Cybersecurity · head to head
Osano vs WorkOS

Osano
Cybersecurity
Consent management and data privacy platform with a published self-serve tier
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

WorkOS
Cybersecurity
Developer platform for enterprise-ready authentication and identity.
- From
- $125/one-time per connection
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Osano has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Osano the published visitor ceilings are low, with the paid self-serve tier stopping around 30,000 monthly visitors, so any consumer facing site with real traffic leaves published pricing immediately and negotiates a quote with no public anchor.; WorkOS authKit free tier limited to 1 million monthly active users; additional millions cost $2,500/month
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Osano and WorkOS actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Osano
- Consent banner
- Pre-consent tag blocking
- Consent record
- No fines guarantee
- Subject rights requests
- Data mapping
- Vendor privacy monitoring
- Cookie scanning
Only in WorkOS
Nothing recorded that Osano does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Osano
- A mid market company selling into the EU and California that needs one banner honouring different consent rules by visitor regionnot WorkOS
- A privacy counsel who wants a vendor that will contractually stand behind its consent product rather than disclaim all liabilitynot WorkOS
- A marketing team that needs Google Consent Mode signals wired correctly so analytics and ads degrade rather than break when consent is refusednot WorkOS
- A company with a handful of brand domains wanting one consent record and one scanning schedule across all of themnot WorkOS
WorkOS
- SaaS applications needing rapid enterprise SSO deploymentnot Osano
- Companies selling to mid-market and enterprise customersnot Osano
- Applications requiring SCIM directory sync with corporate identity systemsnot Osano
- Product teams needing audit logs for compliance (SOC 2, ISO 27001)not Osano
- Platforms with multiple identity provider requirementsnot Osano
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Osano
- The published visitor ceilings are low, with the paid self-serve tier stopping around 30,000 monthly visitors, so any consumer facing site with real traffic leaves published pricing immediately and negotiates a quote with no public anchor.
- The no fines guarantee is bounded and conditional on configuring the product as instructed, so it is a marketing differentiator with an indemnity cap rather than the insurance policy the name suggests, and the limits should be read before it influences a decision.
- Everything beyond consent, including subject rights automation, data mapping and vendor monitoring, is enterprise quoted, so the transparent pricing that attracts buyers covers only the cheapest part of the platform.
- Tag blocking depends on tags being loaded through the mechanisms Osano can intercept, and marketing teams that inject scripts directly into templates or through server side tagging routinely leak trackers past the banner without anyone noticing.
- It is a privacy platform rather than a security compliance one, so organisations that also need SOC 2 or ISO 27001 evidence collection run it alongside a separate tool and duplicate parts of the vendor and asset inventory.
WorkOS
- AuthKit free tier limited to 1 million monthly active users; additional millions cost $2,500/month
- Per-connection pricing for SSO and Directory Sync ($125–$50 each) scales poorly for enterprises with many identity providers
- Audit logs require separate subscription at $125/month per SIEM connection or $99/month per 1 million events
- Radar fraud protection billed separately at $100/month per 50,000 additional checks beyond 1,000 free checks
- Custom domain feature requires $99/month subscription
- Requires annual commitment for SLA and support guarantees; pay-as-you-go tier lacks uptime guarantee
Pricing, plan by plan
Osano
Free- FreeFree
- 1 user
- 1 domain
- 5,000 monthly visitors
- Plus$199/month
- 2 users
- 3 domains
- 30,000 monthly visitors
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Unlimited domains and higher visitor volumes
- Subject rights request automation
- Data mapping and assessments
WorkOS
$125/one-time per connection- Pay as You Go$undefined/variable
- Per-connection pricing from $125 to $50 with volume discounts
- Up to 60% discount at scale
- Quick deployment
- Annual Credits$undefined/variable
- Custom pricing with volume discounts
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- Guided migration
Which should you pick?
Choose Osano if
- You need consent banner.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want pre-consent tag blocking.
Questions people ask
- Is Osano or WorkOS better?
- Neither clearly leads. Osano starts at Free and WorkOS at $125/one-time per connection, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Osano or WorkOS?
- Osano has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Osano and $125/one-time per connection for WorkOS.
- Does Osano or WorkOS run on more platforms?
- Osano runs on Web. WorkOS runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Osano for free?
- Yes. Osano has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. WorkOS starts at $125/one-time per connection.
- What is Osano best used for?
- Osano is most often used for a mid market company selling into the eu and california that needs one banner honouring different consent rules by visitor region, a privacy counsel who wants a vendor that will contractually stand behind its consent product rather than disclaim all liability, a marketing team that needs google consent mode signals wired correctly so analytics and ads degrade rather than break when consent is refused, a company with a handful of brand domains wanting one consent record and one scanning schedule across all of them. Of those, a mid market company selling into the eu and california that needs one banner honouring different consent rules by visitor region and a privacy counsel who wants a vendor that will contractually stand behind its consent product rather than disclaim all liability are not what WorkOS is typically brought in for.
- What can Osano do that WorkOS cannot?
- Osano covers Consent banner, Pre-consent tag blocking, Consent record, No fines guarantee.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Osano: Does the free tier include the no fines guarantee?
No. The guarantee attaches to paid use of the consent product, and the free tier is capped at one domain and 5,000 monthly visitors.
WorkOS: How quickly can I implement WorkOS SSO?
Developers can implement single sign-on in minutes instead of months. Multiple customers report setting up SSO in less than a week, with WorkOS handling the complexity of SAML and OIDC protocols.
SourceOsano: How is Osano priced?
By monthly website visitors, number of domains and tier. The self-serve path stops at a low visitor ceiling and everything above is quoted.
WorkOS: What SDKs does WorkOS provide?
WorkOS offers SDKs for Node.js, Python, Ruby, Go, PHP, Java, and .NET.
SourceOsano: Can it handle US state privacy laws as well as GDPR?
Yes, with region aware rule sets covering GDPR, ePrivacy and the US state regimes, so an EU visitor sees an opt-in banner and a US visitor sees the applicable opt-out.
WorkOS: Does WorkOS support SCIM provisioning?
Yes. WorkOS supports SCIM provisioning integration with systems like Okta and Entra ID for automated user management.
SourceOsano: Does Osano do subject access requests?
Yes, but in the enterprise tier rather than the published plans, and it is quoted separately from consent.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Osano vs TrustArc
- Osano vs Transcend
- Osano vs Termly
- Osano vs OneTrust
- Osano vs DataGrail
- Osano vs Avast One
- Osano vs CyberGhost VPN
- Osano vs ProtonVPN
- Osano vs Securiti
- Osano vs Surfshark
- Osano vs BigID
- Osano vs Mullvad VPN
- Osano vs Speakeasy
- Osano vs Sysdig
- Osano vs Tenable
- Osano vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Osano vs TunnelBear
- Osano vs Vanta
- Osano vs 1Password
- Osano vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Osano vs Norton 360
- Osano vs LastPass
- Osano vs JumpCloud
- Osano vs Logto
- Osano vs Authelia
- Osano vs Authy
- Osano vs Clerk
- Osano vs LogicManager
- Osano vs Doppler
- Osano vs Malwarebytes
- Osano vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Osano vs Netwrix
- Osano vs NordVPN
- Osano vs Microsoft Intune
- WorkOS vs TrustArc
- WorkOS vs Transcend
- WorkOS vs Termly
- WorkOS vs OneTrust
- WorkOS vs DataGrail
- WorkOS vs Avast One
- WorkOS vs CyberGhost VPN
- WorkOS vs ProtonVPN
- WorkOS vs Securiti
- WorkOS vs Surfshark
- WorkOS vs BigID
- WorkOS vs Mullvad VPN
- WorkOS vs Speakeasy
- WorkOS vs Sysdig
- WorkOS vs Tenable
- WorkOS vs Trend Micro Vision One
- WorkOS vs TunnelBear
- WorkOS vs Vanta
- WorkOS vs 1Password
- WorkOS vs Bitdefender Total Security
- WorkOS vs Norton 360
- WorkOS vs LastPass
- WorkOS vs JumpCloud
- WorkOS vs Logto
- WorkOS vs Authelia
- WorkOS vs Authy
- WorkOS vs Clerk
- WorkOS vs LogicManager
- WorkOS vs Doppler
- WorkOS vs Malwarebytes
- WorkOS vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- WorkOS vs Netwrix
- WorkOS vs NordVPN
- WorkOS vs Microsoft Intune
