Databases · head to head
PostgreSQL vs TiDB

PostgreSQL
Databases
The world's most advanced open source relational database
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

TiDB
Databases
Apache 2.0 distributed SQL database with MySQL wire compatibility and a separate columnar replica for analytical queries.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: PostgreSQL requires manual scaling across multiple machines for very large deployments; TiDB a production cluster needs several placement driver, storage and SQL nodes before it is fault tolerant, so the minimum viable footprint is far larger than a MySQL server and TiDB is never the economical choice for a small database.
- They diverge on capability: PostgreSQL covers ACID Compliance, TiDB covers MySQL wire compatibility.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which PostgreSQL and TiDB actually diverge.
| Attribute | PostgreSQL | TiDB |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | freemium |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows, macOS, BSD, Unix | Cloud, AWS, Azure, Google Cloud Platform, Self-managed |
| Founded | 1996 | 2015 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in PostgreSQL
- ACID Compliance
- JSON/JSONB Support
- Full-text Search
- Extensibility
- Advanced Indexing
- Partitioning
- Replication
- pgAdmin
Only in TiDB
- MySQL wire compatibility
- Horizontal write scaling
- Distributed ACID transactions
- TiFlash columnar replica
- Automatic rebalancing
- Raft replication
- Apache 2.0 licence
- Online schema change
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
PostgreSQL
- Transaction processingnot TiDB
- Data storagenot TiDB
- Application backendnot TiDB
- Reportingnot TiDB
- Data analyticsnot TiDB
TiDB
- A MySQL workload that has hit the write ceiling of a single primary and would otherwise need an application-level sharding layernot PostgreSQL
- Reporting that must run against current transactional data, where the columnar replica removes the delay and the cost of an ETL pipelinenot PostgreSQL
- Multi-region deployments needing a single logical database with automatic failover rather than manual primary promotionnot PostgreSQL
- Migrating off a sharded MySQL estate where the sharding logic in the application has become the main source of bugs and operational toilnot PostgreSQL
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
PostgreSQL
- Requires manual scaling across multiple machines for very large deployments
- Performance tuning requires deep knowledge of database internals
- No built-in graphical admin interface; command-line tools are primary method
TiDB
- A production cluster needs several placement driver, storage and SQL nodes before it is fault tolerant, so the minimum viable footprint is far larger than a MySQL server and TiDB is never the economical choice for a small database.
- Every transaction takes a timestamp from the placement driver and crosses the network to storage nodes, so simple point queries are slower than on single-node MySQL and latency-sensitive paths need to be measured, not assumed.
- MySQL compatibility is at the wire and dialect level but not complete; stored procedures, triggers and events are not supported, so an application that pushed logic into the database cannot simply be repointed.
- The columnar replica is an extra full copy of the data on its own nodes, so hybrid analytics roughly doubles storage and adds hardware that must be sized and paid for separately.
- Operating it well requires cluster-specific expertise in TiUP or the Kubernetes operator, region hot spots, and rebalancing behaviour, so the licence is free but the running cost includes an engineer who understands distributed storage.
Pricing, plan by plan
PostgreSQL
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the PostgreSQL review.
TiDB
Free- ServerlessFree
- 5GB storage
- 50M request units
- Free forever tier
- Dedicated$250/month
- Dedicated resources
- SLA guarantees
- Enterprise support
Which should you pick?
Choose PostgreSQL if
- You need acid compliance.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, BSD, Unix.
- You also want json/jsonb support.
Choose TiDB if
- You need mysql wire compatibility.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, AWS, Azure, Google Cloud Platform, Self-managed.
- You also want horizontal write scaling.
Questions people ask
- Is PostgreSQL or TiDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. PostgreSQL starts at Free and TiDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, PostgreSQL or TiDB?
- PostgreSQL starts at Free and TiDB at Free.
- Does PostgreSQL or TiDB run on more platforms?
- PostgreSQL runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, BSD, Unix. TiDB runs on Cloud, AWS, Azure, Google Cloud Platform, Self-managed.
- Can I use PostgreSQL for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is PostgreSQL best used for?
- PostgreSQL is most often used for transaction processing, data storage, application backend, reporting. Of those, transaction processing and data storage are not what TiDB is typically brought in for.
- What can PostgreSQL do that TiDB cannot?
- PostgreSQL covers ACID Compliance, JSON/JSONB Support, Full-text Search, Extensibility. TiDB covers MySQL wire compatibility, Horizontal write scaling, Distributed ACID transactions, TiFlash columnar replica.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
PostgreSQL: Is PostgreSQL completely free?
Yes. PostgreSQL is completely free and open source with no licensing fees or restrictions on use.
SourceTiDB: Is TiDB a drop-in replacement for MySQL?
At the protocol and dialect level it is close, and most applications connect unchanged. Stored procedures, triggers and events are not supported, and latency characteristics differ, so it needs testing rather than assumption.
PostgreSQL: What platforms does PostgreSQL run on?
PostgreSQL runs on all major operating systems including Linux, Windows, macOS, BSD, and commercial Unix variants, and has been proven highly scalable managing terabytes to petabytes of data.
SourceTiDB: What licence is it under?
Apache 2.0, for both TiDB and the underlying TiKV storage engine. TiKV is a graduated CNCF project, which is a meaningful governance signal in a market where several competitors moved to source-available licences.
PostgreSQL: What procedural languages are supported?
PostgreSQL supports stored functions and procedures in multiple languages including PL/pgSQL, Perl, Python, Tcl, Java, JavaScript, R, and Rust.
SourceTiDB: Do I need TiFlash?
Only for analytical queries. It is an optional columnar replica; without it TiDB is a distributed transactional database. With it you get analytics on live data at the cost of an additional full copy.
PostgreSQL: What is ACID compliance in PostgreSQL?
PostgreSQL has been ACID-compliant since 2001, ensuring data integrity through atomicity, consistency, isolation, and durability guarantees for all transactions.
SourceTiDB: Is the managed cloud the same software?
TiDB Cloud runs the same engine, with the control plane, scaling and operational tooling provided as a service. The entry tier is metered differently from a dedicated cluster, so the cost model rather than the engine is what changes.
PostgreSQL: Does PostgreSQL support JSON data?
Yes. PostgreSQL supports JSON and JSONB data types for storing and querying JSON documents, along with XML and other document formats.
SourceTiDB: When is TiDB the wrong choice?
When the database is small enough for one server, when latency on single-row lookups is the primary constraint, or when the application depends on MySQL stored procedures and triggers.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- PostgreSQL vs MariaDB
- PostgreSQL vs Oracle Database
- PostgreSQL vs Microsoft SQL Server
- PostgreSQL vs IBM Db2
- PostgreSQL vs Cockroach Labs
- PostgreSQL vs DuckDB
- PostgreSQL vs Aiven
- PostgreSQL vs SQLite
- PostgreSQL vs Couchbase
- PostgreSQL vs QuestDB
- PostgreSQL vs FaunaDB
- PostgreSQL vs Firestore
- PostgreSQL vs Amazon Redshift
- PostgreSQL vs Apache Pinot
- PostgreSQL vs DataGrip
- PostgreSQL vs Apache Pulsar
- PostgreSQL vs Cassandra
- PostgreSQL vs CouchDB
- PostgreSQL vs Vitess
- PostgreSQL vs Elasticsearch
- PostgreSQL vs SingleStore
- PostgreSQL vs BigQuery
- PostgreSQL vs ClickHouse
- PostgreSQL vs Apache Druid
- PostgreSQL vs TimescaleDB
- PostgreSQL vs Redpanda
- PostgreSQL vs RisingWave
- PostgreSQL vs ScyllaDB
- PostgreSQL vs Solace PubSub+
- PostgreSQL vs StarRocks
- TiDB vs MariaDB
- TiDB vs Oracle Database
- TiDB vs Microsoft SQL Server
- TiDB vs IBM Db2
- TiDB vs Cockroach Labs
- TiDB vs DuckDB
- TiDB vs Aiven
- TiDB vs SQLite
- TiDB vs Couchbase
- TiDB vs QuestDB
- TiDB vs FaunaDB
- TiDB vs Firestore
- TiDB vs Amazon Redshift
- TiDB vs Apache Pinot
- TiDB vs DataGrip
- TiDB vs Apache Pulsar
- TiDB vs Cassandra
- TiDB vs CouchDB
- TiDB vs Vitess
- TiDB vs Elasticsearch
- TiDB vs SingleStore
- TiDB vs BigQuery
- TiDB vs ClickHouse
- TiDB vs Apache Druid
- TiDB vs TimescaleDB
- TiDB vs Redpanda
- TiDB vs RisingWave
- TiDB vs ScyllaDB
- TiDB vs Solace PubSub+
- TiDB vs StarRocks
