File Storage · head to head
VAST Data vs Zerto

VAST Data
File Storage
All-flash storage designed to make hard disk tiers unnecessary
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: VAST Data data reduction ratios drive the economics, and datasets that are already compressed, such as media or encrypted files, reduce poorly and destroy the cost per terabyte case.; Zerto zerto with Azure is listed on UK G-Cloud as a reseller-managed disaster recovery service, not Zerto's own licence pricing, with OS management from £75 per host per month for the public sector
- They diverge on capability: VAST Data covers Disaggregated architecture, Zerto covers Continuous data protection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which VAST Data and Zerto actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (File Storage).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in VAST Data
- Disaggregated architecture
- Similarity-based reduction
- All-flash single tier
- Multi-protocol access
- Wide erasure coding
- GPU-oriented throughput
- Snapshots and replication
Only in Zerto
- Continuous data protection
- Journal-based recovery
- Automated failover
- Non-disruptive testing
- Multi-cloud mobility
- Long-term retention
- VMware
- Hyper-V
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
VAST Data
- A GPU training cluster where storage throughput, not compute, is the bottleneck on job completionnot Zerto
- A genomics group holding petabytes of sequencing output that must stay immediately readable rather than archived to tapenot Zerto
- A quantitative finance team running backtests over historical market data that a disk tier cannot serve fast enoughnot Zerto
- An organisation consolidating a fast tier and an archive tier into one system to reduce rack space and power drawnot Zerto
Zerto
- Data protectionnot VAST Data
- Disaster recoverynot VAST Data
- Business continuitynot VAST Data
- Ransomware protectionnot VAST Data
- Compliancenot VAST Data
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
VAST Data
- Data reduction ratios drive the economics, and datasets that are already compressed, such as media or encrypted files, reduce poorly and destroy the cost per terabyte case.
- There is a minimum viable cluster size, so the entry cost is high and the platform is not sensible for a small footprint however attractive the architecture is.
- Pricing is quoted against effective capacity after reduction, which means the price you signed depends on an assumption about your own data that only becomes measurable after deployment.
- The platform has expanded into database and data catalogue functions, which broadens the roadmap but means buyers evaluating it as a file system must be careful not to be sold an adjacent product they will not use.
- As a relatively young vendor in a market of long-lived incumbents, buyers with ten year retention requirements should press on long term support commitments and hardware availability rather than assume them.
Zerto
- Zerto with Azure is listed on UK G-Cloud as a reseller-managed disaster recovery service, not Zerto's own licence pricing, with OS management from £75 per host per month for the public sector
Pricing, plan by plan
VAST Data
On request- VAST Data Platform$undefined/year
- Priced per usable capacity after data reduction
- Hardware and software sold together or via certified partners
- Subscription and capital purchase options
Zerto
$5/month- Zerto Enterprise Cloud$5/month
- Continuous protection
- Journal-based recovery
- Multi-cloud mobility
Which should you pick?
Choose VAST Data if
- You need disaggregated architecture.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want similarity-based reduction.
Choose Zerto if
- You need continuous data protection.
- You work on Windows, Linux, Web.
- You also want journal-based recovery.
Questions people ask
- Is VAST Data or Zerto better?
- Neither clearly leads. VAST Data starts at On request and Zerto at $5/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, VAST Data or Zerto?
- VAST Data starts at On request and Zerto at $5/month.
- Does VAST Data or Zerto run on more platforms?
- VAST Data runs on Linux. Zerto runs on Windows, Linux, Web.
- What is VAST Data best used for?
- VAST Data is most often used for a gpu training cluster where storage throughput, not compute, is the bottleneck on job completion, a genomics group holding petabytes of sequencing output that must stay immediately readable rather than archived to tape, a quantitative finance team running backtests over historical market data that a disk tier cannot serve fast enough, an organisation consolidating a fast tier and an archive tier into one system to reduce rack space and power draw. Of those, a gpu training cluster where storage throughput, not compute, is the bottleneck on job completion and a genomics group holding petabytes of sequencing output that must stay immediately readable rather than archived to tape are not what Zerto is typically brought in for.
- What can VAST Data do that Zerto cannot?
- VAST Data covers Disaggregated architecture, Similarity-based reduction, All-flash single tier, Multi-protocol access. Zerto covers Continuous data protection, Journal-based recovery, Automated failover, Non-disruptive testing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
VAST Data: Do we still need an archive tier?
That is the central claim, and it holds when your data reduces well. Run a reduction assessment on your actual dataset before accepting the economics.
Zerto: Can I try Zerto before buying?
Yes, Zerto offers a 14-day free trial or on-demand lab access to test the platform.
SourceVAST Data: How is capacity priced?
On usable capacity after data reduction, quoted rather than published. That makes the reduction ratio assumption the most important number in the contract.
VAST Data: Is it suitable for a small deployment?
No. There is a minimum cluster size and the entry cost reflects it. Small footprints are better served elsewhere.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- VAST Data vs Ceph
- VAST Data vs MinIO
- VAST Data vs Nasuni
- VAST Data vs pCloud
- VAST Data vs Scality RING
- VAST Data vs Storj
- VAST Data vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- VAST Data vs CrashPlan
- VAST Data vs TrueNAS
- VAST Data vs Microsoft OneDrive
- VAST Data vs Panzura
- VAST Data vs Tigris
- VAST Data vs Tresorit
- VAST Data vs Veritas NetBackup
- VAST Data vs Box
- VAST Data vs Cloudian
- VAST Data vs Google Drive
- VAST Data vs IDrive
- VAST Data vs Carbonite
- VAST Data vs Barracuda Backup
- VAST Data vs Backblaze
- VAST Data vs Cloudflare R2
- VAST Data vs LucidLink
- VAST Data vs IDrive e2
- Zerto vs Ceph
- Zerto vs MinIO
- Zerto vs Nasuni
- Zerto vs pCloud
- Zerto vs Scality RING
- Zerto vs Storj
- Zerto vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Zerto vs CrashPlan
- Zerto vs TrueNAS
- Zerto vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Zerto vs Panzura
- Zerto vs Tigris
- Zerto vs Tresorit
- Zerto vs Veritas NetBackup
- Zerto vs Box
- Zerto vs Cloudian
- Zerto vs Google Drive
- Zerto vs IDrive
- Zerto vs Carbonite
- Zerto vs Barracuda Backup
- Zerto vs Backblaze
- Zerto vs Cloudflare R2
- Zerto vs LucidLink
- Zerto vs IDrive e2

