Healthcare · head to head
Omada Health vs PathAI

PathAI
Healthcare
Digital pathology image management with an FDA cleared platform for primary diagnosis
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Omada Health no direct-pay pricing disclosed; programs only available through employer or health plan coverage; PathAI aISight is labelled research use only and cannot be used for primary diagnosis; only AISight Dx carries the FDA clearance and CE-IVD mark, and laboratories regularly buy the wrong configuration and discover they cannot sign out on it.
- They diverge on capability: Omada Health covers Chronic Disease Management, PathAI covers AISight image management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Omada Health and PathAI actually diverge.
| Attribute | Omada Health | PathAI |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, Mobile | Web |
| Founded | 2011 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Omada Health
- Chronic Disease Management
- Behavioral Health
- Coaching
- Mobile App
- Analytics
- Incentives
- Health Plans
- EHR Systems
Only in PathAI
- AISight image management
- AISight Dx
- Scanner interoperability
- Case and worklist management
- AI algorithm deployment
- Biopharmaceutical research tooling
- LIS integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Omada Health
- Employer-sponsored diabetes prevention and weight health programmesnot PathAI
- Remote monitoring of hypertension and diabetes with connected devicesnot PathAI
- GLP-1 support programmes alongside medicationnot PathAI
- Musculoskeletal care delivered virtuallynot PathAI
PathAI
- An academic medical centre going digital for primary diagnosis that needs the FDA cleared AISight Dx configuration rather than the research labelled versionnot Omada Health
- A reference laboratory consolidating subspecialty sign out across sites so a specialist pathologist can read cases from any locationnot Omada Health
- A pharmaceutical company needing consistent quantitative scoring of trial biopsies across many sites and readersnot Omada Health
- A laboratory with a mixed scanner estate that needs one image management layer rather than each scanner vendor viewernot Omada Health
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Omada Health
- No direct-pay pricing disclosed; programs only available through employer or health plan coverage
- Eligibility varies by employer and health plan
- Government payer programs (Medicare/Medicaid) have different device access rules
- MSK program may require out-of-pocket costs depending on individual health plans
PathAI
- AISight is labelled research use only and cannot be used for primary diagnosis; only AISight Dx carries the FDA clearance and CE-IVD mark, and laboratories regularly buy the wrong configuration and discover they cannot sign out on it.
- The software licence is usually the smallest line in a digital pathology project, behind scanners, storage and network capacity, so a business case built around the software cost understates the real investment by a wide margin.
- Whole slide images are very large, so a laboratory that does not model storage growth and retention policy from the start faces storage costs that grow faster than case volume and dominate the renewal.
- Clinical validation is required per subspecialty rather than once for the platform, which means dermatopathology, gastrointestinal and breast each need their own concordance study and pathologist time before go live.
- PathAI competes against pathology incumbents that also sell the scanners, and a laboratory buying an independent image management layer takes on the integration risk between scanner vendor and software vendor itself.
Pricing, plan by plan
Omada Health
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Omada Health review.
PathAI
On request- AISight$undefined/year
- Priced by annual slide or case volume and by pathologist seats
- AISight Dx, the clinically cleared configuration, quoted separately from research use AISight
- Image storage priced by capacity and retention policy
Which should you pick?
Choose Omada Health if
- You need chronic disease management.
- You work on Web, Mobile.
- You also want behavioral health.
Questions people ask
- Is Omada Health or PathAI better?
- Neither clearly leads. Omada Health starts at On request and PathAI at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Omada Health or PathAI?
- Omada Health starts at On request and PathAI at On request.
- Does Omada Health or PathAI run on more platforms?
- Omada Health runs on Web, Mobile. PathAI runs on Web.
- What is Omada Health best used for?
- Omada Health is most often used for employer-sponsored diabetes prevention and weight health programmes, remote monitoring of hypertension and diabetes with connected devices, glp-1 support programmes alongside medication, musculoskeletal care delivered virtually. Of those, employer-sponsored diabetes prevention and weight health programmes and remote monitoring of hypertension and diabetes with connected devices are not what PathAI is typically brought in for.
- What can Omada Health do that PathAI cannot?
- Omada Health covers Chronic Disease Management, Behavioral Health, Coaching, Mobile App. PathAI covers AISight image management, AISight Dx, Scanner interoperability, Case and worklist management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Omada Health: How much does Omada Health cost?
Omada Health programs are offered at no cost to members when covered by an employer or health plan. Direct-pay pricing for uninsured individuals is not disclosed on the website.
SourcePathAI: What is the difference between AISight and AISight Dx?
AISight is for research use only and not for clinical diagnostic use. AISight Dx received FDA 510(k) clearance in June 2025 for primary diagnosis and is CE-IVD marked in the EEA, UK and Switzerland. Only the Dx configuration can be used to sign out cases.
Omada Health: Is Omada Health free?
Omada's Prevention, Diabetes, and Hypertension programs are free when covered by your employer or health plan. The Joint and Muscle Health program is subject to deductibles, copays, and co-insurance as determined under your health plan.
SourcePathAI: Can we use our existing scanners?
Yes. AISight is designed to ingest images from multiple whole slide scanner vendors, which is one of the main reasons laboratories choose an independent image management layer.
Omada Health: Do I need to pay for the Omada welcome kit with smart devices?
The welcome kit containing smart devices is offered at no cost to covered members. Continuous glucose monitors for diabetes program participants are also provided at no additional charge, though Medicare and Medicaid are excluded.
SourcePathAI: Do the AI algorithms carry the same clearance as the platform?
No. The platform clearance covers image management for primary diagnosis. Individual algorithms have their own labelling, and many are research use only. Check each one separately.
PathAI: Is pricing published?
No. It is quoted by slide or case volume, pathologist seats and storage, with the clinically cleared configuration priced separately.
Related pages
More on Omada Health
Other head to heads
- Omada Health vs Epic Systems
- Omada Health vs Cerner
- Omada Health vs Athenahealth
- Omada Health vs Amwell
- Omada Health vs Hinge Health
- Omada Health vs Headspace
- Omada Health vs Ginger
- Omada Health vs Sectra
- Omada Health vs Calm
- Omada Health vs Teladoc Health
- Omada Health vs Koa Health
- Omada Health vs SilverCloud by Amwell
- Omada Health vs Visage Imaging
- Omada Health vs WebPT
- Omada Health vs Allscripts
- Omada Health vs Clue
- Omada Health vs Dentrix
- Omada Health vs Techcyte
- Omada Health vs Ambra Health
- Omada Health vs Paige
- Omada Health vs Sysmex
- Omada Health vs Lunit
- Omada Health vs Aidoc
- Omada Health vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Omada Health vs Therapixel
- Omada Health vs Gleamer
- Omada Health vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Omada Health vs Annalise.ai
- Omada Health vs Quantum Health
- Omada Health vs TherapyNotes
- Omada Health vs Zocdoc
- Omada Health vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- PathAI vs Epic Systems
- PathAI vs Cerner
- PathAI vs Athenahealth
- PathAI vs Amwell
- PathAI vs Hinge Health
- PathAI vs Headspace
- PathAI vs Ginger
- PathAI vs Sectra
- PathAI vs Calm
- PathAI vs Teladoc Health
- PathAI vs Koa Health
- PathAI vs SilverCloud by Amwell
- PathAI vs Visage Imaging
- PathAI vs WebPT
- PathAI vs Allscripts
- PathAI vs Clue
- PathAI vs Dentrix
- PathAI vs Techcyte
- PathAI vs Ambra Health
- PathAI vs Paige
- PathAI vs Sysmex
- PathAI vs Lunit
- PathAI vs Aidoc
- PathAI vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- PathAI vs Therapixel
- PathAI vs Gleamer
- PathAI vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- PathAI vs Annalise.ai
- PathAI vs Quantum Health
- PathAI vs TherapyNotes
- PathAI vs Zocdoc
- PathAI vs Allscripts Professional EHR

