Softwr

Cybersecurity · head to head

Passbolt vs Webpack

Passbolt logo

Passbolt

Cybersecurity

Open-source password manager for teams with self-hosted or cloud deployment

From
Free
Free plan
Yes
Webpack logo

Webpack

Developer Tools

Bundle your assets, scripts, images, and styles

From
Free
Free plan
Yes

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Passbolt pro Edition requires a minimum of 10 users, making it costlier for very small teams.; Webpack complex configuration can be challenging for beginners compared to zero-config alternatives
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Passbolt and Webpack actually diverge.

Attributes where Passbolt and Webpack differ
AttributePassboltWebpack
Pricing modelopen-sourceUnknown
Platformsweb, windows, mac, linux, apiNode.js, Web (browser output)
CategoryCybersecurityDeveloper Tools
FoundedUnknown2012

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Passbolt

  • Password sharing and folders
  • Groups and role-based access
  • Browser extensions and CLI
  • Open API
  • LDAP provisioning and SSO
  • Activity audit log

Only in Webpack

Nothing recorded that Passbolt does not also cover.

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Passbolt

  • Self-hosting a team password manager for data sovereigntynot Webpack
  • Provisioning vault access from an existing LDAP/AD directorynot Webpack
  • Sharing credentials across engineering or IT teams via folders and groupsnot Webpack
  • Automating credential retrieval through the CLI or open APInot Webpack

Webpack

  • Bundling modular JavaScript with automatic dependency resolutionnot Passbolt
  • Processing multiple asset types into optimized production filesnot Passbolt
  • Splitting code into vendor and application bundles for browser cachingnot Passbolt

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Passbolt

  • Pro Edition requires a minimum of 10 users, making it costlier for very small teams.
  • Community Edition lacks SSO and LDAP provisioning, which many organizations need for onboarding at scale.
  • Self-hosting the Community Edition requires infrastructure and maintenance effort compared to fully managed competitors.
  • Enterprise-tier support and HA consulting require custom, quote-based pricing rather than transparent rates.

Webpack

  • Complex configuration can be challenging for beginners compared to zero-config alternatives
  • Build times slower than Go-based bundlers like esbuild, especially for large codebases
  • Configuration fragmentation across many plugins increases maintenance burden

Pricing, plan by plan

Passbolt

Free
  • Community EditionFree
    • Unlimited users
    • Password sharing and folders
    • Role-based access control
  • Pro Edition$4.9/month
    • Minimum 10 users, billed annually
    • LDAP/AD provisioning
    • Single sign-on
  • Enterprise Edition$undefined/month
    • High availability and disaster recovery consulting
    • White-glove migration
    • Custom feature development

Webpack

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the Webpack review.

Which should you pick?

Choose Passbolt if

  • You need password sharing and folders.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on web, windows, mac, linux, api.
  • You also want groups and role-based access.

Choose Webpack if

  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Node.js, Web (browser output).

Questions people ask

Is Passbolt or Webpack better?
Neither clearly leads. Passbolt starts at Free and Webpack at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Passbolt or Webpack?
Passbolt starts at Free and Webpack at Free.
Does Passbolt or Webpack run on more platforms?
Passbolt runs on web, windows, mac, linux, api. Webpack runs on Node.js, Web (browser output).
Can I use Passbolt for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Passbolt best used for?
Passbolt is most often used for self-hosting a team password manager for data sovereignty, provisioning vault access from an existing ldap/ad directory, sharing credentials across engineering or it teams via folders and groups, automating credential retrieval through the cli or open api. Of those, self-hosting a team password manager for data sovereignty and provisioning vault access from an existing ldap/ad directory are not what Webpack is typically brought in for.
What can Passbolt do that Webpack cannot?
Passbolt covers Password sharing and folders, Groups and role-based access, Browser extensions and CLI, Open API.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Passbolt: Is Passbolt free to use?

Yes. The Community Edition is free forever with unlimited users, including password sharing, folders, groups, role-based access, browser extensions, a CLI, and an open API.

Source
Webpack: Is Webpack free?

Yes. Webpack is completely free and open source. It is maintained by the OpenJS Foundation and funded through sponsorships and donations.

Source
Passbolt: What does the Pro Edition cost and add?

Pro Edition costs $4.90 per user per month billed annually, with a 10-user minimum, and adds LDAP/AD provisioning, single sign-on, account recovery escrow, activity audit logs, and next-business-day support.

Source
Webpack: What can Webpack bundle?

Webpack can bundle JavaScript modules along with static assets including PNG, CSS, JPG, SASS, HBS files, and more, creating single or multiple chunks for browser usage.

Source
Passbolt: What license is Passbolt distributed under?

All Passbolt editions, including Pro and Enterprise, are distributed under the AGPL v3 open-source license.

Source
Webpack: Does Webpack require configuration?

Webpack supports both zero-config and custom configuration approaches. For simple projects, no configuration is needed, but complex builds benefit from webpack.config.js customization.

Source
Webpack: What is the 2026 roadmap for Webpack?

Webpack's 2026 roadmap includes native CSS module support, universal target compilation for multiple environments, lazy barrel optimization, and advancement toward version 6.

Source
Webpack: How does Webpack handle code splitting?

Webpack can create multiple chunks from a single entry point that are asynchronously loaded at runtime, reducing initial page load time by deferring non-critical code.

Source
Share

Related pages

Other head to heads