APIs · head to head
Akoya vs Sanity

Akoya
APIs
Bank-owned, token-based open finance network that replaces screen scraping for US financial data
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Sanity
APIs
Headless CMS with real-time collaborative editing and structured content APIs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Sanity has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Akoya coverage reaches several thousand institutions but does not match aggregators that can still scrape, so applications needing the long tail of small credit unions will run a second data provider alongside it.; Sanity free plan limited to 10,000 documents and 100GB assets
- They diverge on capability: Akoya covers FDX standard APIs, Sanity covers Content API.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Akoya and Sanity actually diverge.
Identical on both: platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Akoya
- FDX standard APIs
- Token-based access
- Investment data
- Accounts, balances and transactions
- Statements and tax forms
- Customer identity
- Consumer permission management
- Single integration
Only in Sanity
- Content API
- Collaborative editing
- Structured content
- Webhooks
- Third-party services
- GROQ query language
- Cloud support
- JavaScript SDK support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Akoya
- A wealth management platform that needs Fidelity brokerage holdings and tax lots, which cannot be scraped since Fidelity closed that route in October 2023not Sanity
- A tax preparation product retrieving tax forms and cost basis directly from the institution rather than asking users to upload PDFsnot Sanity
- A lender that needs a permissioning trail defensible under CFPB section 1033 rather than a credential-sharing arrangementnot Sanity
- A bank that wants to meet data sharing obligations through one network connection instead of building and policing its own developer interfacenot Sanity
Sanity
- Headless CMS for structured content managementnot Akoya
- Collaborative content editing with real-time multiplayer supportnot Akoya
- API-driven content delivery with GROQ query languagenot Akoya
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Akoya
- Coverage reaches several thousand institutions but does not match aggregators that can still scrape, so applications needing the long tail of small credit unions will run a second data provider alongside it.
- The network is owned by large banks, so roadmap and coverage priorities reflect owner interests rather than those of the fintechs consuming the data, and a recipient has no leverage over which institutions are added next.
- Data availability is decided institution by institution, meaning a bank may expose balances but not transactions or investments, and recipients must verify field-level coverage per institution rather than assume the FDX model is fully populated.
- Pricing is unpublished and usage based, which makes it difficult to compare against aggregator pricing during a build-versus-buy decision and forces a sales cycle before you can model cost.
- The token model requires the institution to have implemented its side, so newly onboarded institutions arrive on the institution timetable, not yours, and a launch dependent on a specific bank can slip badly.
Sanity
- Free plan limited to 10,000 documents and 100GB assets
- Free plan supports only public datasets
- Growth plan capped at 50 seats maximum
- Private datasets, scheduled drafts, and comments/tasks require paid plans
- Annual billing unavailable for Growth plan; Enterprise-only
Pricing, plan by plan
Akoya
On request- Akoya Data Access$undefined/year
- Usage-based pricing quoted by data product and call volume
- Separate commercial terms for data recipients and for financial institutions joining the network
- No published rate card
Sanity
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 20 seats
- 2 public datasets only
- 10,000 documents included
- Growth$15/month
- Up to 50 seats per seat
- 2 private or public datasets
- 25,000 documents included
- Enterprise$null/month
- Custom seats
- Custom datasets
- Custom document limits
Which should you pick?
Choose Sanity if
- You need content api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want collaborative editing.
Questions people ask
- Is Akoya or Sanity better?
- Neither clearly leads. Akoya starts at On request and Sanity at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Akoya or Sanity?
- Sanity has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Akoya and Free for Sanity.
- Does Akoya or Sanity run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Sanity for free?
- Yes. Sanity has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Akoya starts at On request.
- What is Akoya best used for?
- Akoya is most often used for a wealth management platform that needs fidelity brokerage holdings and tax lots, which cannot be scraped since fidelity closed that route in october 2023, a tax preparation product retrieving tax forms and cost basis directly from the institution rather than asking users to upload pdfs, a lender that needs a permissioning trail defensible under cfpb section 1033 rather than a credential-sharing arrangement, a bank that wants to meet data sharing obligations through one network connection instead of building and policing its own developer interface. Of those, a wealth management platform that needs fidelity brokerage holdings and tax lots, which cannot be scraped since fidelity closed that route in october 2023 and a tax preparation product retrieving tax forms and cost basis directly from the institution rather than asking users to upload pdfs are not what Sanity is typically brought in for.
- What can Akoya do that Sanity cannot?
- Akoya covers FDX standard APIs, Token-based access, Investment data, Accounts, balances and transactions. Sanity covers Content API, Collaborative editing, Structured content, Webhooks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Akoya: Who owns Akoya?
A group of large US banks. It was spun out of Fidelity, which is why Fidelity data access runs through it.
Sanity: What does the Sanity Free plan include?
The Free plan includes up to 20 seats, 2 public datasets, 10,000 documents, 1 million API CDN requests per month, and 2 permission roles.
SourceAkoya: Is Akoya screen scraping?
No. It uses FDX standard APIs with OpenID Connect tokens, so credentials are never shared with or stored by the data recipient.
Sanity: How much does Sanity Growth plan cost per user?
The Growth plan costs $15 per seat per month, with up to 50 seats, and includes 25,000 documents, 1 million API CDN requests, and 5 permission roles.
SourceAkoya: Can we use Akoya alone instead of an aggregator?
Usually not. Its investment and large-institution coverage is excellent, but the long tail of smaller institutions is thinner, so most teams run both.
Sanity: What is included in Sanity Enterprise pricing?
Enterprise pricing is custom and requires contacting sales. It includes custom seat limits, custom datasets, Single Sign-On, and dedicated support.
SourceAkoya: Does it help with CFPB section 1033?
It is designed around it, providing tokenised permissioned access and consumer revocation rather than credential sharing.
Sanity: Does Sanity offer annual billing discounts?
Annual and invoice payment options are available exclusively for Enterprise customers. Self-serve plans (Free and Growth) use monthly billing only.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Akoya vs Yodlee
- Akoya vs MX Technologies
- Akoya vs Ozone API
- Akoya vs Aiia
- Akoya vs Tink
- Akoya vs Salt Edge
- Akoya vs Trustly
- Akoya vs Lithic
- Akoya vs Token.io
- Akoya vs Bud Financial
- Akoya vs Tribe Payments
- Akoya vs Method Financial
- Akoya vs Asyncapi
- Akoya vs AWS API Gateway
- Akoya vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Akoya vs Basis Theory
- Akoya vs Boomi API Management
- Akoya vs Codat
- Akoya vs Payload CMS
- Akoya vs KeystoneJS
- Akoya vs Strapi
- Akoya vs GraphQL Apollo
- Akoya vs Prisma
- Akoya vs Sensedia
- Akoya vs Hasura
- Akoya vs PocketBase
- Akoya vs Directus
- Akoya vs Paw
- Akoya vs Tyk
- Akoya vs Janus Gateway
- Akoya vs Kong Gateway
- Akoya vs Marqeta
- Akoya vs Meniga
- Akoya vs Moov
- Akoya vs PubNub
- Sanity vs Yodlee
- Sanity vs MX Technologies
- Sanity vs Ozone API
- Sanity vs Aiia
- Sanity vs Tink
- Sanity vs Salt Edge
- Sanity vs Trustly
- Sanity vs Lithic
- Sanity vs Token.io
- Sanity vs Bud Financial
- Sanity vs Tribe Payments
- Sanity vs Method Financial
- Sanity vs Asyncapi
- Sanity vs AWS API Gateway
- Sanity vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Sanity vs Basis Theory
- Sanity vs Boomi API Management
- Sanity vs Codat
- Sanity vs Payload CMS
- Sanity vs KeystoneJS
- Sanity vs Strapi
- Sanity vs GraphQL Apollo
- Sanity vs Prisma
- Sanity vs Sensedia
- Sanity vs Hasura
- Sanity vs PocketBase
- Sanity vs Directus
- Sanity vs Paw
- Sanity vs Tyk
- Sanity vs Janus Gateway
- Sanity vs Kong Gateway
- Sanity vs Marqeta
- Sanity vs Meniga
- Sanity vs Moov
- Sanity vs PubNub
