vs Funnel.io
- PostHog vs Google Optimize
- PostHog vs Improvado
- PostHog vs June
- VWO vs Asana
- VWO vs ClickUp
- VWO vs Figma
- VWO vs Linear
- VWO vs Monday.com
- VWO vs Greenhouse
- VWO vs Notion
- VWO vs Amplitude
- VWO vs Datadog
- VWO vs PyCharm
- VWO vs Sketch
- VWO vs Docker
- VWO vs Netlify
- VWO vs Okta
- VWO vs Aha!
- VWO vs Coda
- VWO vs Dashlane
- VWO vs GitHub
- VWO vs Crazy Egg
- VWO vs Ruler Analytics
- VWO vs Northbeam
- VWO vs Attribution
- VWO vs Countly
- VWO vs Dreamdata
- VWO vs Google Analytics
- VWO vs Triple Whale
- VWO vs AB Tasty
- VWO vs Adobe Analytics
- VWO vs Adverity
- VWO vs Convert
- VWO vs Datorama
- VWO vs Fathom Analytics
- VWO vs Funnel.io
- VWO vs Google Optimize
- VWO vs Improvado
- VWO vs June

