Databases · head to head
Ninox vs Restate

Restate
Developer Tools
Durable execution engine in Rust with a free tier and low-latency workflows
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Free plans on both; paid from €25/mo and $300/mo.
- Where Ninox falls short: free plan limited to 5 users and 5,000 records.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Ninox and Restate actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Ninox
Nothing recorded that Restate does not also cover.
Only in Restate
- Durable execution
- Virtual objects
- Single binary runtime
- Multi-language SDKs
- Workflows and sagas
- Restate Cloud
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Ninox
- No-code database solutions for small to medium teamsnot Restate
- Workflow automation and process managementnot Restate
- Customer data and project tracking with custom viewsnot Restate
Restate
- Payment or order flows where a crash between two external API calls must not double-charge or lose the ordernot Ninox
- AI agent loops that call tools over minutes or hours and must survive a deployment mid-runnot Ninox
- Replacing hand-rolled retry, idempotency key and outbox code across a set of microservicesnot Ninox
- A small team that wants durable workflows without operating a Temporal cluster and its databasenot Ninox
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Ninox
- Free plan limited to 5 users and 5,000 records
- API call limits restrict automation on lower tiers (1,000/month free, 10,000/month team)
- Only 7-day history on free plan vs. unlimited on Business
Restate
- The runtime is under a Business Source Licence rather than an open source licence, so building a competing managed offering on it is prohibited and some procurement functions will reject it on licence grounds alone
- Restate Cloud jumps from a free fifty thousand actions straight to 300 US dollars a month for twenty million, so a workload sitting at a few hundred thousand actions pays enterprise-shaped money for hobby-shaped volume
- It is a young project against Temporal’s established base, so hiring engineers who already know it is unrealistic and the answer to most questions is in the docs rather than on Stack Overflow
- The programming model requires structuring code around durable handlers and virtual objects, which is a genuine rewrite for existing services rather than a library you add
- The single-binary simplicity that makes small deployments cheap also means fewer operational knobs at very large scale than a system designed as separable components
Pricing, plan by plan
Ninox
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 5 users
- 100 MB storage
- Up to 5,000 records
- Team€25/mo
- 5 GB storage per user
- 50,000 records per user
- 10,000 API calls per user per month
- Business€40/mo
- 10 GB storage per user
- 250,000 records per user
- 50,000 API calls per user per month
- EnterpriseOn request
- Custom pricing available
- Dedicated support
- Custom solutions and governance
Restate
Free- FreeFree
- Fifty thousand durable actions per month
- No credit card required
- Community support
- Starter$300/mo
- Twenty million actions per month
- Two hundred actions per second, bursting to one thousand
- Twenty GB storage
- Pro$1,000/mo
- Fifty million actions per month
- Five hundred actions per second, bursting to two thousand
- Fifty GB storage
- EnterpriseOn request
- Negotiated volume
- Twenty-four seven P0 support
- 99.99 per cent SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose Restate if
- You need durable execution.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Web.
- You also want virtual objects.
Questions people ask
- Is Ninox or Restate better?
- Neither clearly leads. Ninox starts at Free and Restate at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Ninox or Restate?
- Ninox starts at Free and Restate at Free.
- Does Ninox or Restate run on more platforms?
- Ninox runs on Web. Restate runs on Linux, macOS, Web.
- Can I use Ninox for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Ninox best used for?
- Ninox is most often used for no-code database solutions for small to medium teams, workflow automation and process management, customer data and project tracking with custom views. Of those, no-code database solutions for small to medium teams and workflow automation and process management are not what Restate is typically brought in for.
- What can Ninox do that Restate cannot?
- Restate covers Durable execution, Virtual objects, Single binary runtime, Multi-language SDKs.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Ninox: How much does Ninox cost?
Ninox is free for individuals with up to 5 users. Team plan is 25 EUR per user per month (billed annually), and Business plan is 40 EUR per user per month (billed annually). Enterprise plans have custom pricing.
SourceRestate: Is Restate open source?
The SDKs are MIT. The runtime is under a Business Source Licence, which permits self-hosting but not offering it as a competing service.
Ninox: Is Ninox free?
Yes, Ninox offers a free plan for up to 5 users with 100 MB storage and 5,000 records. No payment required to start, and includes all core views: table, form, chart, kanban, maps, and calendar.
SourceRestate: How does it compare with Temporal?
Same problem, different shape: one Rust binary with embedded storage instead of a server plus database plus workers, and lower per-step latency.
Ninox: What is Ninox Team plan pricing?
The Team plan costs 25 EUR per user per month (billed annually). It includes 5 GB storage per user, 50,000 records, 10,000 API calls per month per user, and 30-day history. Annual billing is required.
SourceRestate: Is there a free tier?
Yes, fifty thousand durable actions a month on Restate Cloud with no card required.
Restate: Which languages are supported?
TypeScript, Java, Kotlin, Go, Python and Rust.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Ninox vs Airtable
- Ninox vs Apache Airflow
- Ninox vs Knack
- Ninox vs FaunaDB
- Ninox vs Readyset
- Ninox vs Cockroach Labs
- Ninox vs PostgreSQL
- Ninox vs RabbitMQ
- Ninox vs Amazon Aurora
- Ninox vs ClickHouse
- Ninox vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Ninox vs Memcached
- Ninox vs MotherDuck
- Ninox vs Neo4j
- Ninox vs OpenSearch
- Ninox vs Cassandra
- Ninox vs Firestore
- Ninox vs Apache Kafka
- Ninox vs Helix
- Ninox vs Rust
- Ninox vs Atlantis
- Ninox vs Jitsu
- Ninox vs Envoy
- Ninox vs Okteto
- Ninox vs Argo CD
- Ninox vs Steampipe
- Ninox vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Ninox vs Deno
- Ninox vs GitHub Desktop
- Ninox vs Istio
- Ninox vs Penpot
- Ninox vs PyCharm
- Ninox vs Sublime Text
- Ninox vs Vite
- Ninox vs Bazel
- Ninox vs Daytona
- Restate vs Airtable
- Restate vs Apache Airflow
- Restate vs Knack
- Restate vs FaunaDB
- Restate vs Readyset
- Restate vs Cockroach Labs
- Restate vs PostgreSQL
- Restate vs RabbitMQ
- Restate vs Amazon Aurora
- Restate vs ClickHouse
- Restate vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Restate vs Memcached
- Restate vs MotherDuck
- Restate vs Neo4j
- Restate vs OpenSearch
- Restate vs Cassandra
- Restate vs Firestore
- Restate vs Apache Kafka
- Restate vs Helix
- Restate vs Rust
- Restate vs Atlantis
- Restate vs Jitsu
- Restate vs Envoy
- Restate vs Okteto
- Restate vs Argo CD
- Restate vs Steampipe
- Restate vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Restate vs Deno
- Restate vs GitHub Desktop
- Restate vs Istio
- Restate vs Penpot
- Restate vs PyCharm
- Restate vs Sublime Text
- Restate vs Vite
- Restate vs Bazel
- Restate vs Daytona

