Technology · head to head
Okta vs Ping Identity

Ping Identity
Cybersecurity
Enterprise identity for workforce and customers, with a 5,000 user floor
- From
- $3/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Okta has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Okta requires $1,500 annual minimum contract; Ping Identity workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate.
- They diverge on capability: Okta covers Single sign-on (SSO), Ping Identity covers Single sign-on.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Okta and Ping Identity actually diverge.
| Attribute | Okta | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $3/month |
| Pricing model | Unknown | Per user per month |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, SaaS | Web, Linux, Windows |
| Category | Technology | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 2009 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Okta
- Single sign-on (SSO)
- Multi-factor authentication
- Lifecycle management
- Universal directory
- B2B integration
- Passwordless authentication
- Microsoft 365
- Google Workspace
Only in Ping Identity
- Single sign-on
- Identity orchestration
- Directory services
- Flexible deployment
- ForgeRock capabilities
Both cover
- API access management
- Adaptive MFA
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Okta
- Employee SSOnot Ping Identity
- Customer identitynot Ping Identity
- B2B integrationnot Ping Identity
- Zero Trust securitynot Ping Identity
- Compliancenot Ping Identity
Ping Identity
- A bank that must keep identity data on premises in one country while running SaaS identity elsewherenot Okta
- An airline or telco with tens of millions of customer identities needing a directory that holds that scalenot Okta
- An enterprise assembling authentication journeys that call several external verification and risk vendorsnot Okta
- An existing ForgeRock customer deciding what its upgrade path looks like under Ping ownershipnot Okta
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Okta
- Requires $1,500 annual minimum contract
- Admin-only MFA can be vulnerable to push notification fatigue attacks
- Implementation requires significant services and integration fees in year one
Ping Identity
- Workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate.
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication is in the Plus tier only, doubling the per user price for a capability many buyers assume is standard in a modern identity platform.
- ForgeRock no longer exists as an independent product, so customers who chose it specifically to avoid Ping now face a roadmap set by the vendor they did not pick.
- Thoma Bravo ownership across both merged companies means the commercial priority is margin, and buyers report firmer renewal negotiations than they saw before 2022.
- The portfolio has overlapping components from three product lineages, so scoping a deployment requires vendor architects and the licensing conversation is more complicated than the price list implies.
Pricing, plan by plan
Okta
Free- Starter Suite$6/user/month
- SSO
- MFA
- Universal Directory
- Core Essentials Suite$14/user/month
- Adaptive MFA
- Privileged Access
- Lifecycle Management
- Essentials Suite$17/user/month
- Same as Core Essentials
- Most popular
- Professional Suite$undefined/custom
- Device Access
- Identity Security Posture
- Threat Protection
Ping Identity
$3/month- PingOne for Workforce Essential$3/month
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Single sign-on and directory services
- OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, SAML and SCIM
- PingOne for Workforce Plus$6/month
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication
- PingOne for Customers Essential$35000/year
- Flat annual fee
- No-code identity orchestration
- Unified customer profiles
- PingOne for Customers Plus$50000/year
- Flat annual fee
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive MFA and device management
Which should you pick?
Choose Okta if
- You need single sign-on (sso).
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, SaaS.
- You also want multi-factor authentication.
Choose Ping Identity if
- You need single sign-on.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows.
- You also want identity orchestration.
Questions people ask
- Is Okta or Ping Identity better?
- Neither clearly leads. Okta starts at Free and Ping Identity at $3/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Okta or Ping Identity?
- Okta has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Okta and $3/month for Ping Identity.
- Does Okta or Ping Identity run on more platforms?
- Okta runs on Web, SaaS. Ping Identity runs on Web, Linux, Windows.
- Can I use Okta for free?
- Yes. Okta has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Ping Identity starts at $3/month.
- What is Okta best used for?
- Okta is most often used for employee sso, customer identity, b2b integration, zero trust security. Of those, employee sso and customer identity are not what Ping Identity is typically brought in for.
- What can Okta do that Ping Identity cannot?
- Okta covers Single sign-on (SSO), Multi-factor authentication, Lifecycle management, Universal directory. Ping Identity covers Single sign-on, Identity orchestration, Directory services, Flexible deployment. Both handle API access management, Adaptive MFA.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Okta: What is the minimum contract for Okta Workforce Identity?
Okta requires a $1,500 annual minimum contract for Workforce Identity plans. Pricing starts at $6 per user per month (Starter) and ranges to $17 per user per month (Essentials), billed annually.
SourcePing Identity: Can I still buy ForgeRock?
Not as a separate product. Ping acquired ForgeRock in 2023 and the capabilities are sold within the Ping portfolio. Existing customers should ask about the specific migration path for their components.
Okta: Does Okta offer a free trial?
Yes, Okta provides a 30-day free trial so customers can explore all product capabilities before committing to a paid plan.
SourcePing Identity: What is the real minimum spend?
PingOne for Workforce Essential is 3 USD per user per month with a 5,000 user annual minimum, so roughly 180,000 USD a year before anything else.
Okta: How many pre-built integrations does Okta support?
Okta offers over 7,000 pre-built integrations with popular enterprise applications including Salesforce, Slack, Workday, Box, Confluence, and Zendesk.
SourcePing Identity: Is MFA included?
Basic authentication policies are in Essential. Adaptive MFA and passwordless require the Plus tier at 6 USD per user per month.
Okta: What security features does Okta provide for admins?
Okta provides multi-factor authentication, adaptive MFA, single logout, and identity threat detection and response. However, only 94% of Okta customers have MFA enabled for administrators.
SourceOkta: Can Okta integrate with on-premises directories?
Yes, Okta's Universal Directory and lifecycle management support cloud and on-premises identity sources, including Active Directory and LDAP.
SourceRelated pages
More on Ping Identity
Other head to heads
- Okta vs Dashlane
- Okta vs Aha!
- Okta vs Eclipse
- Okta vs Datadog
- Okta vs Greenhouse
- Okta vs GitLab
- Okta vs Postgres
- Okta vs RescueTime
- Okta vs Asana
- Okta vs Amplitude
- Okta vs Intercom
- Okta vs LaunchDarkly
- Okta vs Finxact
- Okta vs GitHub
- Okta vs Heap
- Okta vs Microsoft Edge
- Okta vs Netlify
- Okta vs Productboard
- Okta vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Okta vs Frontegg
- Okta vs Speakeasy
- Okta vs Akeyless
- Okta vs authentik
- Okta vs Logto
- Okta vs Authelia
- Okta vs Transmit Security
- Okta vs Delinea
- Okta vs Genetec Security Center
- Okta vs VMware Carbon Black
- Okta vs Rhombus Systems
- Okta vs Yoti
- Okta vs Avast One
- Okta vs Chainguard
- Okta vs Cosign
- Okta vs CyberGhost VPN
- Ping Identity vs Dashlane
- Ping Identity vs Aha!
- Ping Identity vs Eclipse
- Ping Identity vs Datadog
- Ping Identity vs Greenhouse
- Ping Identity vs GitLab
- Ping Identity vs Postgres
- Ping Identity vs RescueTime
- Ping Identity vs Asana
- Ping Identity vs Amplitude
- Ping Identity vs Intercom
- Ping Identity vs LaunchDarkly
- Ping Identity vs Finxact
- Ping Identity vs GitHub
- Ping Identity vs Heap
- Ping Identity vs Microsoft Edge
- Ping Identity vs Netlify
- Ping Identity vs Productboard
- Ping Identity vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Ping Identity vs Frontegg
- Ping Identity vs Speakeasy
- Ping Identity vs Akeyless
- Ping Identity vs authentik
- Ping Identity vs Logto
- Ping Identity vs Authelia
- Ping Identity vs Transmit Security
- Ping Identity vs Delinea
- Ping Identity vs Genetec Security Center
- Ping Identity vs VMware Carbon Black
- Ping Identity vs Rhombus Systems
- Ping Identity vs Yoti
- Ping Identity vs Avast One
- Ping Identity vs Chainguard
- Ping Identity vs Cosign
- Ping Identity vs CyberGhost VPN

