Networking · head to head
Auvik vs OPNsense

Auvik
Networking
Cloud-based network monitoring and management priced by managed device count, quote-only
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

OPNsense
Networking
FreeBSD-based firewall and routing platform with weekly updates and a full configuration API
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OPNsense has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Auvik no pricing is published anywhere on the site; every number requires submitting a lead form and speaking to sales, which slows down basic vendor comparison; OPNsense throughput depends entirely on hardware you selected yourself, and intrusion prevention at multi-gigabit rates will saturate a machine that handled plain firewalling fine, with no vendor sizing commitment to fall back on.
- They diverge on capability: Auvik covers Automated network mapping, OPNsense covers Stateful firewall on pf.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Auvik and OPNsense actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Networking).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Auvik
- Automated network mapping
- Configuration backup
- Multi-tenant MSP view
- Traffic insight
- Device-based billing with exclusions
Only in OPNsense
- Stateful firewall on pf
- VPN suite
- Suricata IDS and IPS
- Full configuration API
- High availability
- Weekly update cadence
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Auvik
- An MSP wanting a single SaaS platform to monitor and map multiple client networks with per-client segregationnot OPNsense
- An internal IT team wanting automatic, versioned configuration backup for switches and routers without managing that infrastructure themselvesnot OPNsense
- A network team wanting continuous, automatically updated network topology mapping rather than maintaining diagrams manuallynot OPNsense
- An organisation wanting traffic visibility by application without deploying a separate flow collectornot OPNsense
OPNsense
- Replacing a small business firewall appliance whose renewal quote exceeded the cost of the hardwarenot Auvik
- Branch offices where the firewall configuration must be produced by Ansible rather than by handnot Auvik
- Sites that need WireGuard and intrusion prevention on the same box without separate feature licencesnot Auvik
- A homelab or lab network needing VLAN routing, multi-WAN and DNS filtering on one machinenot Auvik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Auvik
- No pricing is published anywhere on the site; every number requires submitting a lead form and speaking to sales, which slows down basic vendor comparison
- Billing by managed device count means the total cost is not knowable in advance without first running an accurate device count against Auvik's specific inclusion and exclusion rules
- As a SaaS-only product with no on-premises option, an organisation loses monitoring visibility if its own internet connection to Auvik's cloud goes down at the same time as the incident it needs to diagnose
- MSP-focused multi-tenant packaging may include features an internal IT team monitoring only its own network does not need, while still pricing against that broader feature set
- Configuration backup and restore depend on Auvik correctly supporting the specific hardware models on a given network; less common vendors may have thinner support
- Volume discounts exist but are also not published, so an MSP scaling client count has no way to model margin impact before negotiating each contract renewal
OPNsense
- Throughput depends entirely on hardware you selected yourself, and intrusion prevention at multi-gigabit rates will saturate a machine that handled plain firewalling fine, with no vendor sizing commitment to fall back on.
- The weekly update cadence is good for security but means more change events than a team used to annual appliance firmware, and occasional regressions reach production installations.
- FreeBSD underneath limits driver support compared with Linux, so recent network cards and some virtualisation drivers can be unsupported or slow.
- The plugin ecosystem is uneven in quality; some plugins are maintained by a single contributor and can lag a major release, breaking a function you depended on.
- Community support is a forum, so an outage at two in the morning on the free edition is your problem alone unless you bought the business subscription in advance.
Pricing, plan by plan
Auvik
On request- Auvik$undefined/month
- Automated network mapping
- Configuration backup
- MSP multi-tenant packages available
OPNsense
Free- OPNsense Community EditionFree
- MIT licence with no feature restrictions
- All VPN, IDS and HA features included
- Weekly updates and two major releases a year
- OPNsense Business Edition$undefined/year
- Stabilised update track lagging community releases
- Commercial support from Deciso
- Additional enterprise plugins and configuration backup
Which should you pick?
Choose OPNsense if
- You need stateful firewall on pf.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on x86-64 appliances, Virtual machines, Deciso hardware.
- You also want vpn suite.
Questions people ask
- Is Auvik or OPNsense better?
- Neither clearly leads. Auvik starts at On request and OPNsense at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Auvik or OPNsense?
- OPNsense has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Auvik and Free for OPNsense.
- Does Auvik or OPNsense run on more platforms?
- Auvik runs on Web. OPNsense runs on x86-64 appliances, Virtual machines, Deciso hardware.
- Can I use OPNsense for free?
- Yes. OPNsense has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Auvik starts at On request.
- What is Auvik best used for?
- Auvik is most often used for an msp wanting a single saas platform to monitor and map multiple client networks with per-client segregation, an internal it team wanting automatic, versioned configuration backup for switches and routers without managing that infrastructure themselves, a network team wanting continuous, automatically updated network topology mapping rather than maintaining diagrams manually, an organisation wanting traffic visibility by application without deploying a separate flow collector. Of those, an msp wanting a single saas platform to monitor and map multiple client networks with per-client segregation and an internal it team wanting automatic, versioned configuration backup for switches and routers without managing that infrastructure themselves are not what OPNsense is typically brought in for.
- What can Auvik do that OPNsense cannot?
- Auvik covers Automated network mapping, Configuration backup, Multi-tenant MSP view, Traffic insight. OPNsense covers Stateful firewall on pf, VPN suite, Suricata IDS and IPS, Full configuration API.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Auvik: Is Auvik priced per network or per device?
Per device, according to Auvik's own FAQ; some device categories like access points and printers are monitored at no additional charge.
OPNsense: How is it different from pfSense?
It is a 2015 fork with an MIT licence, a fixed weekly release cadence, a complete configuration API and a different interface. Feature coverage is comparable; the release process and API are the real differences.
Auvik: Is there any published price?
No, all pricing is quote-only through a sales conversation.
OPNsense: Do I need the Business Edition?
Only if you want commercial support or a slower, stabilised update stream. No features are withheld from the community edition.
Auvik: Does Auvik require an on-premises server?
No, it is SaaS-delivered with a lightweight local collector rather than a full on-premises monitoring server.
OPNsense: Can it handle a gigabit internet connection?
Plain firewalling on modest current hardware, comfortably. With Suricata inspection enabled, expect to need a considerably stronger CPU.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Auvik vs Domotz
- Auvik vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Auvik vs LibreNMS
- Auvik vs Kentik
- Auvik vs Zabbix
- Auvik vs ThousandEyes
- Auvik vs Icinga
- Auvik vs OpenVPN
- Auvik vs Consul
- Auvik vs Tailscale
- Auvik vs Cisco Meraki
- Auvik vs HiveMQ
- Auvik vs Traefik
- Auvik vs ZeroTier
- Auvik vs Juniper Mist
- Auvik vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- Auvik vs Nebula
- Auvik vs ngrok
- Auvik vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Auvik vs pfSense
- Auvik vs Catchpoint
- Auvik vs Headscale
- OPNsense vs Domotz
- OPNsense vs PRTG Network Monitor
- OPNsense vs LibreNMS
- OPNsense vs Kentik
- OPNsense vs Zabbix
- OPNsense vs ThousandEyes
- OPNsense vs Icinga
- OPNsense vs OpenVPN
- OPNsense vs Consul
- OPNsense vs Tailscale
- OPNsense vs Cisco Meraki
- OPNsense vs HiveMQ
- OPNsense vs Traefik
- OPNsense vs ZeroTier
- OPNsense vs Juniper Mist
- OPNsense vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- OPNsense vs Nebula
- OPNsense vs ngrok
- OPNsense vs MikroTik RouterOS
- OPNsense vs pfSense
- OPNsense vs Catchpoint
- OPNsense vs Headscale
