Cybersecurity · head to head
Osano vs PublicInput

Osano
Cybersecurity
Consent management and data privacy platform with a published self-serve tier
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Osano has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Osano the published visitor ceilings are low, with the paid self-serve tier stopping around 30,000 monthly visitors, so any consumer facing site with real traffic leaves published pricing immediately and negotiates a quote with no public anchor.; PublicInput all three plans, Listen, Engage and Engage Plus, are listed as Request Pricing with no published rate, minimum or cost driver
- They diverge on capability: Osano covers Consent banner, PublicInput covers Virtual Public Meetings.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Osano and PublicInput actually diverge.
| Attribute | Osano | PublicInput |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $400/month |
| Pricing model | Per month by monthly website visitors | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Ios, Android |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Government |
| Founded | Unknown | 2014 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Osano
- Consent banner
- Pre-consent tag blocking
- Consent record
- No fines guarantee
- Subject rights requests
- Data mapping
- Vendor privacy monitoring
- Cookie scanning
Only in PublicInput
- Virtual Public Meetings
- Online Surveys
- Comment Management
- Multi-language Support
- Engagement Analytics
- Zoom
- Microsoft Teams
- GovDelivery
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Osano
- A mid market company selling into the EU and California that needs one banner honouring different consent rules by visitor regionnot PublicInput
- A privacy counsel who wants a vendor that will contractually stand behind its consent product rather than disclaim all liabilitynot PublicInput
- A marketing team that needs Google Consent Mode signals wired correctly so analytics and ads degrade rather than break when consent is refusednot PublicInput
- A company with a handful of brand domains wanting one consent record and one scanning schedule across all of themnot PublicInput
PublicInput
- Civic engagementnot Osano
- Government consultationnot Osano
- Public input collectionnot Osano
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Osano
- The published visitor ceilings are low, with the paid self-serve tier stopping around 30,000 monthly visitors, so any consumer facing site with real traffic leaves published pricing immediately and negotiates a quote with no public anchor.
- The no fines guarantee is bounded and conditional on configuring the product as instructed, so it is a marketing differentiator with an indemnity cap rather than the insurance policy the name suggests, and the limits should be read before it influences a decision.
- Everything beyond consent, including subject rights automation, data mapping and vendor monitoring, is enterprise quoted, so the transparent pricing that attracts buyers covers only the cheapest part of the platform.
- Tag blocking depends on tags being loaded through the mechanisms Osano can intercept, and marketing teams that inject scripts directly into templates or through server side tagging routinely leak trackers past the banner without anyone noticing.
- It is a privacy platform rather than a security compliance one, so organisations that also need SOC 2 or ISO 27001 evidence collection run it alongside a separate tool and duplicate parts of the vendor and asset inventory.
PublicInput
- All three plans, Listen, Engage and Engage Plus, are listed as Request Pricing with no published rate, minimum or cost driver
- HTML and CSS customization, custom workflows and approvals, and external system integration with Accela and ESRI are listed as Enterprise Capabilities rather than core platform features
- Public meetings functionality is sold under a separate Meetings plan rather than being included with the Engagement plans
- Getting a plan requires booking a consultation and a tailored demo rather than self serve signup
Pricing, plan by plan
Osano
Free- FreeFree
- 1 user
- 1 domain
- 5,000 monthly visitors
- Plus$199/month
- 2 users
- 3 domains
- 30,000 monthly visitors
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Unlimited domains and higher visitor volumes
- Subject rights request automation
- Data mapping and assessments
PublicInput
$400/month- Enterprise$400/month
- Virtual Meetings
- Surveys
- Comment Management
Which should you pick?
Choose Osano if
- You need consent banner.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want pre-consent tag blocking.
Choose PublicInput if
- You need virtual public meetings.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want online surveys.
Questions people ask
- Is Osano or PublicInput better?
- Neither clearly leads. Osano starts at Free and PublicInput at $400/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Osano or PublicInput?
- Osano has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Osano and $400/month for PublicInput.
- Does Osano or PublicInput run on more platforms?
- Osano runs on Web. PublicInput runs on Web, Ios, Android.
- Can I use Osano for free?
- Yes. Osano has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. PublicInput starts at $400/month.
- What is Osano best used for?
- Osano is most often used for a mid market company selling into the eu and california that needs one banner honouring different consent rules by visitor region, a privacy counsel who wants a vendor that will contractually stand behind its consent product rather than disclaim all liability, a marketing team that needs google consent mode signals wired correctly so analytics and ads degrade rather than break when consent is refused, a company with a handful of brand domains wanting one consent record and one scanning schedule across all of them. Of those, a mid market company selling into the eu and california that needs one banner honouring different consent rules by visitor region and a privacy counsel who wants a vendor that will contractually stand behind its consent product rather than disclaim all liability are not what PublicInput is typically brought in for.
- What can Osano do that PublicInput cannot?
- Osano covers Consent banner, Pre-consent tag blocking, Consent record, No fines guarantee. PublicInput covers Virtual Public Meetings, Online Surveys, Comment Management, Multi-language Support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Osano: Does the free tier include the no fines guarantee?
No. The guarantee attaches to paid use of the consent product, and the free tier is capped at one domain and 5,000 monthly visitors.
PublicInput: How much does PublicInput cost?
PublicInput does not publish pricing on their website. Customers must request a demo or book a meeting to receive a quote based on their specific needs.
SourceOsano: How is Osano priced?
By monthly website visitors, number of domains and tier. The self-serve path stops at a low visitor ceiling and everything above is quoted.
PublicInput: What pricing plans does PublicInput offer?
PublicInput offers Engagement Plans and Meetings Plans, but specific pricing for each plan is not publicly available and requires contacting their sales team.
SourceOsano: Can it handle US state privacy laws as well as GDPR?
Yes, with region aware rule sets covering GDPR, ePrivacy and the US state regimes, so an EU visitor sees an opt-in banner and a US visitor sees the applicable opt-out.
Osano: Does Osano do subject access requests?
Yes, but in the enterprise tier rather than the published plans, and it is quoted separately from consent.
Related pages
More on PublicInput
Other head to heads
- Osano vs TrustArc
- Osano vs Transcend
- Osano vs Termly
- Osano vs OneTrust
- Osano vs DataGrail
- Osano vs Avast One
- Osano vs CyberGhost VPN
- Osano vs ProtonVPN
- Osano vs Securiti
- Osano vs Surfshark
- Osano vs BigID
- Osano vs Mullvad VPN
- Osano vs Speakeasy
- Osano vs Sysdig
- Osano vs Tenable
- Osano vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Osano vs TunnelBear
- Osano vs Vanta
- Osano vs Polco
- Osano vs Zencity
- Osano vs Accela
- Osano vs CivicPlus
- Osano vs Granicus
- Osano vs DocuWare
- Osano vs Nextdoor for Government
- Osano vs CityView
- Osano vs CentralSquare
- Osano vs RecDesk
- Osano vs CitizenLab
- Osano vs OpenCities
- Osano vs Oracle Government Cloud
- Osano vs Palantir Gotham
- Osano vs Periscope Holdings
- Osano vs Ring Neighbors
- Osano vs Bang the Table
- PublicInput vs TrustArc
- PublicInput vs Transcend
- PublicInput vs Termly
- PublicInput vs OneTrust
- PublicInput vs DataGrail
- PublicInput vs Avast One
- PublicInput vs CyberGhost VPN
- PublicInput vs ProtonVPN
- PublicInput vs Securiti
- PublicInput vs Surfshark
- PublicInput vs BigID
- PublicInput vs Mullvad VPN
- PublicInput vs Speakeasy
- PublicInput vs Sysdig
- PublicInput vs Tenable
- PublicInput vs Trend Micro Vision One
- PublicInput vs TunnelBear
- PublicInput vs Vanta
- PublicInput vs Polco
- PublicInput vs Zencity
- PublicInput vs Accela
- PublicInput vs CivicPlus
- PublicInput vs Granicus
- PublicInput vs DocuWare
- PublicInput vs Nextdoor for Government
- PublicInput vs CityView
- PublicInput vs CentralSquare
- PublicInput vs RecDesk
- PublicInput vs CitizenLab
- PublicInput vs OpenCities
- PublicInput vs Oracle Government Cloud
- PublicInput vs Palantir Gotham
- PublicInput vs Periscope Holdings
- PublicInput vs Ring Neighbors
- PublicInput vs Bang the Table

