Databases · head to head
Dgraph vs PostgreSQL

Dgraph
Databases
Apache 2.0 distributed graph database written in Go, maintained by Hypermode, queried through GraphQL or its own DQL language.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

PostgreSQL
Databases
The world's most advanced open source relational database
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Dgraph sharding is by predicate, so a single very hot predicate lives entirely in one Raft group and cannot be split further; adding nodes does not relieve it and the fix is a data model change.; PostgreSQL requires manual scaling across multiple machines for very large deployments
- They diverge on capability: Dgraph covers Apache 2.0 licence, PostgreSQL covers ACID Compliance.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Dgraph and PostgreSQL actually diverge.
| Attribute | Dgraph | PostgreSQL |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Unknown |
| Platforms | Linux, Mac, Docker, Web | Linux, Windows, macOS, BSD, Unix |
| Founded | 2016 | 1996 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Dgraph
- Apache 2.0 licence
- Generated GraphQL API
- DQL query language
- Predicate sharding
- Raft replication
- Distributed ACID transactions
- Written in Go
- Full-text and geo indexing
Only in PostgreSQL
- ACID Compliance
- JSON/JSONB Support
- Full-text Search
- Extensibility
- Advanced Indexing
- Partitioning
- Replication
- pgAdmin
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Dgraph
- An application whose core data is a graph, such as permissions, social connections or product relationships, where the frontend already consumes GraphQLnot PostgreSQL
- A knowledge graph that outgrew a single machine and needs storage distributed across nodes without a per-core licence negotiationnot PostgreSQL
- Recommendation or fraud-detection features that traverse several hops at request time, where a relational join chain has become the bottlenecknot PostgreSQL
- Teams that want a graph database they can read, fork and self-host under a permissive licence rather than a source-available onenot PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
- Transaction processingnot Dgraph
- Data storagenot Dgraph
- Application backendnot Dgraph
- Reportingnot Dgraph
- Data analyticsnot Dgraph
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Dgraph
- Sharding is by predicate, so a single very hot predicate lives entirely in one Raft group and cannot be split further; adding nodes does not relieve it and the fix is a data model change.
- Stewardship passed from Dgraph Labs to Hypermode after the original company stopped operating independently, so anyone building on it is betting on a second custodian rather than on the original team's roadmap.
- The GraphQL layer is generated and opinionated, so anything it does not express drops you into DQL, which is a second language your team must learn and which no other database speaks.
- The community is a fraction of Neo4j's, so operational answers, tuning experience, hiring and third-party tooling are all thinner, and unusual failure modes in a Zero and Alpha cluster leave you reading source rather than a forum.
- There is no portable graph standard to migrate to; Cypher, Gremlin and SPARQL are all different query models, so the schema and every query is a rewrite if you later leave, and that cost grows with the application.
PostgreSQL
- Requires manual scaling across multiple machines for very large deployments
- Performance tuning requires deep knowledge of database internals
- No built-in graphical admin interface; command-line tools are primary method
Pricing, plan by plan
Dgraph
Free- CommunityFree
- Native GraphQL
- Graph queries
- Full-text search
- Cloud$39/month
- Managed service
- Auto-scaling
- Enterprise support
PostgreSQL
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the PostgreSQL review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Dgraph if
- You need apache 2.0 licence.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Mac, Docker, Web.
- You also want generated graphql api.
Choose PostgreSQL if
- You need acid compliance.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, BSD, Unix.
- You also want json/jsonb support.
Questions people ask
- Is Dgraph or PostgreSQL better?
- Neither clearly leads. Dgraph starts at Free and PostgreSQL at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Dgraph or PostgreSQL?
- Dgraph starts at Free and PostgreSQL at Free.
- Does Dgraph or PostgreSQL run on more platforms?
- Dgraph runs on Linux, Mac, Docker, Web. PostgreSQL runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, BSD, Unix.
- Can I use Dgraph for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Dgraph best used for?
- Dgraph is most often used for an application whose core data is a graph, such as permissions, social connections or product relationships, where the frontend already consumes graphql, a knowledge graph that outgrew a single machine and needs storage distributed across nodes without a per-core licence negotiation, recommendation or fraud-detection features that traverse several hops at request time, where a relational join chain has become the bottleneck, teams that want a graph database they can read, fork and self-host under a permissive licence rather than a source-available one. Of those, an application whose core data is a graph, such as permissions, social connections or product relationships, where the frontend already consumes graphql and a knowledge graph that outgrew a single machine and needs storage distributed across nodes without a per-core licence negotiation are not what PostgreSQL is typically brought in for.
- What can Dgraph do that PostgreSQL cannot?
- Dgraph covers Apache 2.0 licence, Generated GraphQL API, DQL query language, Predicate sharding. PostgreSQL covers ACID Compliance, JSON/JSONB Support, Full-text Search, Extensibility.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Dgraph: Is Dgraph open source?
Yes. The current repository is Apache 2.0, which is a permissive OSI licence, and the project is at v25 under Hypermode's maintenance.
PostgreSQL: Is PostgreSQL completely free?
Yes. PostgreSQL is completely free and open source with no licensing fees or restrictions on use.
SourceDgraph: Is it really GraphQL?
It serves a generated GraphQL API, which is real GraphQL for clients. Its native language, DQL, resembles GraphQL syntactically but is Dgraph's own language and is not the GraphQL specification.
PostgreSQL: What platforms does PostgreSQL run on?
PostgreSQL runs on all major operating systems including Linux, Windows, macOS, BSD, and commercial Unix variants, and has been proven highly scalable managing terabytes to petabytes of data.
SourceDgraph: How does it compare to Neo4j?
Neo4j has the larger ecosystem, Cypher, and far more operational precedent. Dgraph distributes storage across nodes by default and gives you a GraphQL endpoint without writing resolvers. The choice usually turns on whether you need horizontal scale and a GraphQL surface more than you need ecosystem depth.
PostgreSQL: What procedural languages are supported?
PostgreSQL supports stored functions and procedures in multiple languages including PL/pgSQL, Perl, Python, Tcl, Java, JavaScript, R, and Rust.
SourceDgraph: What does a production cluster look like?
At minimum a set of Zero nodes for coordination and a replicated set of Alpha nodes for data, typically three of each for fault tolerance, which is a meaningfully larger operational footprint than a single graph server.
PostgreSQL: What is ACID compliance in PostgreSQL?
PostgreSQL has been ACID-compliant since 2001, ensuring data integrity through atomicity, consistency, isolation, and durability guarantees for all transactions.
SourceDgraph: Who maintains it now?
Hypermode. Dgraph Labs, the original company, no longer operates it, and that change of custodian is the main non-technical risk to weigh.
PostgreSQL: Does PostgreSQL support JSON data?
Yes. PostgreSQL supports JSON and JSONB data types for storing and querying JSON documents, along with XML and other document formats.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Dgraph vs Cockroach Labs
- Dgraph vs Airtable
- Dgraph vs Amazon Aurora
- Dgraph vs Neo4j
- Dgraph vs ArangoDB
- Dgraph vs Elasticsearch
- Dgraph vs Couchbase
- Dgraph vs Cassandra
- Dgraph vs FaunaDB
- Dgraph vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Dgraph vs RavenDB
- Dgraph vs Convex
- Dgraph vs Dragonfly
- Dgraph vs Dremio
- Dgraph vs Fivetran HVR
- Dgraph vs Grist
- Dgraph vs IBM Db2
- Dgraph vs MariaDB
- Dgraph vs Oracle Database
- Dgraph vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Dgraph vs DuckDB
- Dgraph vs Aiven
- Dgraph vs SQLite
- Dgraph vs QuestDB
- Dgraph vs Firestore
- Dgraph vs Amazon Redshift
- Dgraph vs Apache Pinot
- Dgraph vs DataGrip
- Dgraph vs Apache Pulsar
- Dgraph vs CouchDB
- PostgreSQL vs Cockroach Labs
- PostgreSQL vs Airtable
- PostgreSQL vs Amazon Aurora
- PostgreSQL vs Neo4j
- PostgreSQL vs ArangoDB
- PostgreSQL vs Elasticsearch
- PostgreSQL vs Couchbase
- PostgreSQL vs Cassandra
- PostgreSQL vs FaunaDB
- PostgreSQL vs Firebase Realtime Database
- PostgreSQL vs RavenDB
- PostgreSQL vs Convex
- PostgreSQL vs Dragonfly
- PostgreSQL vs Dremio
- PostgreSQL vs Fivetran HVR
- PostgreSQL vs Grist
- PostgreSQL vs IBM Db2
- PostgreSQL vs MariaDB
- PostgreSQL vs Oracle Database
- PostgreSQL vs Microsoft SQL Server
- PostgreSQL vs DuckDB
- PostgreSQL vs Aiven
- PostgreSQL vs SQLite
- PostgreSQL vs QuestDB
- PostgreSQL vs Firestore
- PostgreSQL vs Amazon Redshift
- PostgreSQL vs Apache Pinot
- PostgreSQL vs DataGrip
- PostgreSQL vs Apache Pulsar
- PostgreSQL vs CouchDB
