Developer Tools · head to head
ESLint vs Passbolt

Passbolt
Cybersecurity
Open-source password manager for teams with self-hosted or cloud deployment
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ESLint slow performance on large codebases compared to newer tools like Oxlint and Biome; Passbolt pro Edition requires a minimum of 10 users, making it costlier for very small teams.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ESLint and Passbolt actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ESLint
Nothing recorded that Passbolt does not also cover.
Only in Passbolt
- Password sharing and folders
- Groups and role-based access
- Browser extensions and CLI
- Open API
- LDAP provisioning and SSO
- Activity audit log
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ESLint
- Statically analysing JavaScript and JSX to find problems before runtimenot Passbolt
- Automatically fixing issues with syntax-aware rewritesnot Passbolt
- Enforcing a consistent code style across a teamnot Passbolt
- Running as a CI step to block non-conforming codenot Passbolt
- Writing custom rules for project-specific conventionsnot Passbolt
Passbolt
- Self-hosting a team password manager for data sovereigntynot ESLint
- Provisioning vault access from an existing LDAP/AD directorynot ESLint
- Sharing credentials across engineering or IT teams via folders and groupsnot ESLint
- Automating credential retrieval through the CLI or open APInot ESLint
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ESLint
- Slow performance on large codebases compared to newer tools like Oxlint and Biome
- Complexity in configuration from scratch, particularly for TypeScript support
- Limited built-in TypeScript support, requiring separate parsers and coordination with new TypeScript features
Passbolt
- Pro Edition requires a minimum of 10 users, making it costlier for very small teams.
- Community Edition lacks SSO and LDAP provisioning, which many organizations need for onboarding at scale.
- Self-hosting the Community Edition requires infrastructure and maintenance effort compared to fully managed competitors.
- Enterprise-tier support and HA consulting require custom, quote-based pricing rather than transparent rates.
Pricing, plan by plan
ESLint
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the ESLint review.
Passbolt
Free- Community EditionFree
- Unlimited users
- Password sharing and folders
- Role-based access control
- Pro Edition$4.9/month
- Minimum 10 users, billed annually
- LDAP/AD provisioning
- Single sign-on
- Enterprise Edition$undefined/month
- High availability and disaster recovery consulting
- White-glove migration
- Custom feature development
Which should you pick?
Choose ESLint if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Browser-based JavaScript, Node.js, Any JavaScript environment.
Choose Passbolt if
- You need password sharing and folders.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, windows, mac, linux, api.
- You also want groups and role-based access.
Questions people ask
- Is ESLint or Passbolt better?
- Neither clearly leads. ESLint starts at Free and Passbolt at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ESLint or Passbolt?
- ESLint starts at Free and Passbolt at Free.
- Does ESLint or Passbolt run on more platforms?
- ESLint runs on Browser-based JavaScript, Node.js, Any JavaScript environment. Passbolt runs on web, windows, mac, linux, api.
- Can I use ESLint for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is ESLint best used for?
- ESLint is most often used for statically analysing javascript and jsx to find problems before runtime, automatically fixing issues with syntax-aware rewrites, enforcing a consistent code style across a team, running as a ci step to block non-conforming code. Of those, statically analysing javascript and jsx to find problems before runtime and automatically fixing issues with syntax-aware rewrites are not what Passbolt is typically brought in for.
- What can ESLint do that Passbolt cannot?
- Passbolt covers Password sharing and folders, Groups and role-based access, Browser extensions and CLI, Open API.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ESLint: Does ESLint automatically fix code issues?
Many problems ESLint finds can be automatically fixed via the --fix flag. ESLint fixes are syntax-aware so you won't experience errors introduced by traditional find-and-replace algorithms.
SourcePassbolt: Is Passbolt free to use?
Yes. The Community Edition is free forever with unlimited users, including password sharing, folders, groups, role-based access, browser extensions, a CLI, and an open API.
SourceESLint: How much does ESLint cost?
ESLint is completely free and open-source software maintained by the OpenJS Foundation. The project accepts voluntary donations from sponsors.
SourcePassbolt: What does the Pro Edition cost and add?
Pro Edition costs $4.90 per user per month billed annually, with a 10-user minimum, and adds LDAP/AD provisioning, single sign-on, account recovery escrow, activity audit logs, and next-business-day support.
SourceESLint: Can I write custom ESLint rules?
Yes. You can develop custom rules that work alongside built-in functionality through ESLint's plugin system, allowing complete customization for your project needs.
SourcePassbolt: What license is Passbolt distributed under?
All Passbolt editions, including Pro and Enterprise, are distributed under the AGPL v3 open-source license.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- ESLint vs Turborepo
- ESLint vs Prettier
- ESLint vs Deno
- ESLint vs Fig
- ESLint vs Vite
- ESLint vs Harness
- ESLint vs Ansible
- ESLint vs Buildkite
- ESLint vs Argo CD
- ESLint vs GitLab CI/CD
- ESLint vs HCP Terraform
- ESLint vs Helm
- ESLint vs Earthly
- ESLint vs Eclipse IDE
- ESLint vs Moonrepo
- ESLint vs Nx Cloud
- ESLint vs Pants Build
- ESLint vs Bitwarden
- ESLint vs LastPass
- ESLint vs authentik
- ESLint vs 1Password
- ESLint vs Authelia
- ESLint vs Enpass
- ESLint vs HashiCorp Vault
- ESLint vs Infisical
- ESLint vs Norton 360
- ESLint vs Semgrep
- ESLint vs Trivy
- ESLint vs Chainguard
- ESLint vs Trulioo
- ESLint vs Unit21
- ESLint vs Veracode
- ESLint vs Very Good Security
- ESLint vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- ESLint vs Windscribe
- Passbolt vs Turborepo
- Passbolt vs Prettier
- Passbolt vs Deno
- Passbolt vs Fig
- Passbolt vs Vite
- Passbolt vs Harness
- Passbolt vs Ansible
- Passbolt vs Buildkite
- Passbolt vs Argo CD
- Passbolt vs GitLab CI/CD
- Passbolt vs HCP Terraform
- Passbolt vs Helm
- Passbolt vs Earthly
- Passbolt vs Eclipse IDE
- Passbolt vs Moonrepo
- Passbolt vs Nx Cloud
- Passbolt vs Pants Build
- Passbolt vs Bitwarden
- Passbolt vs LastPass
- Passbolt vs authentik
- Passbolt vs 1Password
- Passbolt vs Authelia
- Passbolt vs Enpass
- Passbolt vs HashiCorp Vault
- Passbolt vs Infisical
- Passbolt vs Norton 360
- Passbolt vs Semgrep
- Passbolt vs Trivy
- Passbolt vs Chainguard
- Passbolt vs Trulioo
- Passbolt vs Unit21
- Passbolt vs Veracode
- Passbolt vs Very Good Security
- Passbolt vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Passbolt vs Windscribe

