Cybersecurity · head to head
OWASP ZAP vs SentinelOne

OWASP ZAP
Cybersecurity
Free, open-source web application scanner and intercepting proxy, now governed by the Software Security Project.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

SentinelOne
Cybersecurity
Autonomous endpoint protection and response
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OWASP ZAP has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: OWASP ZAP authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.; SentinelOne enterprise pricing requires contacting sales
- They diverge on capability: OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy, SentinelOne covers AI-powered detection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OWASP ZAP and SentinelOne actually diverge.
| Attribute | OWASP ZAP | SentinelOne |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | free | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Desktop, Cli, Api | Windows, Macos, Linux, Ios, Android |
| Founded | 2001 | 2013 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OWASP ZAP
- Intercepting proxy
- Passive scanner
- Active scanner
- AJAX spider
- Automation Framework
- Headless daemon and REST API
- Docker images
- Add-on marketplace
Only in SentinelOne
- AI-powered detection
- Autonomous response
- Behavioral threat intelligence
- Root cause analysis
- Threat hunting automation
- Ransomware protection
- Container security
- Mobile endpoint protection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OWASP ZAP
- Adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handfulnot SentinelOne
- Manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per testernot SentinelOne
- Teaching developers what an attack against their own endpoint looks like, using a tool they can install themselvesnot SentinelOne
- Pre-release regression scanning of an internal application that would never justify a commercial DAST subscriptionnot SentinelOne
SentinelOne
- Endpoint detection and responsenot OWASP ZAP
- AI-powered threat huntingnot OWASP ZAP
- Cloud workload securitynot OWASP ZAP
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OWASP ZAP
- Authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
- There is no support contract in the product, so when a scan breaks the day before a release the escalation path is a GitHub issue and a community chat, which is not an answer that satisfies a delivery manager or an auditor who wants a named responsible party.
- Active scanning sends genuine attack traffic, so it can create records, trigger emails, exhaust rate limits or destabilise a fragile environment, and pointing it at production without prior agreement produces an incident rather than a test result.
- Output needs triage: passive rules generate large volumes of low-severity informational findings about headers and cookie flags that bury the few results that matter, and a team without someone tuning the rule set stops reading the report within a few sprints.
- As a dynamic scanner it can only test what it can reach, so authorisation flaws between accounts, business logic abuse and anything behind an undiscovered endpoint go unreported, and a passing ZAP scan is evidence of nothing more than the absence of the classes of bug it looks for.
SentinelOne
- Enterprise pricing requires contacting sales
- Prices shown for 5-100 workstations may differ for larger deployments
- Purchases must be made through authorized third-party partners
Pricing, plan by plan
OWASP ZAP
Free- Free & Open SourceFree
- Full functionality
- Active & passive scanning
- Spider
SentinelOne
On request- Singularity Complete$179.99/year
- Per endpoint pricing
- AI-driven endpoint and cloud workload protection
- Real-time threat detection and response
- Singularity Commercial$229.99/year
- Per endpoint pricing
- All Complete features plus Identity Detection and Response
- 90-day data retention
- Singularity Enterprise$null/custom
- Per endpoint pricing
- All Commercial features plus Agentic AI SOC Analyst
- Full Visibility and Forensics
Which should you pick?
Choose OWASP ZAP if
- You need intercepting proxy.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Cli, Api.
- You also want passive scanner.
Choose SentinelOne if
- You need ai-powered detection.
- You work on Windows, Macos, Linux, Ios, Android.
- You also want autonomous response.
Questions people ask
- Is OWASP ZAP or SentinelOne better?
- Neither clearly leads. OWASP ZAP starts at Free and SentinelOne at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OWASP ZAP or SentinelOne?
- OWASP ZAP has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for OWASP ZAP and On request for SentinelOne.
- Does OWASP ZAP or SentinelOne run on more platforms?
- OWASP ZAP runs on Desktop, Cli, Api. SentinelOne runs on Windows, Macos, Linux, Ios, Android.
- Can I use OWASP ZAP for free?
- Yes. OWASP ZAP has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. SentinelOne starts at On request.
- What is OWASP ZAP best used for?
- OWASP ZAP is most often used for adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handful, manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per tester, teaching developers what an attack against their own endpoint looks like, using a tool they can install themselves, pre-release regression scanning of an internal application that would never justify a commercial dast subscription. Of those, adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handful and manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per tester are not what SentinelOne is typically brought in for.
- What can OWASP ZAP do that SentinelOne cannot?
- OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy, Passive scanner, Active scanner, AJAX spider. SentinelOne covers AI-powered detection, Autonomous response, Behavioral threat intelligence, Root cause analysis.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OWASP ZAP: Is it still called OWASP ZAP?
The project left OWASP in August 2024 and is now governed by the Software Security Project, with core development sponsored by Checkmarx. The tool is now just ZAP, though most existing documentation, courses and search results still use the OWASP name.
SentinelOne: What is SentinelOne Singularity Complete pricing?
Singularity Complete costs $179.99 per endpoint per year and includes AI-driven endpoint and cloud workload protection, real-time threat detection and response, 14-day data retention, and AI Security Assistant. Pricing shown for 5-100 workstations.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Is it free for commercial use?
Yes. It is Apache 2.0 licensed, with no per-application, per-scan or per-user cost, and it can be used and modified commercially without a licence agreement.
SentinelOne: What features distinguish SentinelOne Commercial from Complete?
Singularity Commercial costs $229.99 per endpoint per year (versus $179.99 for Complete) and adds Identity Detection and Response, 90-day data retention (compared to 14-day), and Managed Threat Hunting services.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Can it replace a penetration test?
No. It automates checks for known vulnerability classes against endpoints it can reach. It does not reason about business logic, chain findings into an attack, or test authorisation between accounts, which is most of what a tester actually does.
SentinelOne: How does partner pricing affect SentinelOne costs?
All SentinelOne purchases are made through authorized third-party partners, and partner pricing may differ from published rates. Customers should verify pricing with their authorized reseller.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Does it run in CI?
Yes, through the official Docker images and the Automation Framework, which defines scan jobs in YAML so configuration lives in the repository. A baseline passive scan is the usual starting point because it is fast and non-intrusive.
SentinelOne: What does SentinelOne Enterprise include?
Singularity Enterprise (custom pricing, contact sales) adds Agentic AI SOC Analyst and Full Visibility and Forensics capabilities to all Commercial features, plus expert-led onboarding and training.
SourceOWASP ZAP: How does it compare to Burp Suite?
Burp Suite Professional is the more polished manual testing tool and has a stronger scanner and extension ecosystem, but it is licensed per tester and Burp Suite Enterprise per target. ZAP is the better fit where cost per target is the binding constraint; many teams use both.
Related pages
More on SentinelOne
Other head to heads
- OWASP ZAP vs 1Password
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitdefender Total Security
- OWASP ZAP vs Norton 360
- OWASP ZAP vs LastPass
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitwarden
- OWASP ZAP vs Burp Suite
- OWASP ZAP vs Metasploit
- OWASP ZAP vs Wireshark
- OWASP ZAP vs authentik
- OWASP ZAP vs Authelia
- OWASP ZAP vs Infisical
- OWASP ZAP vs Trivy
- OWASP ZAP vs Feedzai
- OWASP ZAP vs Frontegg
- OWASP ZAP vs HashiCorp Boundary
- OWASP ZAP vs JumpCloud
- OWASP ZAP vs McAfee Total Protection
- OWASP ZAP vs Darktrace
- OWASP ZAP vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- OWASP ZAP vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- OWASP ZAP vs VMware Carbon Black
- OWASP ZAP vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- OWASP ZAP vs Fortinet FortiGate
- OWASP ZAP vs Sophos Intercept X
- OWASP ZAP vs Trend Micro Vision One
- OWASP ZAP vs Enpass
- OWASP ZAP vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- OWASP ZAP vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- OWASP ZAP vs HID Global
- OWASP ZAP vs IBM QRadar
- SentinelOne vs 1Password
- SentinelOne vs Bitdefender Total Security
- SentinelOne vs Norton 360
- SentinelOne vs LastPass
- SentinelOne vs Bitwarden
- SentinelOne vs Burp Suite
- SentinelOne vs Metasploit
- SentinelOne vs Wireshark
- SentinelOne vs authentik
- SentinelOne vs Authelia
- SentinelOne vs Infisical
- SentinelOne vs Trivy
- SentinelOne vs Feedzai
- SentinelOne vs Frontegg
- SentinelOne vs HashiCorp Boundary
- SentinelOne vs JumpCloud
- SentinelOne vs McAfee Total Protection
- SentinelOne vs Darktrace
- SentinelOne vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- SentinelOne vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- SentinelOne vs VMware Carbon Black
- SentinelOne vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- SentinelOne vs Fortinet FortiGate
- SentinelOne vs Sophos Intercept X
- SentinelOne vs Trend Micro Vision One
- SentinelOne vs Enpass
- SentinelOne vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- SentinelOne vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- SentinelOne vs HID Global
- SentinelOne vs IBM QRadar
