Government · head to head
MyRec.com vs NEOGOV

MyRec.com
Government
Recreation management for small parks departments, priced on your annual revenue with no contract
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

NEOGOV
Government
Public sector HR suite covering civil service recruiting, onboarding, training and policy management
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: MyRec.com the annual fee scales with department revenue, so a successful department pays more for the same software as its programme income grows.; NEOGOV each module is shallower than the specialist product it competes with, so agencies buying the full suite for coherence accept weaker performance management and learning than they would get separately.
- They diverge on capability: MyRec.com covers Revenue-based annual fee, NEOGOV covers Civil service recruiting.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which MyRec.com and NEOGOV actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Government).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in MyRec.com
- Revenue-based annual fee
- Programme registration
- Facility reservations
- Point of sale
- League scheduling
- Everything included
Only in NEOGOV
- Civil service recruiting
- Veterans preference handling
- GovernmentJobs.com posting
- Onboarding workflows
- Learning and training records
- Policy management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
MyRec.com
- A town recreation department of one or two staff moving off paper registration forms and a shared spreadsheetnot NEOGOV
- A department that wants to choose its own payment processor rather than accept the software vendor ratenot NEOGOV
- Replacing a system that charges per module, where every new programme type triggered an upsellnot NEOGOV
- A department needing field permits and league scheduling without buying a facilities management suitenot NEOGOV
NEOGOV
- A city or county HR department that must run scored examinations and ranked eligibility listsnot MyRec.com
- A public safety agency needing policy acknowledgement records that stand up in litigationnot MyRec.com
- An agency replacing a commercial applicant tracking system that cannot handle veterans preferencenot MyRec.com
- A school district or university consolidating recruiting, onboarding and mandated training recordsnot MyRec.com
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
MyRec.com
- The annual fee scales with department revenue, so a successful department pays more for the same software as its programme income grows.
- It is built for small and mid-sized departments and lacks the permitting, aquatics and multi-facility depth a large city requires.
- Credit card processing is explicitly excluded from the fee, so the total cost depends on a merchant agreement the department must source and negotiate itself.
- Integration surface is thin, with no meaningful connection to municipal ERP or finance systems, meaning revenue reconciliation is a manual export.
- The vendor is small, so there is limited third-party consulting capacity and a narrow bench for support during peak registration periods.
NEOGOV
- Each module is shallower than the specialist product it competes with, so agencies buying the full suite for coherence accept weaker performance management and learning than they would get separately.
- Policy management arrived through the PowerDMS acquisition rather than being built in, and the join between it and the rest of the suite still reads as two products.
- Implementation is long and configuration heavy because the civil service rules that make the product valuable have to be encoded for your jurisdiction, and that work is billed.
- Pricing is not published and scales with headcount, so a large agency can pay several times what a comparable one pays without knowing it unless someone reads the public contracts.
- Private equity ownership since the Warburg Pincus investment has coincided with an acquisition led strategy, and buyers should expect further products bolted on rather than deeper integration of the existing ones.
Pricing, plan by plan
MyRec.com
On request- MyRec.com$undefined/year
- Single annual fee calculated from department annual revenue
- Third parties report entry around 2,850 to 3,445 USD per year
- Site build, onboarding and training included
NEOGOV
On request- NEOGOV Suite$undefined/year
- Quoted per module and scaled by employee headcount
- Implementation and data migration priced separately from the subscription
- Available through cooperative purchasing and state term contracts
Which should you pick?
Choose MyRec.com if
- You need revenue-based annual fee.
- You also want programme registration.
Choose NEOGOV if
- You need civil service recruiting.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want veterans preference handling.
Questions people ask
- Is MyRec.com or NEOGOV better?
- Neither clearly leads. MyRec.com starts at On request and NEOGOV at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, MyRec.com or NEOGOV?
- MyRec.com starts at On request and NEOGOV at On request.
- Does MyRec.com or NEOGOV run on more platforms?
- MyRec.com runs on Web. NEOGOV runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is MyRec.com best used for?
- MyRec.com is most often used for a town recreation department of one or two staff moving off paper registration forms and a shared spreadsheet, a department that wants to choose its own payment processor rather than accept the software vendor rate, replacing a system that charges per module, where every new programme type triggered an upsell, a department needing field permits and league scheduling without buying a facilities management suite. Of those, a town recreation department of one or two staff moving off paper registration forms and a shared spreadsheet and a department that wants to choose its own payment processor rather than accept the software vendor rate are not what NEOGOV is typically brought in for.
- What can MyRec.com do that NEOGOV cannot?
- MyRec.com covers Revenue-based annual fee, Programme registration, Facility reservations, Point of sale. NEOGOV covers Civil service recruiting, Veterans preference handling, GovernmentJobs.com posting, Onboarding workflows.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
MyRec.com: How is MyRec priced?
A single annual fee calculated from your department annual revenue, using a calculator on the MyRec site. Third parties report entry around 2,850 to 3,445 USD a year.
NEOGOV: Why not use a commercial applicant tracking system?
Because civil service rules such as ranked eligibility lists, rule of three certification and veterans preference are not expressible in commercial products, so the statutory steps end up in spreadsheets.
MyRec.com: Is there a setup fee?
No. Site build, onboarding and training are included in the annual fee.
NEOGOV: Can I find out what other agencies pay?
Yes. These are public procurements, so executed contract values appear in council agenda packets and state term contract listings. Read several before negotiating.
MyRec.com: Are card fees included?
No. Credit card processing is separate and you arrange your own merchant account.
NEOGOV: What did NEOGOV acquire?
PowerDMS, a policy management and accreditation product, in 2021, which is now sold as the policy module of the suite.
MyRec.com: Is there a contract?
No long-term contract is required, which is unusual in municipal software.
NEOGOV: Is it only for the United States?
Effectively yes. The value is in encoding US civil service and public safety requirements.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- MyRec.com vs CivicPlus
- MyRec.com vs OpenGov
- MyRec.com vs RecDesk
- MyRec.com vs Euna Solutions
- MyRec.com vs Springbrook Software
- MyRec.com vs Periscope Holdings
- MyRec.com vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- MyRec.com vs CentralSquare Asset Management
- MyRec.com vs GovPilot
- MyRec.com vs eCode360
- MyRec.com vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- MyRec.com vs IAPro
- MyRec.com vs iCompass
- MyRec.com vs Mapbox Government
- MyRec.com vs Mark43
- MyRec.com vs MuckRock
- MyRec.com vs Municode
- MyRec.com vs Rock Solid
- MyRec.com vs Tyler Technologies
- MyRec.com vs Granicus
- MyRec.com vs Bonfire
- MyRec.com vs ArchiveSocial
- MyRec.com vs Clariti
- MyRec.com vs Zencity
- MyRec.com vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- MyRec.com vs mySidewalk
- MyRec.com vs VUEWorks
- MyRec.com vs GovQA
- NEOGOV vs CivicPlus
- NEOGOV vs OpenGov
- NEOGOV vs RecDesk
- NEOGOV vs Euna Solutions
- NEOGOV vs Springbrook Software
- NEOGOV vs Periscope Holdings
- NEOGOV vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- NEOGOV vs CentralSquare Asset Management
- NEOGOV vs GovPilot
- NEOGOV vs eCode360
- NEOGOV vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- NEOGOV vs IAPro
- NEOGOV vs iCompass
- NEOGOV vs Mapbox Government
- NEOGOV vs Mark43
- NEOGOV vs MuckRock
- NEOGOV vs Municode
- NEOGOV vs Rock Solid
- NEOGOV vs Tyler Technologies
- NEOGOV vs Granicus
- NEOGOV vs Bonfire
- NEOGOV vs ArchiveSocial
- NEOGOV vs Clariti
- NEOGOV vs Zencity
- NEOGOV vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- NEOGOV vs mySidewalk
- NEOGOV vs VUEWorks
- NEOGOV vs GovQA
