Developer Tools · head to head
Namespace vs Ninox

Namespace
Developer Tools
The dev platform for the next 100 billion commits
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Namespace is a developer infrastructure platform.
- Free plans on both; paid from $100/mo and €25/mo.
- Where Namespace falls short: developer plan is pay-as-you-go only; minimum usage unclear.
- Where Ninox falls short: free plan limited to 5 users and 5,000 records.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Namespace and Ninox actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes).
Not yet recorded: pricing model for Namespace.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Namespace
- Devboxes
- GitHub Actions runners
- Docker builds
- Cross-invocation caching
- NVMe storage
- High-speed networking
- Multiple OS support
- Bazel and Turborepo support
Only in Ninox
Nothing recorded that Namespace does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Namespace
- Providing AI coding agents with cloud-based development environmentsnot Ninox
- Accelerating CI builds with faster GitHub Actions runnersnot Ninox
- Distributing builds across teams with managed infrastructurenot Ninox
- Scaling development velocity for monorepo organizationsnot Ninox
Ninox
- No-code database solutions for small to medium teamsnot Namespace
- Workflow automation and process managementnot Namespace
- Customer data and project tracking with custom viewsnot Namespace
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Namespace
- Developer plan is pay-as-you-go only; minimum usage unclear
- Team plan $100/mo is competitive but usage limits may be tight
- Devbox pricing separate at $0.004/minute could add up quickly
- Enterprise plan requires custom sales conversation
Ninox
- Free plan limited to 5 users and 5,000 records
- API call limits restrict automation on lower tiers (1,000/month free, 10,000/month team)
- Only 7-day history on free plan vs. unlimited on Business
Pricing, plan by plan
Namespace
Free- DeveloperFree
- Pay-as-you-go
- On-demand compute
- Docker builds
- Team$100/mo
- 100,000 unit minutes
- 1,000 Docker builds
- Everything in Developer
- Business$250/mo
- 250,000 unit minutes
- 2,500 Docker builds
- Everything in Team
- EnterpriseOn request
- Custom compute/Docker build limits
- Audit log export
- Enterprise SSO
Ninox
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 5 users
- 100 MB storage
- Up to 5,000 records
- Team€25/mo
- 5 GB storage per user
- 50,000 records per user
- 10,000 API calls per user per month
- Business€40/mo
- 10 GB storage per user
- 250,000 records per user
- 50,000 API calls per user per month
- EnterpriseOn request
- Custom pricing available
- Dedicated support
- Custom solutions and governance
Which should you pick?
Choose Namespace if
- You need devboxes.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, macOS, Windows, Linux.
- You also want github actions runners.
Questions people ask
- Is Namespace or Ninox better?
- Neither clearly leads. Namespace starts at Free and Ninox at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Namespace or Ninox?
- Namespace starts at Free and Ninox at Free.
- Does Namespace or Ninox run on more platforms?
- Namespace runs on Web, macOS, Windows, Linux. Ninox runs on Web.
- Can I use Namespace for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Namespace best used for?
- Namespace is most often used for providing ai coding agents with cloud-based development environments, accelerating ci builds with faster github actions runners, distributing builds across teams with managed infrastructure, scaling development velocity for monorepo organizations. Of those, providing ai coding agents with cloud-based development environments and accelerating ci builds with faster github actions runners are not what Ninox is typically brought in for.
- What can Namespace do that Ninox cannot?
- Namespace covers Devboxes, GitHub Actions runners, Docker builds, Cross-invocation caching.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Namespace: How is compute usage metered on the Developer plan?
Developer plan uses pay-as-you-go billing. Devboxes bill at $0.004 per minute. Storage and caching services have separate usage-based fees. A 30-day free trial is available to test usage patterns.
SourceNinox: How much does Ninox cost?
Ninox is free for individuals with up to 5 users. Team plan is 25 EUR per user per month (billed annually), and Business plan is 40 EUR per user per month (billed annually). Enterprise plans have custom pricing.
SourceNamespace: What is the difference between Team and Business plans?
Team ($100/mo) includes 100,000 unit minutes and 1,000 Docker builds with email support. Business ($250/mo) includes 250,000 unit minutes, 2,500 Docker builds, and high concurrency with a dedicated Slack channel.
SourceNinox: Is Ninox free?
Yes, Ninox offers a free plan for up to 5 users with 100 MB storage and 5,000 records. No payment required to start, and includes all core views: table, form, chart, kanban, maps, and calendar.
SourceNamespace: Can Namespace support AI coding agents?
Yes, Namespace Devboxes are specifically designed as feature-rich development environments for AI coding agents, with full tooling and performance optimization.
SourceNinox: What is Ninox Team plan pricing?
The Team plan costs 25 EUR per user per month (billed annually). It includes 5 GB storage per user, 50,000 records, 10,000 API calls per month per user, and 30-day history. Annual billing is required.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Namespace vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Namespace vs CodeSandbox
- Namespace vs WarpBuild
- Namespace vs Depot
- Namespace vs Blacksmith
- Namespace vs Earthly
- Namespace vs Kubernetes
- Namespace vs GitLab
- Namespace vs Jenkins
- Namespace vs LaunchDarkly
- Namespace vs Terraform
- Namespace vs Daytona
- Namespace vs HCP Terraform
- Namespace vs Helm
- Namespace vs Jitsu
- Namespace vs Notepad++
- Namespace vs Postman
- Namespace vs Prettier
- Namespace vs Airtable
- Namespace vs Apache Airflow
- Namespace vs Knack
- Namespace vs FaunaDB
- Namespace vs Readyset
- Namespace vs Cockroach Labs
- Namespace vs PostgreSQL
- Namespace vs RabbitMQ
- Namespace vs Amazon Aurora
- Namespace vs ClickHouse
- Namespace vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Namespace vs Memcached
- Namespace vs MotherDuck
- Namespace vs Neo4j
- Namespace vs OpenSearch
- Namespace vs Cassandra
- Namespace vs Firestore
- Namespace vs Apache Kafka
- Ninox vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Ninox vs CodeSandbox
- Ninox vs WarpBuild
- Ninox vs Depot
- Ninox vs Blacksmith
- Ninox vs Earthly
- Ninox vs Kubernetes
- Ninox vs GitLab
- Ninox vs Jenkins
- Ninox vs LaunchDarkly
- Ninox vs Terraform
- Ninox vs Daytona
- Ninox vs HCP Terraform
- Ninox vs Helm
- Ninox vs Jitsu
- Ninox vs Notepad++
- Ninox vs Postman
- Ninox vs Prettier
- Ninox vs Airtable
- Ninox vs Apache Airflow
- Ninox vs Knack
- Ninox vs FaunaDB
- Ninox vs Readyset
- Ninox vs Cockroach Labs
- Ninox vs PostgreSQL
- Ninox vs RabbitMQ
- Ninox vs Amazon Aurora
- Ninox vs ClickHouse
- Ninox vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Ninox vs Memcached
- Ninox vs MotherDuck
- Ninox vs Neo4j
- Ninox vs OpenSearch
- Ninox vs Cassandra
- Ninox vs Firestore
- Ninox vs Apache Kafka

