File Storage · head to head
Ceph vs Zerto

Ceph
File Storage
Open source distributed storage providing object, block and file from one cluster
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Ceph has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Ceph ceph assumes an operator who understands placement groups, CRUSH rules and recovery tuning, so organisations without dedicated storage staff routinely end up with a cluster that works until the first failure and then does not.; Zerto zerto with Azure is listed on UK G-Cloud as a reseller-managed disaster recovery service, not Zerto's own licence pricing, with OS management from £75 per host per month for the public sector
- They diverge on capability: Ceph covers RADOS object store, Zerto covers Continuous data protection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Ceph and Zerto actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (File Storage).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Ceph
- RADOS object store
- RADOS Gateway
- RBD block devices
- CephFS
- CRUSH placement
- Erasure coded pools
Only in Zerto
- Continuous data protection
- Journal-based recovery
- Automated failover
- Non-disruptive testing
- Multi-cloud mobility
- Long-term retention
- VMware
- Hyper-V
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Ceph
- Backing a private cloud where virtual machine disks, shared filesystems and an S3 endpoint all need the same hardwarenot Zerto
- Growing past the point where a proprietary array upgrade costs more than a rack of commodity serversnot Zerto
- Research and media environments with petabytes of data and staff who can operate storagenot Zerto
- Providing an S3 endpoint on premises with multi site replication under your own controlnot Zerto
Zerto
- Data protectionnot Ceph
- Disaster recoverynot Ceph
- Business continuitynot Ceph
- Ransomware protectionnot Ceph
- Compliancenot Ceph
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Ceph
- Ceph assumes an operator who understands placement groups, CRUSH rules and recovery tuning, so organisations without dedicated storage staff routinely end up with a cluster that works until the first failure and then does not.
- Small clusters are inefficient: three way replication means a third of raw capacity is usable, and erasure coding needs enough failure domains to be safe, so the economics only work above a certain size.
- Recovery and rebalancing generate heavy internal traffic, so a failed disk can degrade client latency across the cluster unless backfill is throttled correctly beforehand.
- Upgrades must follow a strict daemon order across monitors, managers, OSDs and gateways, and a mistake in that order on a live cluster is difficult to reverse.
- Because it is self hosted, every byte served to the internet is transit you pay for on your own links, so the free licence does not mean free egress and bandwidth planning becomes your problem rather than the providers.
Zerto
- Zerto with Azure is listed on UK G-Cloud as a reseller-managed disaster recovery service, not Zerto's own licence pricing, with OS management from £75 per host per month for the public sector
Pricing, plan by plan
Ceph
Free- CephFree
- Full functionality, no capacity limit
- Object, block and file interfaces
- Community support via mailing list and Slack
Zerto
$5/month- Zerto Enterprise Cloud$5/month
- Continuous protection
- Journal-based recovery
- Multi-cloud mobility
Which should you pick?
Choose Ceph if
- You need rados object store.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want rados gateway.
Choose Zerto if
- You need continuous data protection.
- You work on Windows, Linux, Web.
- You also want journal-based recovery.
Questions people ask
- Is Ceph or Zerto better?
- Neither clearly leads. Ceph starts at Free and Zerto at $5/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Ceph or Zerto?
- Ceph has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Ceph and $5/month for Zerto.
- Does Ceph or Zerto run on more platforms?
- Ceph runs on Linux. Zerto runs on Windows, Linux, Web.
- Can I use Ceph for free?
- Yes. Ceph has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Zerto starts at $5/month.
- What is Ceph best used for?
- Ceph is most often used for backing a private cloud where virtual machine disks, shared filesystems and an s3 endpoint all need the same hardware, growing past the point where a proprietary array upgrade costs more than a rack of commodity servers, research and media environments with petabytes of data and staff who can operate storage, providing an s3 endpoint on premises with multi site replication under your own control. Of those, backing a private cloud where virtual machine disks, shared filesystems and an s3 endpoint all need the same hardware and growing past the point where a proprietary array upgrade costs more than a rack of commodity servers are not what Zerto is typically brought in for.
- What can Ceph do that Zerto cannot?
- Ceph covers RADOS object store, RADOS Gateway, RBD block devices, CephFS. Zerto covers Continuous data protection, Journal-based recovery, Automated failover, Non-disruptive testing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Ceph: How many nodes do I need to start?
Three is the practical minimum for a replicated cluster with real fault tolerance, and most production advice starts at five once you account for maintenance windows.
Zerto: Can I try Zerto before buying?
Yes, Zerto offers a 14-day free trial or on-demand lab access to test the platform.
SourceCeph: Is it faster than a SAN?
Not on single stream latency. It wins on aggregate throughput and on growing without a forklift upgrade, which is a different property from raw speed.
Ceph: Can I buy support?
Yes. IBM sells IBM Storage Ceph and SUSE and others have offered supported builds; the upstream project itself is free.
Ceph: Should I use it just for S3?
If object is all you need, a dedicated object store is simpler to run. Ceph earns its complexity when you need block and file as well.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Ceph vs MinIO
- Ceph vs Panzura
- Ceph vs Scality RING
- Ceph vs VAST Data
- Ceph vs Backblaze
- Ceph vs Duplicati
- Ceph vs Storj
- Ceph vs Tigris
- Ceph vs Cloudflare R2
- Ceph vs Cloudian
- Ceph vs IDrive e2
- Ceph vs TrueNAS
- Ceph vs LucidLink
- Ceph vs pCloud
- Ceph vs Sync.com
- Ceph vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Ceph vs Carbonite
- Ceph vs Barracuda Backup
- Ceph vs Veritas NetBackup
- Ceph vs Nasuni
- Ceph vs CrashPlan
- Ceph vs IDrive
- Ceph vs Tresorit
- Zerto vs MinIO
- Zerto vs Panzura
- Zerto vs Scality RING
- Zerto vs VAST Data
- Zerto vs Backblaze
- Zerto vs Duplicati
- Zerto vs Storj
- Zerto vs Tigris
- Zerto vs Cloudflare R2
- Zerto vs Cloudian
- Zerto vs IDrive e2
- Zerto vs TrueNAS
- Zerto vs LucidLink
- Zerto vs pCloud
- Zerto vs Sync.com
- Zerto vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Zerto vs Carbonite
- Zerto vs Barracuda Backup
- Zerto vs Veritas NetBackup
- Zerto vs Nasuni
- Zerto vs CrashPlan
- Zerto vs IDrive
- Zerto vs Tresorit

