Cybersecurity · head to head
Cybereason Defense Platform vs OWASP ZAP

Cybereason Defense Platform
Cybersecurity
AI-driven endpoint protection and detection
- From
- $50/year
- Rated
- -

OWASP ZAP
Cybersecurity
Free, open-source web application scanner and intercepting proxy, now governed by the Software Security Project.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OWASP ZAP has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Cybereason Defense Platform no published pricing on any platform tier: three plan levels (Enterprise, Enterprise Advanced, Enterprise Complete) feature-differentiated but cost-free; OWASP ZAP authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
- They diverge on capability: Cybereason Defense Platform covers Next-gen antivirus, OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cybereason Defense Platform and OWASP ZAP actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cybereason Defense Platform | OWASP ZAP |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $50/year | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | free |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, Macos, Linux, Mobile | Desktop, Cli, Api |
| Founded | 2012 | 2001 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cybereason Defense Platform
- Next-gen antivirus
- Endpoint detection and response
- Machine learning detection
- Behavioral analysis
- Threat hunting
- Automated remediation
- XDR integration
- Ransomware protection
Only in OWASP ZAP
- Intercepting proxy
- Passive scanner
- Active scanner
- AJAX spider
- Automation Framework
- Headless daemon and REST API
- Docker images
- Add-on marketplace
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cybereason Defense Platform
- Enterprise threat detection and response platformnot OWASP ZAP
- Managed detection and response (MDR) servicesnot OWASP ZAP
- Advanced cybersecurity for large organizationsnot OWASP ZAP
OWASP ZAP
- Adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handfulnot Cybereason Defense Platform
- Manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per testernot Cybereason Defense Platform
- Teaching developers what an attack against their own endpoint looks like, using a tool they can install themselvesnot Cybereason Defense Platform
- Pre-release regression scanning of an internal application that would never justify a commercial DAST subscriptionnot Cybereason Defense Platform
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cybereason Defense Platform
- No published pricing on any platform tier: three plan levels (Enterprise, Enterprise Advanced, Enterprise Complete) feature-differentiated but cost-free
- MDR services cost hidden: tiered MDR inclusion (Essentials, Essentials+XR, Complete) does not disclose pricing per tier
- Add-on pricing absent: incident response, DFIR, assessments, mobile defense, threat hunting marked as 'Add-On' with no pricing
- Sales-gated all pricing: no budget range or starting price available; customers must book demo or contact sales
OWASP ZAP
- Authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
- There is no support contract in the product, so when a scan breaks the day before a release the escalation path is a GitHub issue and a community chat, which is not an answer that satisfies a delivery manager or an auditor who wants a named responsible party.
- Active scanning sends genuine attack traffic, so it can create records, trigger emails, exhaust rate limits or destabilise a fragile environment, and pointing it at production without prior agreement produces an incident rather than a test result.
- Output needs triage: passive rules generate large volumes of low-severity informational findings about headers and cookie flags that bury the few results that matter, and a team without someone tuning the rule set stops reading the report within a few sprints.
- As a dynamic scanner it can only test what it can reach, so authorisation flaws between accounts, business logic abuse and anything behind an undiscovered endpoint go unreported, and a passing ZAP scan is evidence of nothing more than the absence of the classes of bug it looks for.
Pricing, plan by plan
Cybereason Defense Platform
$50/year- Cybereason NGAV$50/year
- Next-gen antivirus
- Machine learning detection
- Ransomware protection
- Cybereason EDR$85/year
- All NGAV features
- Endpoint detection
- Automated response
- Cybereason Complete$150/year
- All EDR features
- Managed detection
- 24/7 SOC support
OWASP ZAP
Free- Free & Open SourceFree
- Full functionality
- Active & passive scanning
- Spider
Which should you pick?
Choose Cybereason Defense Platform if
- You need next-gen antivirus.
- You work on Windows, Macos, Linux, Mobile.
- You also want endpoint detection and response.
Choose OWASP ZAP if
- You need intercepting proxy.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Cli, Api.
- You also want passive scanner.
Questions people ask
- Is Cybereason Defense Platform or OWASP ZAP better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cybereason Defense Platform starts at $50/year and OWASP ZAP at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cybereason Defense Platform or OWASP ZAP?
- OWASP ZAP has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $50/year for Cybereason Defense Platform and Free for OWASP ZAP.
- Does Cybereason Defense Platform or OWASP ZAP run on more platforms?
- Cybereason Defense Platform runs on Windows, Macos, Linux, Mobile. OWASP ZAP runs on Desktop, Cli, Api.
- Can I use OWASP ZAP for free?
- Yes. OWASP ZAP has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Cybereason Defense Platform starts at $50/year.
- What is Cybereason Defense Platform best used for?
- Cybereason Defense Platform is most often used for enterprise threat detection and response platform, managed detection and response (mdr) services, advanced cybersecurity for large organizations. Of those, enterprise threat detection and response platform and managed detection and response (mdr) services are not what OWASP ZAP is typically brought in for.
- What can Cybereason Defense Platform do that OWASP ZAP cannot?
- Cybereason Defense Platform covers Next-gen antivirus, Endpoint detection and response, Machine learning detection, Behavioral analysis. OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy, Passive scanner, Active scanner, AJAX spider.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cybereason Defense Platform: What are the Cybereason Enterprise pricing tiers?
Cybereason offers three tiers (Enterprise, Enterprise Advanced, Enterprise Complete) with different MDR service levels (MDR Essentials, MDR Essentials+XR, MDR Complete), but exact pricing is not published.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Is it still called OWASP ZAP?
The project left OWASP in August 2024 and is now governed by the Software Security Project, with core development sponsored by Checkmarx. The tool is now just ZAP, though most existing documentation, courses and search results still use the OWASP name.
Cybereason Defense Platform: How much do add-on services cost (incident response, DFIR, threat hunting)?
Add-on services (incident response, DFIR, security assessments, mobile defense, threat hunting) are available across all plans but marked as 'Add-On' with no published pricing.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Is it free for commercial use?
Yes. It is Apache 2.0 licensed, with no per-application, per-scan or per-user cost, and it can be used and modified commercially without a licence agreement.
Cybereason Defense Platform: How do I get pricing from Cybereason?
Click 'Book a Demo' or 'Talk to a Cybereason Defender' on the website. Cybereason sales will discuss pricing, platform fit, and custom solutions based on your organization's needs.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Can it replace a penetration test?
No. It automates checks for known vulnerability classes against endpoints it can reach. It does not reason about business logic, chain findings into an attack, or test authorisation between accounts, which is most of what a tester actually does.
OWASP ZAP: Does it run in CI?
Yes, through the official Docker images and the Automation Framework, which defines scan jobs in YAML so configuration lives in the repository. A baseline passive scan is the usual starting point because it is fast and non-intrusive.
OWASP ZAP: How does it compare to Burp Suite?
Burp Suite Professional is the more polished manual testing tool and has a stronger scanner and extension ecosystem, but it is licensed per tester and Burp Suite Enterprise per target. ZAP is the better fit where cost per target is the binding constraint; many teams use both.
Related pages
More on Cybereason Defense Platform
Other head to heads
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Norton 360
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs 1Password
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs LastPass
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs VMware Carbon Black
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Sophos Intercept X
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Darktrace
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Envysion
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Feedzai
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Frontegg
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Infisical
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs JumpCloud
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs SentinelOne
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Bitwarden
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Burp Suite
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Metasploit
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Wireshark
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs authentik
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Authelia
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Trivy
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs McAfee Total Protection
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitdefender Total Security
- OWASP ZAP vs Norton 360
- OWASP ZAP vs 1Password
- OWASP ZAP vs LastPass
- OWASP ZAP vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- OWASP ZAP vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- OWASP ZAP vs SentinelOne Singularity
- OWASP ZAP vs Trend Micro Vision One
- OWASP ZAP vs VMware Carbon Black
- OWASP ZAP vs Sophos Intercept X
- OWASP ZAP vs Darktrace
- OWASP ZAP vs Envysion
- OWASP ZAP vs Feedzai
- OWASP ZAP vs Frontegg
- OWASP ZAP vs HashiCorp Boundary
- OWASP ZAP vs Infisical
- OWASP ZAP vs JumpCloud
- OWASP ZAP vs SentinelOne
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitwarden
- OWASP ZAP vs Burp Suite
- OWASP ZAP vs Metasploit
- OWASP ZAP vs Wireshark
- OWASP ZAP vs authentik
- OWASP ZAP vs Authelia
- OWASP ZAP vs Trivy
- OWASP ZAP vs McAfee Total Protection
