File Storage · head to head
Backblaze vs Nasuni

Backblaze
File Storage
Unlimited cloud backup at an affordable price
- From
- $9/month
- Rated
- -

Nasuni
File Storage
Cloud file storage that keeps the authoritative copy in object storage and caches it at each site
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Backblaze personal Backup is $99 a year billed annually, with no monthly option; Nasuni subscription is based on managed capacity, so cold data that would cost almost nothing in an archive tier keeps paying the full platform rate, and there is limited incentive structure to delete.
- They diverge on capability: Backblaze covers Unlimited backup, Nasuni covers Edge caching appliances.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Backblaze and Nasuni actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (File Storage).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Backblaze
- Unlimited backup
- Continuous backup
- Version history
- Private encryption key
- Restore by mail
- Mobile apps
- macOS
- Windows
Only in Nasuni
- Edge caching appliances
- Object storage back end
- Continuous versioning
- Global file lock
- Rapid site recovery
- Ransomware detection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Backblaze
- Unlimited backup of a personal computer and external drivesnot Nasuni
- Restoring files from anywhere through the webnot Nasuni
- Mailed hard drive restore for large recoveriesnot Nasuni
- Private encryption key control for sensitive datanot Nasuni
Nasuni
- Consolidating file servers across many branch offices onto one namespace without shipping data between sitesnot Backblaze
- Replacing a NAS plus backup plus offsite replication stack with a single recovery modelnot Backblaze
- Engineering or media teams in different regions who need to work on the same large project filesnot Backblaze
- An organisation that has been hit by ransomware on file shares and needs version level rollback rather than tape restoresnot Backblaze
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Backblaze
- Personal Backup is $99 a year billed annually, with no monthly option
- Web restores are capped at 500GB per request
- Forever version history is a Business tier add-on rather than included
- Administrative controls and SSO are Business features
- Backs up user data from a computer and attached drives, so NAS and server backup are not covered by the personal plan
Nasuni
- Subscription is based on managed capacity, so cold data that would cost almost nothing in an archive tier keeps paying the full platform rate, and there is limited incentive structure to delete.
- Every site needs an appliance, virtual or physical, which is a footprint and a patching obligation at locations that previously had only a file server or nothing.
- A read that misses the local cache is fetched from object storage, so the first access to a cold large file is at cloud latency and users experience it as the system being slow at random.
- Global file lock serialises access across regions, so genuinely collaborative editing of the same large files still involves waiting for another site to release the lock rather than merging.
- The object storage underneath is your contract, so API transaction and egress charges from Azure or AWS land on your cloud bill and are not covered by the Nasuni subscription you were quoted against.
Pricing, plan by plan
Backblaze
$9/month- Personal Backup$9/month
- Unlimited storage for single computer
- Unlimited version history
- 30-day trial
- B2 Cloud Storage$6/TB/month
- S3-compatible storage
- Pay-as-you-go model
Nasuni
On request- Nasuni File Data Platform$undefined/year
- Subscription based on managed capacity
- Edge appliances at each site
- Continuous versioning and rapid recovery
Which should you pick?
Choose Backblaze if
- You need unlimited backup.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Web.
- You also want continuous backup.
Choose Nasuni if
- You need edge caching appliances.
- You work on Web, Windows, VMware, Hyper-V, AWS, Azure.
- You also want object storage back end.
Questions people ask
- Is Backblaze or Nasuni better?
- Neither clearly leads. Backblaze starts at $9/month and Nasuni at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Backblaze or Nasuni?
- Backblaze starts at $9/month and Nasuni at On request.
- Does Backblaze or Nasuni run on more platforms?
- Backblaze runs on Windows, macOS, Web. Nasuni runs on Web, Windows, VMware, Hyper-V, AWS, Azure.
- What is Backblaze best used for?
- Backblaze is most often used for unlimited backup of a personal computer and external drives, restoring files from anywhere through the web, mailed hard drive restore for large recoveries, private encryption key control for sensitive data. Of those, unlimited backup of a personal computer and external drives and restoring files from anywhere through the web are not what Nasuni is typically brought in for.
- What can Backblaze do that Nasuni cannot?
- Backblaze covers Unlimited backup, Continuous backup, Version history, Private encryption key. Nasuni covers Edge caching appliances, Object storage back end, Continuous versioning, Global file lock.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Backblaze: What is the pricing for Backblaze Personal Backup?
Backblaze Personal Backup costs $9/month on monthly billing or $8.25/month when billed annually, providing unlimited storage for a single computer.
SourceNasuni: Do I still need a backup product?
That is the pitch: continuous versioning in object storage replaces the backup schedule for file data. Databases and virtual machines still need their own tooling.
Backblaze: What storage options does Backblaze B2 offer?
Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage is priced at $6/TB per month with a pay-as-you-go model, and is S3 compatible for flexible cloud storage.
SourceNasuni: Who owns the storage account?
You do. Nasuni writes into object storage you contract for, which also means the cloud provider bills you directly for it.
Backblaze: Does Backblaze support Linux systems?
No. Backblaze does not support Linux operating systems, limiting it to Windows, macOS, and web access only.
SourceNasuni: How fast is recovery of a whole site?
An appliance can be serving files within hours because data is pulled on demand, but performance stays degraded while the cache refills.
Nasuni: Is pricing published?
No. Nasuni sells through quotes based on managed capacity and site count, so comparisons need a real proposal rather than a list price.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Backblaze vs Carbonite
- Backblaze vs IDrive
- Backblaze vs Arq Backup
- Backblaze vs CrashPlan
- Backblaze vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Backblaze vs Sync.com
- Backblaze vs Barracuda Backup
- Backblaze vs Ceph
- Backblaze vs MinIO
- Backblaze vs Cloudflare R2
- Backblaze vs TrueNAS
- Backblaze vs Box
- Backblaze vs LucidLink
- Backblaze vs Panzura
- Backblaze vs pCloud
- Backblaze vs Scality RING
- Backblaze vs Storj
- Backblaze vs IDrive e2
- Backblaze vs Nextcloud
- Backblaze vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Backblaze vs Zerto
- Backblaze vs VAST Data
- Backblaze vs Tigris
- Backblaze vs Tresorit
- Nasuni vs Carbonite
- Nasuni vs IDrive
- Nasuni vs Arq Backup
- Nasuni vs CrashPlan
- Nasuni vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Nasuni vs Sync.com
- Nasuni vs Barracuda Backup
- Nasuni vs Ceph
- Nasuni vs MinIO
- Nasuni vs Cloudflare R2
- Nasuni vs TrueNAS
- Nasuni vs Box
- Nasuni vs LucidLink
- Nasuni vs Panzura
- Nasuni vs pCloud
- Nasuni vs Scality RING
- Nasuni vs Storj
- Nasuni vs IDrive e2
- Nasuni vs Nextcloud
- Nasuni vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Nasuni vs Zerto
- Nasuni vs VAST Data
- Nasuni vs Tigris
- Nasuni vs Tresorit
