File Storage · head to head
LucidLink vs Zerto

LucidLink
File Storage
Cloud filesystem that streams large media files on demand instead of syncing them
- From
- $7/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: LucidLink additional storage at $7 to $8 per 100GB per month is roughly three to four times raw S3 pricing, so teams with large cold archives pay a heavy premium for data they rarely touch.; Zerto zerto with Azure is listed on UK G-Cloud as a reseller-managed disaster recovery service, not Zerto's own licence pricing, with OS management from £75 per host per month for the public sector
- They diverge on capability: LucidLink covers Filespaces, Zerto covers Continuous data protection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which LucidLink and Zerto actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (File Storage).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in LucidLink
- Filespaces
- On-demand streaming
- Client-side encryption
- Customer-managed keys
- Bring your own storage
- Snapshots
Only in Zerto
- Continuous data protection
- Journal-based recovery
- Automated failover
- Non-disruptive testing
- Multi-cloud mobility
- Long-term retention
- VMware
- Hyper-V
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
LucidLink
- A post house with editors in three countries cutting from one shared 4K rush library without shipping drivesnot Zerto
- A broadcaster giving freelancers access to a project for a fortnight without provisioning VPN and a NAS mountnot Zerto
- A game studio sharing multi-gigabyte asset builds where syncing every file to every workstation is impracticalnot Zerto
- An architecture practice opening large point cloud and BIM files from a laptop on a hotel connectionnot Zerto
Zerto
- Data protectionnot LucidLink
- Disaster recoverynot LucidLink
- Business continuitynot LucidLink
- Ransomware protectionnot LucidLink
- Compliancenot LucidLink
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
LucidLink
- Additional storage at $7 to $8 per 100GB per month is roughly three to four times raw S3 pricing, so teams with large cold archives pay a heavy premium for data they rarely touch.
- Included storage is pooled per member, so adding a seat is also how you buy capacity, and teams with a few heavy users and many light ones buy seats purely for the gigabytes.
- Performance is bounded by the network link and local cache size, so a workstation with a small cache on a poor connection performs far worse than the demonstrations suggest.
- Small-file and metadata-heavy workloads such as code repositories, node modules trees or build outputs perform badly, so it is not a general-purpose file server replacement.
- Customer-managed keys and bring your own storage are Enterprise-tier options, so organisations that cannot let a vendor hold their keys cannot use the published pricing at all.
Zerto
- Zerto with Azure is listed on UK G-Cloud as a reseller-managed disaster recovery service, not Zerto's own licence pricing, with OS management from £75 per host per month for the public sector
Pricing, plan by plan
LucidLink
$7/month- Starter$7/month
- 100GB included per member, pooled across the team
- Additional storage $7 per 100GB per month
- Client-side encryption
- Business$32/month
- $27 per member per month billed annually
- 400GB included per member, pooled across the team
- Additional storage $8 per 100GB per month
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom pricing and storage terms
- Customer-managed encryption keys
- Bring your own object storage bucket
Zerto
$5/month- Zerto Enterprise Cloud$5/month
- Continuous protection
- Journal-based recovery
- Multi-cloud mobility
Which should you pick?
Choose LucidLink if
- You need filespaces.
- You work on macOS, Windows, Linux, iOS.
- You also want on-demand streaming.
Choose Zerto if
- You need continuous data protection.
- You work on Windows, Linux, Web.
- You also want journal-based recovery.
Questions people ask
- Is LucidLink or Zerto better?
- Neither clearly leads. LucidLink starts at $7/month and Zerto at $5/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, LucidLink or Zerto?
- LucidLink starts at $7/month and Zerto at $5/month.
- Does LucidLink or Zerto run on more platforms?
- LucidLink runs on macOS, Windows, Linux, iOS. Zerto runs on Windows, Linux, Web.
- What is LucidLink best used for?
- LucidLink is most often used for a post house with editors in three countries cutting from one shared 4k rush library without shipping drives, a broadcaster giving freelancers access to a project for a fortnight without provisioning vpn and a nas mount, a game studio sharing multi-gigabyte asset builds where syncing every file to every workstation is impractical, an architecture practice opening large point cloud and bim files from a laptop on a hotel connection. Of those, a post house with editors in three countries cutting from one shared 4k rush library without shipping drives and a broadcaster giving freelancers access to a project for a fortnight without provisioning vpn and a nas mount are not what Zerto is typically brought in for.
- What can LucidLink do that Zerto cannot?
- LucidLink covers Filespaces, On-demand streaming, Client-side encryption, Customer-managed keys. Zerto covers Continuous data protection, Journal-based recovery, Automated failover, Non-disruptive testing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
LucidLink: What does storage actually cost?
$7 per 100GB per month on Starter and $8 per 100GB per month on Business, above the pooled allowance. Model this separately from the seat cost.
Zerto: Can I try Zerto before buying?
Yes, Zerto offers a 14-day free trial or on-demand lab access to test the platform.
SourceLucidLink: Can we hold our own encryption keys?
On the Enterprise tier, yes, along with pointing the filespace at your own S3 or Azure bucket. Not on Starter or Business.
LucidLink: Does it work for source code?
Not well. It is built for large sequential reads. Many small files is the workload it handles worst.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- LucidLink vs Nasuni
- LucidLink vs Panzura
- LucidLink vs Ceph
- LucidLink vs TrueNAS
- LucidLink vs Google Drive
- LucidLink vs Nextcloud
- LucidLink vs Cloudflare R2
- LucidLink vs Duplicati
- LucidLink vs Cloudian
- LucidLink vs Scality RING
- LucidLink vs Tigris
- LucidLink vs Tresorit
- LucidLink vs IDrive
- LucidLink vs Microsoft OneDrive
- LucidLink vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- LucidLink vs Carbonite
- LucidLink vs Barracuda Backup
- LucidLink vs Backblaze
- LucidLink vs Veritas NetBackup
- LucidLink vs CrashPlan
- LucidLink vs pCloud
- LucidLink vs Storj
- LucidLink vs IDrive e2
- Zerto vs Nasuni
- Zerto vs Panzura
- Zerto vs Ceph
- Zerto vs TrueNAS
- Zerto vs Google Drive
- Zerto vs Nextcloud
- Zerto vs Cloudflare R2
- Zerto vs Duplicati
- Zerto vs Cloudian
- Zerto vs Scality RING
- Zerto vs Tigris
- Zerto vs Tresorit
- Zerto vs IDrive
- Zerto vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Zerto vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Zerto vs Carbonite
- Zerto vs Barracuda Backup
- Zerto vs Backblaze
- Zerto vs Veritas NetBackup
- Zerto vs CrashPlan
- Zerto vs pCloud
- Zerto vs Storj
- Zerto vs IDrive e2

