Cybersecurity · head to head
Clerk vs Osano

Clerk
Cybersecurity
Drop-in user authentication and management for developers
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Osano
Cybersecurity
Consent management and data privacy platform with a published self-serve tier
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Clerk pricing scales with monthly retained users, which can grow expensive quickly for consumer apps with large user bases.; Osano the published visitor ceilings are low, with the paid self-serve tier stopping around 30,000 monthly visitors, so any consumer facing site with real traffic leaves published pricing immediately and negotiates a quote with no public anchor.
- They diverge on capability: Clerk covers Prebuilt UI components, Osano covers Consent banner.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Clerk and Osano actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Clerk
- Prebuilt UI components
- Organization management
- Multi-factor authentication
- Social sign-on
- Billing
- Enterprise connections
Only in Osano
- Consent banner
- Pre-consent tag blocking
- Consent record
- No fines guarantee
- Subject rights requests
- Data mapping
- Vendor privacy monitoring
- Cookie scanning
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Clerk
- Adding sign-in and user profiles to a web or mobile app quicklynot Osano
- B2B SaaS apps needing organizations and role-based accessnot Osano
- Startups wanting prebuilt UI instead of building auth in-housenot Osano
- Apps needing MFA and fraud detection out of the boxnot Osano
Osano
- A mid market company selling into the EU and California that needs one banner honouring different consent rules by visitor regionnot Clerk
- A privacy counsel who wants a vendor that will contractually stand behind its consent product rather than disclaim all liabilitynot Clerk
- A marketing team that needs Google Consent Mode signals wired correctly so analytics and ads degrade rather than break when consent is refusednot Clerk
- A company with a handful of brand domains wanting one consent record and one scanning schedule across all of themnot Clerk
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Clerk
- Pricing scales with monthly retained users, which can grow expensive quickly for consumer apps with large user bases.
- Enterprise SSO connections beyond the first are billed as add-ons, adding cost for larger organizations.
- The Business tier's extra dashboard seats cost $20/month each, which adds up for larger teams.
- Enterprise-tier features like the 99.99% uptime SLA require annual contracts rather than flexible monthly billing.
Osano
- The published visitor ceilings are low, with the paid self-serve tier stopping around 30,000 monthly visitors, so any consumer facing site with real traffic leaves published pricing immediately and negotiates a quote with no public anchor.
- The no fines guarantee is bounded and conditional on configuring the product as instructed, so it is a marketing differentiator with an indemnity cap rather than the insurance policy the name suggests, and the limits should be read before it influences a decision.
- Everything beyond consent, including subject rights automation, data mapping and vendor monitoring, is enterprise quoted, so the transparent pricing that attracts buyers covers only the cheapest part of the platform.
- Tag blocking depends on tags being loaded through the mechanisms Osano can intercept, and marketing teams that inject scripts directly into templates or through server side tagging routinely leak trackers past the banner without anyone noticing.
- It is a privacy platform rather than a security compliance one, so organisations that also need SOC 2 or ISO 27001 evidence collection run it alongside a separate tool and duplicate parts of the vendor and asset inventory.
Pricing, plan by plan
Clerk
Free- HobbyFree
- 50,000 MRU limit per app
- Up to 3 dashboard seats
- Unlimited applications
- Pro$25/month
- 50,000 MRUs included, $0.02/MRU overage
- Up to 3 dashboard seats
- 1 Enterprise Connection included
- Business$300/month
- 50,000 MRUs included with volume pricing
- 10 dashboard seats included
- SOC2 report and priority support
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Custom pricing, annual billing
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- HIPAA available, dedicated Slack channel
Osano
Free- FreeFree
- 1 user
- 1 domain
- 5,000 monthly visitors
- Plus$199/month
- 2 users
- 3 domains
- 30,000 monthly visitors
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Unlimited domains and higher visitor volumes
- Subject rights request automation
- Data mapping and assessments
Which should you pick?
Choose Clerk if
- You need prebuilt ui components.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, ios, android, api.
- You also want organization management.
Choose Osano if
- You need consent banner.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want pre-consent tag blocking.
Questions people ask
- Is Clerk or Osano better?
- Neither clearly leads. Clerk starts at Free and Osano at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Clerk or Osano?
- Clerk starts at Free and Osano at Free.
- Does Clerk or Osano run on more platforms?
- Clerk runs on web, ios, android, api. Osano runs on Web.
- Can I use Clerk for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Clerk best used for?
- Clerk is most often used for adding sign-in and user profiles to a web or mobile app quickly, b2b saas apps needing organizations and role-based access, startups wanting prebuilt ui instead of building auth in-house, apps needing mfa and fraud detection out of the box. Of those, adding sign-in and user profiles to a web or mobile app quickly and b2b saas apps needing organizations and role-based access are not what Osano is typically brought in for.
- What can Clerk do that Osano cannot?
- Clerk covers Prebuilt UI components, Organization management, Multi-factor authentication, Social sign-on. Osano covers Consent banner, Pre-consent tag blocking, Consent record, No fines guarantee.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Clerk: What does Clerk cost?
Clerk's Hobby plan is free with a 50,000 MRU limit; Pro is $25/month ($20/month billed annually), Business is $300/month ($250 annually), and Enterprise uses custom annual pricing.
SourceOsano: Does the free tier include the no fines guarantee?
No. The guarantee attaches to paid use of the consent product, and the free tier is capped at one domain and 5,000 monthly visitors.
Clerk: Is there a free plan and what are its limits?
Yes, the Hobby plan is free with a 50,000 monthly retained user (MRU) limit per app, up to 3 dashboard seats, and unlimited applications, with no credit card required.
SourceOsano: How is Osano priced?
By monthly website visitors, number of domains and tier. The self-serve path stops at a low visitor ceiling and everything above is quoted.
Clerk: How is usage metered?
Clerk meters by monthly retained users (MRUs) — users who return to the app at least a day after signing up — with overage billed at $0.02 per MRU beyond the included 50,000 on paid plans.
SourceOsano: Can it handle US state privacy laws as well as GDPR?
Yes, with region aware rule sets covering GDPR, ePrivacy and the US state regimes, so an EU visitor sees an opt-in banner and a US visitor sees the applicable opt-out.
Osano: Does Osano do subject access requests?
Yes, but in the enterprise tier rather than the published plans, and it is quoted separately from consent.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Clerk vs Frontegg
- Clerk vs Ory
- Clerk vs Logto
- Clerk vs authentik
- Clerk vs 1Password
- Clerk vs Authelia
- Clerk vs Beyond Identity
- Clerk vs HID Global
- Clerk vs LastPass
- Clerk vs Snyk
- Clerk vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Clerk vs Socure
- Clerk vs SonicWall
- Clerk vs Sophos Intercept X
- Clerk vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Clerk vs Sticky Password
- Clerk vs Stytch
- Clerk vs Ory Kratos
- Clerk vs TrustArc
- Clerk vs Transcend
- Clerk vs Termly
- Clerk vs OneTrust
- Clerk vs DataGrail
- Clerk vs Avast One
- Clerk vs CyberGhost VPN
- Clerk vs ProtonVPN
- Clerk vs Securiti
- Clerk vs Surfshark
- Clerk vs BigID
- Clerk vs Mullvad VPN
- Clerk vs Speakeasy
- Clerk vs Sysdig
- Clerk vs Tenable
- Clerk vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Clerk vs TunnelBear
- Clerk vs Vanta
- Osano vs Frontegg
- Osano vs Ory
- Osano vs Logto
- Osano vs authentik
- Osano vs 1Password
- Osano vs Authelia
- Osano vs Beyond Identity
- Osano vs HID Global
- Osano vs LastPass
- Osano vs Snyk
- Osano vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Osano vs Socure
- Osano vs SonicWall
- Osano vs Sophos Intercept X
- Osano vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Osano vs Sticky Password
- Osano vs Stytch
- Osano vs Ory Kratos
- Osano vs TrustArc
- Osano vs Transcend
- Osano vs Termly
- Osano vs OneTrust
- Osano vs DataGrail
- Osano vs Avast One
- Osano vs CyberGhost VPN
- Osano vs ProtonVPN
- Osano vs Securiti
- Osano vs Surfshark
- Osano vs BigID
- Osano vs Mullvad VPN
- Osano vs Speakeasy
- Osano vs Sysdig
- Osano vs Tenable
- Osano vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Osano vs TunnelBear
- Osano vs Vanta
